Skip to comments.
US: hands off our citizens (Zotted with rusty tin can)
Posted on 03/08/2006 4:11:26 AM PST by Proud Brit
Edited on 03/08/2006 4:42:11 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
To: Anglo
the invasion force of 90,000 men would have been decimated.Leaving 81,000 German soldiers. You'd have been in deep kimchee.
101
posted on
03/08/2006 6:20:11 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Those who talk don't know, those who know don't talk.)
To: Proud Brit
102
posted on
03/08/2006 6:20:15 AM PST
by
usmcobra
(I always sing Karaoke the way it is meant to be sung, drunk, badly, and in Japanese)
To: Proud Brit
There is no excuse for that kind of ####ing language, you ####ing twit!!!!!!!!!
Just kidding. Your point is well taken. While we cannot trust most countries to be fair if we allow extradition of our citizens, we should trust the Brits, our allies for most of our history.
103
posted on
03/08/2006 6:20:19 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Diversity is a means to end.ing our existence.)
To: tjwmason
While I'm no expert, I don't think that there are any British "citizens." They're "subjects."It's true you're not an expert, in fact you're totally wrong. The British Nationality Act clearly states that we're citizens, as does my passport.
I stand corrected... You've been a citizen of Great Britain since 1981. I've been a citizen of the USA since 1962. Welcome to the club.
Mark
104
posted on
03/08/2006 6:22:50 AM PST
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: Proud Brit
THis poster does have a valid point, albeit unimaginativelly vulgar. THe U.S. should not be requesting extradition from another country to the U.S. on one standard, but demand a higher standard for countries requesting extradition from the U.S. And the U.S. has no business requesting extradition of suspects who have not committed crimes in the U.S. or against U.S. interests outside the U.S.
105
posted on
03/08/2006 6:22:51 AM PST
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: albyjimc2
Well said, Sir, and God bless you.
To: ASA Vet; Anglo
the invasion force of 90,000 men would have been decimated.
[Leaving 81,000 German soldiers. You'd have been in deep kimchee.]
All of this "we didn't need America" nonsense is an attempt in Europe these days to get out from under our dominance. There's no limit to the fantasy scenarios they will swallow to achieve that goal, as Anglo demonstrates by citing a "study" in the "'70s", wow, now that's historic.
I've had this discussion before, and am reluctant to start it again. Europeans are pathetically pretending Russia won the war, which is kind of like saying Europe lost WWII twice, once to Germany and once to Soviet Russia.
Without the US fighting in Asia, Japan could have easily attacked Russia from the East, defeating Russia in three weeks. Without the US bombing Germany, fully operational German industry plus reinforcements of occupying armies from Western Europe would have defeated Russia.
On D-day there were something like 29 Nazi divisions, 33 American divisions, and around 3 European divisions, 2 British and one made up of Euro-scraps from other countries. Without US, 3 European divisions against 29 Nazi divisions, any fool can see it was no contest.
Of course Britain would have only lost, and could have only lost, and Germany would have easily defeated Russia with no pressure from America. But then, the self-esteem needs in Europe today are intense, and that's putting it mildly.
107
posted on
03/08/2006 6:49:33 AM PST
by
starbase
(Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
To: Proud Brit
108
posted on
03/08/2006 6:49:56 AM PST
by
scott0347
(Commander of the 0347th Lancer Brigade, Operator of the Immaculate Steamroller)
To: doc30
I think this should go to Mark Levin. I know the worlds courts have some crazy ideas as to who is a criminal. Some of our state and local governments do also. I think Mark would know more about said treaty.
To: doc30
If I had time to do a little research I bet there is a lot more to this story than what was posted.
My gut feeling says this diatribe is a bunch of hogwash.
110
posted on
03/08/2006 7:27:32 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
111
posted on
03/08/2006 7:39:54 AM PST
by
Anglo
To: mollynme
I noticed he has been zotted, however I often post articles and I don't reply to any replies. Does that mean I am zot material?
112
posted on
03/08/2006 7:52:45 AM PST
by
Kaslin
(Wanted: New tagline.)
To: Anglo
What Mr. Johnson proposes is reasonable. That is what the original poster should of posted in the first place.
113
posted on
03/08/2006 8:25:33 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: starbase
i'm given to understand that its 20 US Divisions, 14 British divisions, 3 Canadian divisions and one each from France and Poland.
114
posted on
03/08/2006 8:27:11 AM PST
by
Anglo
To: Kaslin
No - but it would depend on the article. A "for your information" type of article often doesn't need replies unless you're interested in discussing it. An "in your face" posting that generates questions/complaints would hopfully get responses from you.
115
posted on
03/08/2006 8:27:24 AM PST
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: Proud Brit
Go #### yourself proud brit

116
posted on
03/08/2006 9:59:15 AM PST
by
vigilante2
(Thank you for your service Veterans)
To: Americanwolf; AQGeiger; Beaker; BenLurkin; baltodog; BJClinton; big'ol_freeper; Borax Queen; ...
Ursula stands on the still-smoking carcass of the enemy
117
posted on
03/08/2006 10:10:04 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(My vigor to fight has been renewed.)
To: Proud Brit
118
posted on
03/08/2006 10:22:43 AM PST
by
Dallas59
((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
To: Proud Brit
To: Proud Brit
your courts can prosecute American citizens in-absentia for your legal definition of slander and libel, and impose binding financial penalties. For this reason, Muslim groups use your courts to shut Americans up about islamic "charity" and other groups having connections to terror groups.
so don't expect any sympathy, dude.
120
posted on
03/08/2006 11:29:35 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson