Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Candy Ass Military
14 august 2006 | rider237

Posted on 08/09/2006 11:07:42 AM PDT by rider237

this weeks "navy times" came out. it had the usual articles in it. one very touching one about the last carrier operations of the f-14s. then.....


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: 00howtowinfriends; 0andinfluencepeople; 1struleofholes; 1stthread; academy; addiction; alcohol; alcoholics; boozers; candyass; change; dreck; drunkards; drunkensailor; flatpeter; horrifiedfascination; illiteracy; military; nannystate; nannyteetotalers; navy; needscaps; needsmorecowbell; newgrammar; newsactivism; nicotineaddicts; smokers; soft; threadvirgin; tobacco; trainwrecks; vanity; whine; writeliketrog; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-360 next last
To: BykrBayb

I served in the Army and Gulf War I ya nitwit, and when I joined basic training they didn't allowed smoking. Read the whole damn thread.

DoD already has done a the study that smoking reduces readiness. Go write them and tort the merits of smoking makes better soldiers, maybe some white suits will show up at your door cause your nuts.


301 posted on 08/16/2006 9:50:32 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

Kerry was in the military too, and he has your same attitude toward the troops. Try showing some respect, instead of insisting they should morph into clones of your anti-military buddies at that rag you're promoting.


302 posted on 08/16/2006 9:56:02 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Bullcrap, promoting smoking or excusing it as a necessary evil means you don't give a crap about their long term health or their readiness. Supporting troops doesn't mean condoning deadly habits.

Liberal wankers are more likely to want to see soldiers poisoning themselves and reducing their combat effectiveness, so go look in the mirror.

DoD says you can stuff it and they make the rules.

303 posted on 08/16/2006 10:03:30 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Go have one and choke on it with your hero.
304 posted on 08/16/2006 10:09:12 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

I'll put my heroes (the troops) up against your heroes (kerry and your liberal website http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0801-28.htm ) any day of the week, pretty boy.


305 posted on 08/16/2006 10:16:36 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

America Struggles With Its Own Evangelical Taliban - http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0801-28.htm .

Breaking News and Views for The Progressive Community - http://www.commondreams.org .

Great heroes you have there.


306 posted on 08/16/2006 10:25:02 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

You see Bush smoke? Hell no! Get a clue, fool.

Commonsense is commonsense irregardless of the source and it evades an idiot like you that thinks inhaling 100 known carcinogens is good for soldiers and only sick sadistic freak would condone treating PTSD with smoking.

You don't know a damn thing about the US armed forces or what it means to build the best team on earth. Your the kind a baffoon that would want to see olympic athletes smoking before competition.

Don't like the Telegraph then go find another source and you lack the brains to dispute the facts. DoD still says shove it and they ain't liberal wankers that want to poison the troops.


307 posted on 08/16/2006 10:42:07 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

Lt. Ehren Watada: Protecting First Amendment Freedoms by Opposing Illegal War - http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0815-32.htm

And here I thought it was the soldier who protected our freedom.


308 posted on 08/16/2006 10:46:07 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

The left's attempt to pussify the troops is not going to make them stronger, no matter how you try to spin it. You can link to all the liberal rags on the Internet, but a man is still a man.


309 posted on 08/16/2006 10:54:06 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Are you going to debate the topic or read more crap from commondreams than I have ever read in my life.

I take it your visaully impaired too cause that story came the Telegraph UK.

Published on Thursday, February 2, 2006 by the Independent / UK
'Marlboro Man' Turns Against War He Symbolised

Your logic is, you don't have a leg to stand on, so you will make up non-topic crap that has nothing to do with anything. You don't really give a crap Blake Miller either.


310 posted on 08/16/2006 11:01:10 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Your doing a good job at trying to pussify them, since pussies and weak minded fools smoke. Liberal wanker potheads and dopers love to smoke too.

I'd love to see the demographics on leftist smokers, cause they all need chemical crutches to cope with.

Traitors and idiots also think they know more than the DoD.


311 posted on 08/16/2006 11:06:23 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

US military announces ban on smoking [b]1994[/b]
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/308/6931/738

You don't know jack about the US armed forces, pinko


312 posted on 08/16/2006 11:12:10 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

I was quoting from the link YOU provided. I'd never heard of those anti-American sleezeballs, until you used them to back up your anti-military position.


313 posted on 08/16/2006 11:15:04 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

I suppose you and I both know about as much as the other about the military. I know the truth, and you know everything Soros tells you about them.

Here's another one from your site.

A Self-Defeating War
by George Soros
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0815-35.htm


314 posted on 08/16/2006 11:18:27 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

You still trying to figure out how poisoning the troops makes a winning team and typing up the letter to the Department of the Army and the DoD saying coughing and gagging is good for GI Joe?

Or is it your a weak minded smoking fool and want to project your filth and stupidity on others.

Clinton still smokes too, go over to DU where you belong.


315 posted on 08/16/2006 11:20:58 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

You seem to be confused. DU is the place for your liberal views. There is a clear attempt to turn FR into another DU, by spreading their anti-American propaganda here. If you honestly believed anything you've said, and weren't actually a liberal, you wouldn't have relied on George Soros and his cronies to back you up.


316 posted on 08/16/2006 11:34:14 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
This is from the VA. So you don't get an excuse to keep sneaking in your subversive pinko horsecrap and evading the topic.
It may be the case that something associated with PTSD is actually the cause of greater health problems. For example, it could be that a factor associated with PTSD, such as smoking, is the actual cause of the increased health problems. This is not likely, however, given that we know that PTSD is associated with poor physical health even when behavioral factors such as smoking are controlled.

PTSD and poor health also may be mediated in part by behavioral risk factors for disease such as smoking, substance abuse, diet, and lack of exercise.

http://www.ncptsd.va.gov/facts/specific/fs_physical_health.html

317 posted on 08/16/2006 11:35:40 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

Since you been posting and linking the most lefist crap on this thread, now we can put hypocrisy to your list of faults.

Still trying to evade ehh, yeah I knew your were a nitwit from the start.


318 posted on 08/16/2006 11:39:27 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

My "subversive pinko horsecrap?" That was from your site. And yes, it is subversive pinko horsecrap. But it's your subversive pinko horsecrap, not mine.

I'm not evading the topic. Read the original post that this topic is about. It's about the very behavior you've displayed on this thread. It's about attempts to pussify the troops. Post #289 sums it up pretty well. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1680601/posts?page=312#289 . Read it. It's all about you, and your demeaning attitude toward the troops. They are not children for you to control. And your liberal rag is wrong in claiming that people like you protect our freedom with your blathering. It is the troops who protect our freedom.


319 posted on 08/16/2006 11:44:34 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker

Yes, I've been posting links to your lefist crap website that you were promoting, so others can see more clearly where you're coming from. When I posted it, it was as an example of what I'm opposed to. You posted it as an example of what you support. Therein lies the difference.


320 posted on 08/16/2006 11:47:10 AM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-360 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson