Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key that could have saved the Titanic
UK Telegraph ^ | 8/29/07 | Graham Tibbetts

Posted on 08/29/2007 5:18:09 PM PDT by wagglebee

It looks for all the world like an ordinary key but this unremarkable piece of metal could have saved the Titanic from disaster.

It is thought to have fitted the locker that contained the crow's nest binoculars, vital in detecting threats to the liner lurking in the sea in the pre-sonar days of 1912.

Catastrophically for the Titanic and the 1,522 lives lost with her, the key's owner, Second Officer David Blair, was removed from the crew at the last minute and in his haste forgot to hand it to his replacement.

Without access to the glasses, the lookouts in the crow's nest were forced to rely on their eyes and only saw the iceberg when it was too late to take action.

One, Fred Fleet, who survived the disaster, later told the official inquiry into the tragedy that if they had had binoculars they would have seen the obstacle sooner.

When asked by a US senator chairing the inquiry how much sooner, Mr Fleet replied: "Enough to get out of the way."

The key and its importance has only properly come to light 95 years later after it was put up for auction.

Alan Aldridge, of auctioneers Henry Aldridge and Sons in Devizes, Wilts, said: "We think this key is one of the most important artefacts from the Titanic to have come to light.

"A few days before the Titanic sailed, Mr Blair was bumped off the ship, a decision which probably saved his life.

"But in Blair's rush to leave the Titanic he carried this key off with him in his pocket and forgot to hand it to his replacement, Charles Lightoller.

"Obviously he only realised this after the Titanic had left Southampton and kept the key as a memento. But had Lightoller had the key then there probably would have been a pair of binoculars in the crow's nest.

"It is the key that had the potential to save the Titanic."

Mr Blair, 37, from Broughty Ferry, Forfarshire, sailed on the Titanic from Belfast to Southampton on April 3, 1912.

He had been due to be the second officer for the Titanic's voyage to New York on April 10. But the White Star Line, the ship's owners, removed Mr Blair and drafted in Henry Wilde, a senior officer from sister ship, the Olympic, because of his experience of such large liners.

He wrote of his disappointment in a postcard he sent to his sister-in-law days before the Titanic left Southampton. In the card, which is also up for auction, he wrote: "Am afraid I shall have to step out to make room for chief officer of the Olympic.

This is a magnificent ship, I feel very disappointed I am not to make her first voyage." The 46,000-ton Titanic struck the iceberg in the north Atlantic at 11.45pm on April 14 and sank at 2.20am on April 15. Mr Wilde was among those who perished.

According to the US inquiry into the sinking, Mr Fleet recalled seeing Mr Blair with binoculars during the trip from Belfast to Southampton. Asked where Mr Blair's glasses went, Mr Fleet replied: "We do not know. We only know we never got a pair." Senator Smith, the chairman of the inquiry, said: "Suppose you had glasses… could you have seen this black object [at] a greater distance?"

Fleet: "We could have seen it a bit sooner."

Smith: "How much sooner?"

Fleet: "Well, enough to get out of the way."

Smith: "Were you disappointed that you had no glasses?"

Fleet: "Yes, sir."

Mr Blair, who was later awarded the King's Gallantry medal for jumping into the Atlantic to rescue a crewman, eventually passed the key on to his daughter Nancy. She gave it to the British and International Seamans Society in the 1980s.

Intriguingly, the key may not entirely unlock the Titanic mystery. According to an alternative account, it may have unlocked the crow's nest telephone.

It is expected to fetch up to £70,000 on September 22.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; titanic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
As horrific as the Titanic sinking was, the reality is that lessons were learned that could only have been learned because of a disaster of this magnitude.
1 posted on 08/29/2007 5:18:10 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Semi-GGG Ping.


2 posted on 08/29/2007 5:18:31 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Maybe, but the real reason they sank was the design and more importantly Hydrogen embrittlement.
3 posted on 08/29/2007 5:21:54 PM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee

That’s part of what I meant. Titanic’s sinking resulted in some very valuable design and safety lessons.


4 posted on 08/29/2007 5:22:58 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Sorry, I scanned the article and not your response.

Yes, more than often these disasters are what improves designs avoiding future disasters.

Tacoma Narrows Bridge being one of the most obvious.

5 posted on 08/29/2007 5:28:23 PM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
With apologies, this is utter rubbish.

If a valuable piece of equipment is inaccessible while at sea the Captain or anyone of rank can order any necessary steps to recover it for use up to and including cutting torches.

