[AnotherUnixGeek]

As a standalone Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown-Jackson would have been a radical pick. Judge Brown-Jackson was a known activist in the DC District Court

Not to ignore the main point of this article, but this point is important: the Democrats scheme and work to place radicals and activists on the courts, including the highest court in the land. We listen to pablum from the Federalist Society and fight to get weak reeds like Amy Coney Barrett on the high court, where they promptly betray us.

We never learn. If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right. No more Barretts, no more Kavanaughs, no more Roberts.

[MinorityRepublican]

If Trump gets to make another SC nomination, that person must be a "radical activist" for the Right.

It would have to be either Steve Bannon or Stephen Miller.

Otherwise, he'll be more likely to be Michael Pence. He would rather be a part of the Swamp.

Now that you're saying it, I think Alito and Thomas are less likely to retire now. So far, Trump is 0-3.

Both Bushes were 1-2. In baseball, they have a .500 batting average.

[batazoid]

Mark Levin would be my choice.

[pepsi_junkie]

The democrats will all support radical left wing nominees and so will most repoublicans, check the record.

On the other othand no democrats will support anyone to the right of Obama and many repupucans won't either. If it's a radical right winger (i.e. An actual conservative like Thomas) then the GOP will provide almost no support. Again, check the record.