| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/09/2007 9:01:03 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Thread is getting too long for FR servers Please continue here at |
Posted on 02/08/2007 12:39:03 PM PST by kcvl
What's this crap about him making a "deal" with Larry? If Larry is the real dad, he should tell Howard to go to hell.
She left school real early. I doubt she has any writing skills but we ALL have patterns. It would show up in her writings.
But HKS claim the marraige is valid including a Baptist pastor.
So wouldn't that if it is true they are married make him the next of kin?
Without mentioning names/old wounds there was that case in Florida that the husband was chosen over Mom/Dad as next of kin.
Anna Nicole Smith's Diary Stolen, Baby's Real Father Revealed?
By Jennifer Cox Feb 23, 2007
Carver 'sharing' time with HK$ attorney. HK$ 'agreeing' w/GAL's decision. Hmmmm...cozy arrangement.
There it is...His name is Carver. He's saying that Seidlin was within his authority to protect Dannielynn's interests.
Coming to the podium is June Hoffman, Stern's Appelate Attorney.
Hoffman isn't very 'dynamic' is she?
Exactly.
I like that this judge is questioning Hoffman's arguments. Not just taking statements at face value.
He and Howard seem to be up to something....dealing with money, no doubt. Larry probably figures he has a better chance of getting Dannilynn by making a deal with the devil since the courts always side with the devil.
This farce going on right now proves it. HKS shouldn't even have a say about this.
There is no legal document to support a marriage. Howard is grasping at straws.
Who notified Vergie?? And when??
I've watched CourtTV often and am surprised how many attorneys could put me to sleep. They stumble on their words, they lose their place in their notes. etc., almost to the point of looking like they don't know what they're doing. And they usually do this in closing arguments. I'm always surprised by that. Like you say, not dynamic.
A Citizen Reporter came up with that one. And for every "good one" i come up with you'll find 50 "not so good ones". But i post the not so good ones because at some point they might turn into a good one. Does that make any sense?
Virgie Arthur, left, mother of Anna Nicole Smith and her attorney John O'Quinn arrive at the 4th District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach, Fla., Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007. A three-judge panel will hear oral argument on the petition filed by Arthur to let her bury her daughter in Texas.(AP Photo/Alan Diaz)
Exactly! You explained it, perfectly.
This Judge doesn't want to set a "precedent"..good thinking.
sw
I always find the prosecutors more interesting (and usually they're better looking). They've got the goods, whereas the defense attnys have nothing but bull and nasty demeanors.
Remember David what's name who defended Michael Peterson. That guy just oozed slime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.