The locks of that era were easily breached and no doubt at least one member of the crew could have done it on command.

The whole line of reasoning sounds like something from a Monty Python sketch.

"Oh dear, we've locked the binoculars away, what shall we do?"

Best regards,

6 posted on 08/29/2007 5:32:06 PM PDT by Copernicus (Mary Carpenter Speaks About Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

pimp my key bump


7 posted on 08/29/2007 5:33:19 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

I don’t disagree at all.


8 posted on 08/29/2007 5:34:26 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

Well said!


9 posted on 08/29/2007 5:37:27 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
lessons were learned that could only have been learned because of a disaster of this magnitude.

Including the lesson that the screws were too close together, probably too shallow and the rudder wasn't big enough.

10 posted on 08/29/2007 5:44:29 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; windcliff
I found more information here from the Daily Mall.
11 posted on 08/29/2007 6:03:32 PM PDT by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee
Galloping Gertie (aka Tacoma Narrows Bridge)

12 posted on 08/29/2007 6:09:19 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (PUT AN END TO ORGANIZED CRIME. ABOLISH THE I.R.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I can not feature a ships captain that did not have a complete set of spare keys!
13 posted on 08/29/2007 6:16:12 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus; wagglebee; EggsAckley
The locks of that era were easily breached and no doubt at least one member of the crew could have done it on command.

Well, the only part of the 'key' argument that may hold merit has less to do specifically with the key, and more to do with Blair. If he had turned over the key, he presumably would have told someone what it unlocked, and what was inside.

Based on the quotes, it appears the crew didn't know where binoculars were, or even if there were any binoculars - perhaps they should have thought to break into the locker and check, but until they hit the iceberg, it probably never seemed urgent enough.
14 posted on 08/29/2007 6:27:49 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
Except that the idea that a ship would encounter a situation such that there would not be enough room to get out of an iceberg's way was not in the mind of Captain Smith, so he probably felt the binoculars weren't that important. If the key was on board, they might have used the binoculars without even thinking of their importance.

Part of what doomed the Titanic was its sheer size, which was much bigger than any ship before the Olympic class. They didn't have experience operating such a behemoth. This was shown in an earlier collision when the ship, or perhaps it's sister, caused another ship in port to swing out toward it by the force of its movement in the water. Though as I recall Smith had captained an earlier ship that hit an iceberg he just didn't appreciate the danger. Indeed that earlier accident may have given him a false sense of security that he would come out of any iceberg encounter okay. Though some unaccounted for ships were probably lost this way over the years, without radio or even wireless no one was around to witness it. No one stopped to think how long it was going to take to swerve around an obstacle, or that the rudder was too small to work efficiently, or that throwing the engines in reverse would delay the effects of the rudder and cause a turbulence that worked against it. They would have been better to stop engines and ram right into it, bow first.

On the other hand, the conditions that night added to the circumstances that doomed Titanic. It was believed to be a black berg, and on a calm and moonless night it was very difficult to see. Not even the telltale white caps striking the berg at the waterline were there.

I am trying to remember the speculation about this factor is one of the books I read. I think it came down on the side of the advantages of binoculars, mostly as a barrier from the icy wet air that would have stung the lookouts' eyes more than any magnification. In any event, it's incredible there was only a single key, or really that they even locked them up at all.

15 posted on 08/29/2007 6:29:55 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

I am thinking I remember that the crew thought the binoculars had been left in port. Maybe that was a story invented to shield this guy Blair. Anyway, there was some cannibalizing of Titanic for its sister Olympic after the collision caused repairs to be needed and parts were taken off Titanic at the yards and used for Olympic. Anyway, the bottom line is the crew didn’t realize how important they would turn out to be.


16 posted on 08/29/2007 6:35:28 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
My first thoughts also. An order to break the lock wouldn't have had to come from the Captain or the XO but from any Officer of the Watch.

Hubris sealed Titanic's fate.
17 posted on 08/29/2007 6:45:14 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Thanks Waggs.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

18 posted on 08/29/2007 7:18:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, August 29, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
removed Mr Blair and drafted in Henry Wilde, a senior officer from sister ship, the Olympic, because of his experience of such large liners.
Not quite enough, apparently.
19 posted on 08/29/2007 7:19:38 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, August 29, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I seem to remember reading about the crews nest crew having binoculars during the trip. I don’t beleive this sstory, also why come out now? why not before?


20 posted on 08/30/2007 5:00:27 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson