Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush will talk on Iraq -- when he should talk about eminent domain (that's more threat to freedom)
churchillbuff

Posted on 06/27/2005 1:58:30 PM PDT by churchillbuff

Do I feel safer because we've spent $300,000 ousting a tinpot dictator from a country that didn't threaten American freedom? No --- but I feel a h-ll of a lot less safe in my home because the Supreme Court says it's ok for government to seize it and give it to some politically connected friends of politicians.

Has Bush said ANYTHING about the Supreme Court's outrageous eminent domain decision last week? I want to hear about THAT, not another speech about the mess in Iraq.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bushequalsclinton; bushisaliberal; bushisarino; chamberlainbuff; dulovesu; getlostneville; goawayneville; hero2du; lookatme; neville; nevillebuff; offmymedstoday; onmysleeve; pointlessvanity; remember911; takeahikeneville; thinkimcool; troll; uselessvanity; wardchurchill; whalepoop; yaaaaaaaaawn; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: MEGoody

Well, if the Democrats had not "borked" Judge Bork, that decision would have gone the other way now, wouldn't it?

If you want a justice system that is not so "loosey goosey", then you need to work to stop the Democrats' filibustering of every single "non-liberal" judge.


BTW, your comment about wasting money on Iraq, a "...country that didn't threaten American freedom..." is silly.

For an education, you should try peddling that nonsense to the families of the 9/11 victims. Are their murdered loved ones still "free"?

Conversely, are the intended American victims, whose murders by Jihadists were PREVENTED by our liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq, still "free"?

Shame on you for presenting such a lame attempt at "Bush-bashing"...


41 posted on 06/27/2005 2:17:21 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145


Gig'em!


42 posted on 06/27/2005 2:17:47 PM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent green is people!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
we've spent $300,000

They spend that much on red printer's ink alone.

43 posted on 06/27/2005 2:18:18 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kharaku
if Iraq or iran hit Israel with a Nuclear weapon"""

Iraq didn't have a nuclear weapon. And we had him covered with surveillance flights and sanctions. And if, in spite of all that, he was a threat to Israel, it would be perfectly fine with me if Israel wanted to take him out, like they did his nuclear reactor years ago. But since he didn't have WMDs and didn't have a military worth a bucket of spit, he wasn't a threat to US security, so I want our money spent defending our own freedom --- and let's start at home by defending private property.

44 posted on 06/27/2005 2:18:35 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

He did get a one week ban last year. I think it was due more to his disappearing from the middle of threads he started. Such as this one. Not a word from him since post #9.


45 posted on 06/27/2005 2:18:40 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 ( Heaven on Earth is where the nearest Starbucks is 60 miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Maybe your right about the spoofing but all republicans need to get hit hard when they don't follow through on conservative agenda.
46 posted on 06/27/2005 2:19:01 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
we've spent $300,000 They spend that much on red printer's ink alone."""

Correct. I meant 300 billion.

47 posted on 06/27/2005 2:19:17 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Entebbe

Facts appear to mean nothing to you, therefor its not worth one's time trying to explain anything to you.Read the quotes from above of all of your liberal politicians who vividly stated Saddam's clear and present Danger. GOD BLESS President Bush and his Leaders in this War on Terror for their Courage and Leadership.


48 posted on 06/27/2005 2:19:23 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mulch
You're right. Another conservative issue where Bush is AWOL.

yea, the President agrees with the liberal judges in this issue. PLEASE! How long has he he been talking about judges legislating from the bench?

49 posted on 06/27/2005 2:19:46 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kharaku

'Fallout' of My Chair LOL.

Your scenario, if it created a nuke winter, however might relieve all the complaints of the global warming bunch.


50 posted on 06/27/2005 2:20:32 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

No. He should talk about only Iraq on Tuesday. Since when does he control the Supreme Court? He can't do much to reverse the ruling. Maybe Congress put up an Amendment protecting our private property.

And, you should feel safer that we got rid of Saddam Hussein. I can't believe you could say that and call yourself a Churchill buff.


51 posted on 06/27/2005 2:20:34 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Saddam said he would hit Israel. Rain of Fire. It was just a matter of time, and that would have started something even bigger than if he just hit the US. That, I think, is the real game.


52 posted on 06/27/2005 2:20:56 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pfony1

Uh, to whom are you posting this? Did you mean to post this to the person who wrote the vanity?


53 posted on 06/27/2005 2:21:32 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

heh, good timing. you posted that 5 seconds after his first post since #9.

i agree with you though. just found that funny.


54 posted on 06/27/2005 2:21:39 PM PDT by Zeppelin (If we lose the war on terror... http://www.ebaumsworld.com/waronterrorism.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Please go back to DU, they love you there."""

When did DU'ers become supporters of private property and the Fifth Amendment? I want small goverment and I want our freedom to own and use private property protected. The Supreme Court last week did more to undermine our freedom than Saddam -- with no military and no WMDs -- ever did or ever could do. Yet Bush has said NOTHING about the outrageous eminent domain decision!

55 posted on 06/27/2005 2:21:46 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: RightWhale
Saddam said he would hit Israel."""

With what? He had no WMDs and we were flying over his country daily with spy planes, and had sanctions on him. Israel was always free to take him out on their own, the way they took out his nuclear reactor. But the US should use its resources on real threats to American security and freedom. Right now, the Supreme Court is the biggest threat to my freedom, because they've said I have no property rights.

57 posted on 06/27/2005 2:24:04 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: Zeppelin

The time it took me to refresh and then post was the difference. Sometimes, I hate Mondays.


59 posted on 06/27/2005 2:24:35 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 ( Heaven on Earth is where the nearest Starbucks is 60 miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
He had no WMDs

I think the Kurds would disagree with you..

60 posted on 06/27/2005 2:24:57 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson