Bush did it!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
To: Aussie Dasher
I think it was Captain Kangaroo. Just look at him, so crazy and assassin like.
 
2 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:06:49 AM PDT by 
Jaysun
(I got a new lawnmower and she got a new dishwasher. Neither of them speak English.)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
Yes, the Senate will open hearings on where Gonsalez, Bush and Cheney were that day. Oh, and Iraq was based on a lie, blah blah blah. 
Life is starting to resemble a Thomas Pynchon novel.
3 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:07:59 AM PDT by 
Darkwolf377
(Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
For those of us FReepers alive when it happened ... I never really believed it then, and my PARENTS never bought the story for sure.
 The most telling evidence to me has always been the simplest. Take the rifle Oswald used, and try to reproduce the shots in the time frame, on target, employing the skills of a trained sharpshooter. I remember (at least I think I do) black and white film of a guy trying to fire a shot, cycle the bolt action, aim and fire again (lather rinse repeat) and he could not do it in the same time frame/ accuracy as Oswald who was not a trained shooter.
 tin foil ...
4 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:08:14 AM PDT by 
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
arlen spector
rino
traitor to his country
warren commission chief architect of the magic bullet theory
it is time for a new gop
6 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:09:25 AM PDT by 
Enduring Freedom
(my axis of evil includes democrats and liberal media)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
I DID IT!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! my birthday, 3/10/1969
 
 Yeah ok, I wasn't born yet. Its my metanarrative so facts be damned!!! I DID ITS, I TELLS YA!!!! Dan Rather will have the exclusive.
9 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:15:32 AM PDT by 
kb2614
(Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
23 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:30:46 AM PDT by 
nikos1121
(Thank you again Jimmy Carter.)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
The findings "mean that the bullet fragments from the assassination that match could have come from three or more separate bullets."Or they could NOT have come from three or more separate bullets. Note carefully that these researchers are NOT claiming that their analysis demonstrates that the bullet fragments did in fact come from three or more separate bullets. 
If that is the case, "then a second assassin is likely, as an additional bullet would not be attributable to the main suspect, Mr Oswald," the report said.
Note the "if that is the case" language - they are saying that IF something is true which their study does NOT in fact actually claim to demonstrate is true (i.e., that the fragments must have come from three or more separate bullets), then two shooters are likely. The "if that is the case" language makes this statement meaningless, because the researchers have not demonstrated that "it is the case." 
"We believe there is no scientific basis from the fragment matching performed by Dr Guinn to conclude that only two bullets were the sources of the assassination fragments."
Although it is possible that only two bullets were the source; they are saying merely that this one particular test made did not in and of itself prove that to be the case. 
Heavy spin in this article.
 
To: Aussie Dasher
Isn’t the 50 year sealed evidence and testimony gag order ready to expire in 6 years?
28 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:33:18 AM PDT by 
moonman
 
To: Aussie Dasher
The first on-site reports said the shooting sounded like machine gun fire.
Check it out — I remember it vividly.
31 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:34:44 AM PDT by 
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
 
To: Shooter 2.5; The KG9 Kid
To: Aussie Dasher
Maybe it was two groups of people who were unaware of each other. Some communist nut working from the book depository and and a group of organized crime members working from the train yards. That’s why it might not make any sense.
43 posted on 
05/18/2007 3:47:42 AM PDT by 
InvisibleChurch
(Forty on the highway, forty in the driveway.)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
A NEW analysis of remaining bullet fragments from the 1963 assassination of US president John F Kennedy suggests a second shooter may have been involved.Well --- Duhhh!!! They found grass stains on one of the bullet fragments ---
 
57 posted on 
05/18/2007 4:26:17 AM PDT by 
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
I had some friends who were wild conspiracy theorists (or, should I say,"believers?") who showed me an "enhanced" video of the Zapruder tape, wherein the driver of Kennedy's Limo turned around with a chrome-plated pistol and delivered the fatal shot.
I read a book by the son of Sam (Giancana, that is) who said, "Daddy did it."
Contrary to what other poster have said, I HAVE seen demonstrations showing that the three shots could have been delivered by one person in the time frame, and Lee Harvey Oswald was trained by the USMC in marksmanship.
Having said all that, I still am reluctant to believe the "Acted alone" conclusion. But the key word here is "believe." All of the conspiracy "proofs" I have seen are too suspect.
To: Aussie Dasher
For later read.
 Saw a show where an Aussie marksman went to great lengths to recreate the shot that hit Kennedy and the Governor. He proved pretty conclusively that it could have happened as described.
 The marksman posts occasionally on a hunting board I go to, and talked about the show. He seems pretty legit.
66 posted on 
05/18/2007 6:33:50 AM PDT by 
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
It took these guys 40 years to figure out what 90% of America already knew about a second gunman? Oy.
To: Aussie Dasher
I was sitting in 7th grade history class when the principal put this over the school intercom that Kennedy had been shot. We sat there and listened to it the remainder of the day. Did not even change classes any longer. Then, that was all that was on TV until they dropped Kennedy in his grave. Wall to wall coverage. Lord help us if that had happened to JFK today. 400 cable shows an hour. Wait till Slick Willie Klinton hits the dust. They will maul the TV screens of the greatest of all time for two weeks.
73 posted on 
05/18/2007 7:03:27 AM PDT by 
RetiredArmy
(America has lost its mind and is on its last days as a free country & Republic.)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
A NEW analysis of remaining bullet fragments from the 1963 assassination of US president John F Kennedy suggests a second shooter may have been involved. This news story is wrong. Even if every conclusion of this new study is correct, it does not suggest another shooter. 
 Previous NAA studies of the bullet fragments have said that all fragments came from only two bullets. This study says that it is *possible* that the fragments *could have* come from more than two. It doesn't suggest that there were in fact more than two, just that it can't be ruled out based on NAA.
 
90 posted on 
05/20/2007 6:55:55 PM PDT by 
mlo
 
To: Aussie Dasher
Bush did it!!!!
Whether you know it or not, there are some who link GHWB to JFK’s assassination. Not to be outdone, W took time off from campaigning to kill JFK,Jr. It’s on the internet so it must be true.
95 posted on 
05/20/2007 7:32:03 PM PDT by 
Sapper26
('Would you feel better if they was pushed outta windas?' Archie Bunker on gun control)
 
To: Aussie Dasher
On multiple occasions trained snipers have recreated exactly what happened that day, and showed a sole gunman could have done everything.
96 posted on 
05/20/2007 7:39:24 PM PDT by 
LukeL
(Never let the enemy pick the battle site. (Gen. George S. Patton))
 
To: Aussie Dasher
Bump to the 5/25/07 thread covering the same story.
98 posted on 
05/25/2007 10:15:01 AM PDT by 
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson