To: E. Pluribus Unum
Just another back door by Biden…..I’ll give you position so you can protect
me from my multiple crimes.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
As a standalone Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown-Jackson would have been a radical pick. Judge Brown-Jackson was a known activist in the DC District Court
Not to ignore the main point of this article, but this point is important: the Democrats scheme and work to place radicals and activists on the courts, including the highest court in the land. We listen to pablum from the Federalist Society and fight to get weak reeds like Amy Coney Barrett on the high court, where they promptly betray us.
We never learn. If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right. No more Barretts, no more Kavanaughs, no more Roberts.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
For weeks after 2018 election day in California, the new process of mail-in ballots changed the entire election day outcome. California was the BETA test for the national 2020 mail-in ballot fraud system. It all links back to the California ballot and illegal alien voter registration operation carried out by Eric Holder. California is a one-party state, NOT because the voters are stupid (well, some are) but because elections are rigged through many such fraudulent means
4 posted on
05/18/2025 10:21:22 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Garland was selected as AG as a stick in the eye to Republicans who derailed his SCOTUS nomination. Garland did all the partisan dirty work the Dems asked him to do. He proved to be the Dem party hack that we thought he would be.
To: E. Pluribus Unum; lightman
I don’t understand this convoluted article.
But I know that Merrick Garland (who was a Harvard commencement speaker a few years ago) is Harvard’s disgrace, and Ketanji Brown-Jackson is America’s disgrace!
7 posted on
05/18/2025 10:30:30 AM PDT by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sounds like what happened under Lyndon Johnson. Ramsey Clark, a left wing nut, and a nut generally irrespective of his political leanings, was named AG to force his father, Tom Clark, who was AG under Truman, to resign from the Supreme Court to pave the way for Thurgood Marshall.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t think obama is smart enough to be masterminding anything this complex.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
11 posted on
05/18/2025 10:47:35 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(Think about it: The Supreme Court is nine lawyers appointed for life by politicians. —David Horowitz)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
13 posted on
05/18/2025 10:53:47 AM PDT by
chiller
(Davey Crockett: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead". (We'll go ahead))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Biden was not the mastermind of this scheme. Who was?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
16 posted on
05/18/2025 10:59:53 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Joe Biden’s Dept of Justice – Merrick Garland was AG In Name Only for a Specific Reason”
Just like Joe Biden was President in name only.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“California was the BETA test for the national 2020 mail-in ballot fraud system”
Absolutely true. Watched it, was appalled, and realized immediately what they did: wait for the election day results, figure out the target margin that needed phony ballots, then submarine those ballots in to the system with various excuses.
If voting ends at 8 PM on Tuesday, they would have no chance of pulling that stunt. Mail-In voting and counting in overtime gives them that opportunity.
22 posted on
05/18/2025 11:47:33 AM PDT by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson