Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Biden’s Dept of Justice – Merrick Garland was AG In Name Only for a Specific Reason
The Conservative Treehouse - The Last Refuge ^ | May 17, 2025 | Sundance

Posted on 05/18/2025 10:06:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2025 10:06:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just another back door by Biden…..I’ll give you position so you can protect
me from my multiple crimes.


2 posted on 05/18/2025 10:10:45 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
As a standalone Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown-Jackson would have been a radical pick. Judge Brown-Jackson was a known activist in the DC District Court

Not to ignore the main point of this article, but this point is important: the Democrats scheme and work to place radicals and activists on the courts, including the highest court in the land. We listen to pablum from the Federalist Society and fight to get weak reeds like Amy Coney Barrett on the high court, where they promptly betray us.

We never learn. If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right. No more Barretts, no more Kavanaughs, no more Roberts.
3 posted on 05/18/2025 10:16:14 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
For weeks after 2018 election day in California, the new process of mail-in ballots changed the entire election day outcome. California was the BETA test for the national 2020 mail-in ballot fraud system. It all links back to the California ballot and illegal alien voter registration operation carried out by Eric Holder.

California is a one-party state, NOT because the voters are stupid (well, some are) but because elections are rigged through many such fraudulent means

4 posted on 05/18/2025 10:21:22 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right.

It would have to be either Steve Bannon or Stephen Miller.

Otherwise, he'll be more likely to be Michael Pence. He would rather be a part of the Swamp.

Now that you're saying it, I think Alito and Thomas are less likely to retire now. So far, Trump is 0-3.

Both Bushes were 1-2. In baseball, they have a .500 batting average.

5 posted on 05/18/2025 10:24:19 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Garland was selected as AG as a stick in the eye to Republicans who derailed his SCOTUS nomination. Garland did all the partisan dirty work the Dems asked him to do. He proved to be the Dem party hack that we thought he would be.


6 posted on 05/18/2025 10:29:45 AM PDT by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; lightman

I don’t understand this convoluted article.

But I know that Merrick Garland (who was a Harvard commencement speaker a few years ago) is Harvard’s disgrace, and Ketanji Brown-Jackson is America’s disgrace!


7 posted on 05/18/2025 10:30:30 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds like what happened under Lyndon Johnson. Ramsey Clark, a left wing nut, and a nut generally irrespective of his political leanings, was named AG to force his father, Tom Clark, who was AG under Truman, to resign from the Supreme Court to pave the way for Thurgood Marshall.


8 posted on 05/18/2025 10:40:10 AM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t think obama is smart enough to be masterminding anything this complex.


9 posted on 05/18/2025 10:42:34 AM PDT by Jeff Vader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

A constellation of dots for the (possible) connecting.


10 posted on 05/18/2025 10:44:09 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bump


11 posted on 05/18/2025 10:47:35 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (Think about it: The Supreme Court is nine lawyers appointed for life by politicians. —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Mark Levin would be my choice.


12 posted on 05/18/2025 10:52:05 AM PDT by batazoid (Natural born citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

later


13 posted on 05/18/2025 10:53:47 AM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead". (We'll go ahead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I think President Trump is positioning Judge Jeanine Pirro for the Supreme Court.


14 posted on 05/18/2025 10:57:48 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Biden was not the mastermind of this scheme. Who was?


15 posted on 05/18/2025 10:59:50 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

.


16 posted on 05/18/2025 10:59:53 AM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

I know less after reading this article then I knew before.

It reads like an AI just randomly threw names into paragraphs.


17 posted on 05/18/2025 11:03:19 AM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Well, the fact that neither is a lawyer kills the idea dead. You don’t have to be, but I can’t imagine that the Senate would bite on that offering. Bannon: to old at 71. A drunk and a loose cannon. Miller. I love the guy. But too polarizing and none of the squishes would vote to confirm.

Cruz or DeSantis


18 posted on 05/18/2025 11:07:30 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Summary:

Building and keeping a republic is difficult.

Demolishing a republic is easy.


19 posted on 05/18/2025 11:23:45 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Joe Biden’s Dept of Justice – Merrick Garland was AG In Name Only for a Specific Reason”

Just like Joe Biden was President in name only.


20 posted on 05/18/2025 11:32:02 AM PDT by antidemoncrat ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson