Skip to comments.
Joe Biden’s Dept of Justice – Merrick Garland was AG In Name Only for a Specific Reason
The Conservative Treehouse - The Last Refuge ^
| May 17, 2025
| Sundance
Posted on 05/18/2025 10:06:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Just another back door by Biden…..I’ll give you position so you can protect
me from my multiple crimes.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
As a standalone Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown-Jackson would have been a radical pick. Judge Brown-Jackson was a known activist in the DC District Court
Not to ignore the main point of this article, but this point is important: the Democrats scheme and work to place radicals and activists on the courts, including the highest court in the land. We listen to pablum from the Federalist Society and fight to get weak reeds like Amy Coney Barrett on the high court, where they promptly betray us.
We never learn. If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right. No more Barretts, no more Kavanaughs, no more Roberts.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
For weeks after 2018 election day in California, the new process of mail-in ballots changed the entire election day outcome. California was the BETA test for the national 2020 mail-in ballot fraud system. It all links back to the California ballot and illegal alien voter registration operation carried out by Eric Holder. California is a one-party state, NOT because the voters are stupid (well, some are) but because elections are rigged through many such fraudulent means
4
posted on
05/18/2025 10:21:22 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: AnotherUnixGeek
If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right. It would have to be either Steve Bannon or Stephen Miller.
Otherwise, he'll be more likely to be Michael Pence. He would rather be a part of the Swamp.
Now that you're saying it, I think Alito and Thomas are less likely to retire now. So far, Trump is 0-3.
Both Bushes were 1-2. In baseball, they have a .500 batting average.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Garland was selected as AG as a stick in the eye to Republicans who derailed his SCOTUS nomination. Garland did all the partisan dirty work the Dems asked him to do. He proved to be the Dem party hack that we thought he would be.
To: E. Pluribus Unum; lightman
I don’t understand this convoluted article.
But I know that Merrick Garland (who was a Harvard commencement speaker a few years ago) is Harvard’s disgrace, and Ketanji Brown-Jackson is America’s disgrace!
7
posted on
05/18/2025 10:30:30 AM PDT
by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sounds like what happened under Lyndon Johnson. Ramsey Clark, a left wing nut, and a nut generally irrespective of his political leanings, was named AG to force his father, Tom Clark, who was AG under Truman, to resign from the Supreme Court to pave the way for Thurgood Marshall.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t think obama is smart enough to be masterminding anything this complex.
To: Honorary Serb
A constellation of dots for the (possible) connecting.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
11
posted on
05/18/2025 10:47:35 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(Think about it: The Supreme Court is nine lawyers appointed for life by politicians. —David Horowitz)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Mark Levin would be my choice.
12
posted on
05/18/2025 10:52:05 AM PDT
by
batazoid
(Natural born citizen)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
13
posted on
05/18/2025 10:53:47 AM PDT
by
chiller
(Davey Crockett: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead". (We'll go ahead))
To: MinorityRepublican
I think President Trump is positioning Judge Jeanine Pirro for the Supreme Court.
14
posted on
05/18/2025 10:57:48 AM PDT
by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Biden was not the mastermind of this scheme. Who was?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
16
posted on
05/18/2025 10:59:53 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
To: AndyJackson
I know less after reading this article then I knew before.
It reads like an AI just randomly threw names into paragraphs.
17
posted on
05/18/2025 11:03:19 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(It was not us. It was them--all along.)
To: MinorityRepublican
Well, the fact that neither is a lawyer kills the idea dead. You don’t have to be, but I can’t imagine that the Senate would bite on that offering. Bannon: to old at 71. A drunk and a loose cannon. Miller. I love the guy. But too polarizing and none of the squishes would vote to confirm.
Cruz or DeSantis
18
posted on
05/18/2025 11:07:30 AM PDT
by
j.havenfarm
(24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: lee martell
Summary:
Building and keeping a republic is difficult.
Demolishing a republic is easy.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Joe Biden’s Dept of Justice – Merrick Garland was AG In Name Only for a Specific Reason”
Just like Joe Biden was President in name only.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson