Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik

Please recomment a fast linux that can run on older (p2/p3 256m ram) hardware. I'd love to move my webserver over to a linux box. But ever time I've tried linux it was just to damn slow to be useable.


39 posted on 10/13/2006 8:19:36 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
Please recomment a fast linux that can run on older (p2/p3 256m ram) hardware.

Any Linux can, what's probably slowing it down is the desktop (Gnome, KDE, etc.), which can be too slow for an older system. If we're talking webservers, running a quick Slackware/Gentoo install WITHOUT X or any graphical system and running the system from the terminal would probably be the best option.

If you want/need a desktop, try a lighter-weight one like IceWM.

45 posted on 10/13/2006 8:31:00 AM PDT by SeƱor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb; All
"Please recomment a fast linux that can run on older (p2/p3 256m ram) hardware. I'd love to move my webserver over to a linux box. But ever time I've tried linux it was just to damn slow to be useable."

Not sure what you are doing but I have clients that are running webservers on 486's with 64 megs of ram and the speed is just fine. One problem I have noticed over the years that may also apply to you, is the video card.

Some cards will make Linux run very slow if you are using Xwindows. Try replacing the video card with one of those cheap 32 meg pci cards. You can always return the card if it doesn't work.

Also for you MIS people out there you might want to look into Linux/VMware. Using this combo you can install most OS's on a Linux server base, including server OS's, and use them remotely from a cheap desktop or the internet(vncserver+fairly good connection)

The other upside to this is that if an OS fails, if you are doing the proper linux file backups, it can be reinstalled and up and running in 30 minutes or less.

47 posted on 10/13/2006 8:35:18 AM PDT by Post-Neolithic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb

On my slower PII, with less than 200mb of ram, I use XUbuntu.

You should be able to use standard Ubuntu on a PIII with 256mb of ram just fine.

Ive also used Puppy Linux which is bare bones and very fast on old machines.


54 posted on 10/13/2006 9:09:21 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Fitzmas Has Been Canceled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb
Please recomment a fast linux that can run on older (p2/p3 256m ram) hardware. I'd love to move my webserver over to a linux box. But ever time I've tried linux it was just to damn slow to be useable.

Oh, that's easy. I wrote a tutorial on the subject years ago.

Linux on an eMachines 600is.

76 posted on 10/13/2006 9:51:26 AM PDT by Prime Choice (True Conservatives don't vote for Liberals just because they have an 'R' by their name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb

How much traffic does the web server get and are you running any thing else on it (like a database)..


146 posted on 10/14/2006 12:42:16 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("I can kill you with my brain" - River Tam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb
But ever time I've tried linux it was just to damn slow to be useable.

Because Unix/Linux was designed to run on high powered scientific equipment. Windows was designed to run on the original "desktop computers", or low low horsepower.

152 posted on 10/14/2006 1:28:43 PM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American. While you still can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson