Posted on 09/16/2025 9:42:58 AM PDT by TigerClaws
Why isn’t this question being asked?
Document at link. Text:
From the documents (and no verification they are real yet):
“The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact ‘Tyler’ stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point, leaving the rifle in a bush, messages related to visually watching the area where a rifle was left, a message referring to having left the rifle wrapped in a towel. The messages also refer to engraving bullets, and a mention of a scope and the rifle being unique. Messages from the contact Tyler also mention that he had changed outfits.”
A freeper who has owned that rifle says that two screws separate the pieces.
Watch the video in slow motion and you can see that it looks like something long is being carried, he really wants that bag, or wrapped object.
https://youtu.be/fdDtlNf7neI?si=AK8g5j9Mf_bPwr8h&t=16
This thread was very helpful, I learned some details so that it all makes sense now.
And I am guessing he left the rifle in the bush so that he could walk back home.
Except that he should have known about his DNA on the gun. Assuming that, he may have expected to either have someone pick it up later or he would retrieve the gun himself later. He should have buried the gun. Also, it looks like he didn’t have any coconspirators on that day or he would have had some help getting out of the shooting area.
Initially I thought that the video showed he did not have a rifle so I questioned the narrative. But taking the time to look more closely at the video multiple times, it does look like he is carrying something that has a cloth/flapping component to it that appears to be on the end of something long, as this flapping component appears farther from his body than simply a jacket in hand. Admittedly, the video isn’t the greatest for explicitly showing the item as a rifle, so there’s room for either point of view.
The guy in the video makes a pretty good argument that the shot didn't line up with the shooter. It's just an argument, not necessarily true.
“I have yet to hear what caliber bullet struck Charlie Kirk.”
Did they retrieve the bullet?
I have yet to hear what caliber bullet struck Charlie Kirk.
—
.30-06
“He brought the rifle with him. He left it in the bush on the way out.”
Does anyone know how the rifle got off of the roof? Video showing the assassin running on the roof and jumping off of the roof did not appear to show any rifle.
He took the long gun with him off the roof. He left the screwdriver.
Because of the distance from the camera, you can’t see the rifle when you play the video at normal speed. The black fabric around the rifle disappears against his black clothing. You have to run it at the slowest speed, or frame by frame to see it. But it’s there.
“””””taking the time to look more closely at the video multiple times, it does look like he is carrying something that has a cloth/flapping component to it that appears to be on the end of something long, as this flapping component appears farther from his body than simply a jacket in hand. Admittedly, the video isn’t the greatest for explicitly showing the item as a rifle, so there’s room for either point of view.”””””
That is exactly my take, I can’t quite make it out but it could very well be a rifle, the video is low grade but it should make one lean towards the rifle, although not totally convinced.
“A freeper who has owned that rifle says that two screws separate the pieces.”
Well the FIB claims to have pulled the shooter’s DNA off a screwdriver.
That’s what I heard yet the video of him dropping off the roof doesn’t appear to show it in his possession. If it had a folding stock perhaps it would go unseen otherwise I wouldn’t want to chance it gouging me while dropping with it hidden in my pants.
In one image I saw it looked like possibly a long, thin bag was in possession of the shooter as he fell off the roof (fairly long fall, too).
But his disassembling the rifle that quickly in that high-stress situation seems unlikely.
Will the rifle in the bush convict two perverts in the land?
This was also “making the rounds” yesterday but, unlike the Crowder document, no source is linked.
Posted FWIW.
Because how were these two kids - seemingly living apart from family in an apartment with no jobs but being “gamers” and furries pay for the apartment?
Who was coming and going with “out of state license plates” at the apartment?
Here’s the post:
Post
Conversation
A Gene Robinson
@AlBuffalo2nite
🔥BREAKING: The allegations are staggering…
Federal investigators are uncovering shocking details in the Charlie Kirk assassination case.
According to reports:
$50,000 in wire transfers flowed through DSA-linked accounts in the months leading to the killing.
Funds allegedly covered Tyler Robinson’s logistics, travel, and even weapon acquisition.
Internal FBI documents reportedly name Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and NY Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani as figures tied to the DSA’s leadership during this period.
Additional $20,000 deposits were uncovered, linked to Robinson’s live-in partner, with investigators pointing to ideological motives rooted in hatred of conservatives and Christians.
Bullets recovered at the scene reportedly carried carvings of Antifa and LGBTQ slogans.
If true, this isn’t random violence..
it’s organized, funded, and politically motivated.
The question is no longer who pulled the trigger… but who paid for it.
6:09 PM · Sep 15, 2025
·
1.4M
Views
https://x.com/AlBuffalo2nite/status/1967727578187436057
They just had the reading of the charges and it came out that the weapon had been given to him by his father and originally belonged to his grandfather. But the scope cost $2k. Perhaps someone else paid for that.
High rent, no known income, yet buying $2k in optics?
The person presenting this stated that it is not about there being 2 shooters. It seems to be that be the trajectory was not coming from in front of Charlie Kirk but rather from the right side of Charlie Kirk, or from the left if looking at Charlie, and that the bullet where we see blood is the exit wound, not the entry point of the bullet.
"Also, it looks like he didn’t have any coconspirators on that day..."
After watching the DA's press conference, I've come to the same conclusion. Robinson dreamed this up on his own. Compelled to do so by the constant barrage of left-wing narratives surrounding Charlie Kirk, DJT and MAGA in general he'd been absorbing for at least a year or more from whatever sources he was wallowing around in on line.
He's ruined the lives of Charlie's family, his own family and the rest of his miserable existence here on earth...over lies. I'll pray for his soul's salvation. But I don't give a damn for what he's facing with what's left for him here. He's in for a depraved and humiliating life behind bars, and he's earned it.
Who helped Matthew Thomas Crooks? What’s the truth about his cell phones and connections? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.