Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologiesHolocaust was fallout of evolution theory
World Net Daily ^ | Posted: August 19, 2006 | World Net Daily

Posted on 08/19/2006 6:39:43 AM PDT by RaceBannon

Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies Holocaust was fallout of evolution theory, says new production

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: August 19, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Charles Darwin should share with Hitler the blame for the 11 million or more lives lost in the Holocaust, a new television special explains. And, the program says, the more than 45 million American lives lost to abortion also can be blamed on that famous founder of evolutionary theory.

The results of Darwin’s theories

"This show basically is about the social effects of Darwinism, and shows this idea, which is scientifically bankrupt, has probably been responsible for more bloodshed than anything else in the history of humanity," Jerry Newcomb, one of two co-producers, told WorldNetDaily.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anothercrevothread; bravosierra; christianmythology; crevolist; darwin; ecclesspinniningrave; enoughalready; eugenics; evolution; fakeatheistgay; fascistfrannie; foolishness; genesisidolater; islamicnazis; keywordwars; liesaboutdarwin; mntlslfabusethread; mythology; pavlovian; superstition; warongenesis; wingnutdaily; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-709 next last
To: Popman

your failure to make the obvious connection between patterns of thought and men's actions is what amazes me how Kevin Bacon fails to fall in your camp.

The ideas of a perfect man, though a superior breed, and the controling of that breeding through Eugenics, ALL BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY THOUGHT, was brought to fruition through Hitler.

Next time, instead of showing your ignorance of the topic presented, read the links provided,and than respond point by point. You only made yourself look like a fool by commenting on a headline.


41 posted on 08/19/2006 7:33:37 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

all 3 links?

I doubt it.


42 posted on 08/19/2006 7:34:00 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
all 3 links? I doubt it.

Doubt whatever you like.

43 posted on 08/19/2006 7:35:32 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Charles Darwin? Check.
Adolph Hitler? Check.
Holocaust? Check.

World Net Daily? Yes!


44 posted on 08/19/2006 7:38:34 AM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
>My gawd, this is so stupid, it makes my head hurt.


45 posted on 08/19/2006 7:39:08 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

The evidence that the Third Reich was highly influenced by Darwinism and evolution is overwhelming.

The Lady Macbeth routines on this thread are over done.


46 posted on 08/19/2006 7:44:14 AM PDT by lonestar67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Charles Darwin should share with Hitler the blame for the 11 million or more lives lost in the Holocaust,

How can Darwin possibly share the blame for 11 million deaths done by someone who lived 100 years later.

That's like blaming the first Catholic Pope for the Inquisition that happened hundreds of years later or maybe white people today should pay for reparations from what white people did 150 years ago?

Same logic applies

I agree that the evolutionary principles drove Hitler evil mind to slaughter millions of people, but Hitler is responsible for his own actions.

So I take it your next post will be in support of reparations?

47 posted on 08/19/2006 7:46:24 AM PDT by Popman ("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

So what?

I have plenty of proof Jim Jones was a Chrisitian.

Guilt by association is a poor, poor substitute for data, argumentation and logic.


48 posted on 08/19/2006 7:47:38 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984
However, a mere belief in superiority of certain groups or races is far different than what Hitler did in advocating murder of allegedly "inferior" types.

And to be precise, the Nazi concept of racial superiority was not based in intelligence. Nazis believed that the superior races are those who have instinct for collective cooperation and civilization building. It was enough if the leaders were very smart.

They believed that pure blooded Indo-Europeans created civilizations which declined as they mixed with inferior races (like ancient Greeks or Romans).

They believed that the races of second rank were those who were capable of mere maintaining of already received civilization. There were fit to be subjects to the master race.

The third rank were those who were not fit for civilized life and who should have been left alone in their tribal way of life.

Then there were smart but parasitic races which should have been isolated or eliminated.

National Socialism was seeing the mankind as species to be bred like farm animals.

49 posted on 08/19/2006 7:58:25 AM PDT by A. Pole (Evolution has demonstrated that the optimal IQ is the average IQ !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
That is the reductio ad hitleram, a fallacy, to give it a formal name.
50 posted on 08/19/2006 8:03:11 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

"Stalin's Communism is based on evolution.
"

Not on Darwinian evolution, it wasn't. Do some research. You are incorrect.


51 posted on 08/19/2006 8:04:52 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Oh geez, not this sh!t again.


52 posted on 08/19/2006 8:07:04 AM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

"National Socialism was seeing the mankind as species to be bred like farm animals."

Kinda got it wrong, didn't the Nazis? They're gone, we survive. I guess they didn't study hard enough.


53 posted on 08/19/2006 8:07:47 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

They believed that pure blooded Indo-Europeans created civilizations which declined as they mixed with inferior races (like ancient Greeks or Romans).

Explanation please. Are you saying the Indo-Europeans declined like ancient Rome?


54 posted on 08/19/2006 8:09:42 AM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Obviously the mass killing of Jews in Europe during the Middle Ages (e.g. the 1st Crusade, etc.) The expulsion from England, Spain & elsewhere was inspired by evolution.
(Also don't forget the fact that Jews were annoying, inconvenient "dhimma" in Muslim countries.(They did on occasion have their uses!) I am sure this was all due to evolution also ! But wait the persecutors were reading secret hidden documents about evolution, "The DarWini Code". Also it had to exist in Roman times why else would the Romans depopulate the area of Judea call it Palestine, rename Jerusalem, and forbid Jews on pain of death to live there. Clearly all that time Charles Darwin spent on the Beagle was in his cabin translating the ancient family texts into English so he could undermine the Christian world and thus do the work of the devil.
It's all so clear !
55 posted on 08/19/2006 8:11:32 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
"This is not the first time this subject was brought up on FR!!"

The first time should have been the last time.

56 posted on 08/19/2006 8:24:27 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Amen.


57 posted on 08/19/2006 8:28:32 AM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Do you have an intelligen refutaion of the 3 links provided or are you just making an attack on the poster?


58 posted on 08/19/2006 8:29:08 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Explanation please. Are you saying the Indo-Europeans declined like ancient Rome?

Romans ie Latins were Indo-European same way as Greeks were. But after they created their civilizations they absorbed people of other races. The decline was supposed to take long time measured in centuries or in generations, especially if the ruling group preserved racial purity.

Nazis were seeing Germanic race (Germans, English, Scandinavian) as superior because they preserved their Indo-European bloodline relatively intact. BTW, Hitler believed that English were superior to Germans and that Germans were doing well because they had superior leaders :)

Nazis have seen the successes of US as expression of the racial quality of the ruling WASPs. They have seen the expansion of Russia as a result of Germanic origin of Russian aristocracy and bureaucrats (imported by the post-Petrine Tsars).

Interestingly the later view led to the major miscalcalculation - Hitler was convinced that Soviet Russia after the Slavic peasant and Jewish takeover was not capable of resisting German army.

59 posted on 08/19/2006 8:29:40 AM PDT by A. Pole (Evolution has demonstrated that the optimal IQ is the average IQ !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Sorry, but Karl Marx plainly stated evolution was one of the basis for his theories.


60 posted on 08/19/2006 8:30:02 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-709 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson