Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/13/2007 6:39:17 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1910919/posts?page=1



Skip to comments.

Anna Nicole Smith, The Investigation #3

Posted on 04/07/2007 3:14:35 PM PDT by mom4kittys

Thread Number 3


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: aboutthebaby; anna; annanicole; ans; deadwrongdaddy; getalife; giveitup; hksisafillintheblank; howietheleach; ilovelarry; killingmesoftly; larryisawesome; larryisthedaddy; larrysalunatic; lazyboylarry; lovechild; movealong; nojusticenopeace; oneheroinevirgie; overbonbonsdeadbody; prayersfordannielynn; ritaisaliar; ritaisnotaliar; shameonlarry; spermdonorsanonymous; sternsaresquatters; teambirkhead; thefatladywarmingup; thefirm; turkeybasterd; virgieisevil; virgieisnotevil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 11,661-11,680, 11,681-11,700, 11,701-11,720 ... 17,421-17,435 next last
Comment #11,681 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11,682 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11,683 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11,684 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11,685 Removed by Moderator

To: Lizarde
Sperm donor is just about right in the end.....considering that she slept with just about anyone....

Let's face it...Anna was a cheap hustler and a whiner since she went her own way in her youth. And without the big bazoombas, well, she was just plain big.

If Anna was poor and unknown, would Larry have raised his hand??

Did the money go into the attorney's account so Howard couldn't lay claim to it just in case Larry wasn't the father?? I'll bet that's what the deal really was.

11,686 posted on 06/02/2007 6:18:45 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11683 | View Replies]

To: All
Looks like Larry has gone the way of Anna and Howard. "Sue Me" and "I'll sue you".

I imagine Howard is telling Larry that he'll win hands down. Of course, Howard hasn't won anything yet via the courts.

11,687 posted on 06/02/2007 6:22:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11686 | View Replies]

Comment #11,688 Removed by Moderator

To: Lizarde
LB was a “sperm donor”. You know, that makes me think of that psychic I read that said that LB WAS the father but it was artificial insemination. Who knows!? At any rate, I am beginning to believe that LB is more gay than not.
11,689 posted on 06/02/2007 7:19:51 AM PDT by gopheraj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11683 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde
I'd say it is likely that Larry was on drugs at some point and Howard has something on Larry that just might ruin his boy next door image.

Remember those emails that the bi**** female attorney brought up and the sign off that Larry said he made on some "confidential agreement"....under duress.

In this case, I'd say "duress" means "blackmail" and the whole affair had little to do with the emails. Larry signed off and agreed to go away because Howard has something on him. Howard is the typical "evil man" in every movie....the liar, the blackmailer, the sneak, the agitator, the confidant (Never mind the "M" word)....

He's the perfect candidate for the program "Numbers" and I just might write them.

11,690 posted on 06/02/2007 7:28:34 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11688 | View Replies]

Comment #11,691 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11,692 Removed by Moderator

To: nature

His whining isn’t the same as wanting your child. HE signed a contract. That will be honored. Mr money bags can’t argue show me the money on one hand and then whine I only wanted my daughter and meanie OD kept my money on the other. Read the agreement, it is spelled out. He might get a bit shaved down but no free lunch this time.
***

Have YOU read the contract? So you KNOW the contract said she got to keep $600,000 of HIS money and bill him for her laundry and dinners. Yeah, poor Opri.


11,693 posted on 06/02/2007 9:33:46 AM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11675 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The Houston probate trial in Marshall v Marshall ended in March 2001, with Anna losing. Then in late May 2001, the big $475 million “award” in the CA bankruptcy was overturned.

She was not having a good year.


11,694 posted on 06/02/2007 9:36:18 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11679 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

He agreed to allow her to negotiate deals for him that would raise funds to pay her fees - thus her representation of him would not cost him as much as it would otherwise.

She doesn’t have that money - it’s in the client trust account. She has to justify getting her cut of it and he has to justify shaving her bill down, in order to pay her.


11,695 posted on 06/02/2007 9:49:49 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11693 | View Replies]

Comment #11,696 Removed by Moderator

To: Rte66
Client's Trust Account or Attorney's Trust Account? I get checks cut to me all the time from the Attorney's Trust Account. It is authorized by the original deal which was negotiated between the attorney and his client which says he will do this and that person will be paid from the profits in the trust account.

It looks like Larry is REALLY saying that the third party (media) shouldn't have deposited it with Opri. I think Larry was PERHAPS trying to hide assets by authorizing the involvement of the third party.

11,697 posted on 06/02/2007 10:21:16 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11695 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

It doesn’t *belong* to either party - it’s a “Client Trust Account.” Both have signing privileges on it - but lots of paperwork has to be filed to take anything out of it and the client’s part of it is just to put money in it.

It’s mostly for services that will require a lot of outlay on the client’s behalf and the person performing the services doesn’t want to get stuck out on a limb without payment from the client.

The services person, because they’re in the business of performing that service on a regular basis, gets discounts and benefits that the client couldn’t get on his or her own, so it’s best for the client to have the service person perform the work and get the most value for the dollars spent.

In my case, not a law practice, I had to put out huge amounts of money for buying media time, printing, and hiring out other services - amounts I couldn’t front without client contracts or a trust account to back them.


11,698 posted on 06/02/2007 11:04:20 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11697 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

as for the husband’s dry cleaning - we don’t know yet whether LB spilled a drink on the husband or not!

****

I can’t believe everyone here is so willing to villify Larry and justify Debri Opri, even to the point of coming up with off the wall reasons why her husband’s laundry bill is on her legal bill! It’s reaching the level of “Because Anna would have wanted it that way” reaching that HKS pulls.


11,699 posted on 06/02/2007 3:17:42 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11696 | View Replies]

To: SundayGardener

You mean there’s still going to be an inquest? I had given up on it since I thought it was scheduled for late May. Now what’s the timeline?


11,700 posted on 06/02/2007 3:48:43 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11671 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 11,661-11,680, 11,681-11,700, 11,701-11,720 ... 17,421-17,435 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson