Posted on 08/05/2024 7:49:28 PM PDT by DoodleBob
When you choose to live life without kids, you hear it all — from "Oh, you’ll change your mind!" to "Wow, life must be so easy for you," as if an existence without littles is all last-minute vacations to the Caribbean and a seamless work-life balance. While that’s not a true picture of the PANK (professional aunt, no kids) life — a term coined by bestselling author Melanie Notkin in 2008 — a child-free status is still considered unconventional, despite its rise in popularity.
Case in point: In a resurfaced interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Republican Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance claimed that leaders of the Democratic Party like Vice President Kamala Harris, don’t have a “direct stake” in the country, describing them as, “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too.”
For many, the comments were a painful reminder that no matter how much you achieve at work and in the world, your worth as a woman is still defined by your reproductive status.
In the last U.S. census taken in 2020, nearly 50% of American women under 45 were child-free, and it’s almost certain that group has grown whether by choice or due to health circumstances. In 2023, the U.S. fertility rate dropped to the lowest level since the U.S. began tracking birth rate data in 1979. And the share of U.S. adults younger than 50 without children who say they are unlikely to ever have kids rose 10 percentage points between 2018 and 2023 (from 37% to 47%).
Yet despite the fact that there are more women than ever before opting out of motherhood, the conversation around supporting women, especially those in the workforce, still tends to focus on mothers — a phenomenon that’s understandable given America’s comparably poor paid family leave and childcare policies.
Executive Robyn Dutra gets it. As a creative director and consultant with leadership experience at Estee Lauder Companies and Unilever, she has seen how hard it can be for moms to balance work with family obligations. "I’m deeply supportive of what they’re going through and will fight to the finish to get them the added support they need," says Dutra. "But I’d like to get to a place where an eyebrow isn’t raised if you say you’ve never wanted to have kids. I’d like to get to a place where we’re supporting women and recognizing that family comes in all shapes and sizes — and doesn’t have to mean children."
This is one of the reasons Emmy award-winning TV producer and media consultant Paula Rizzo started Othership at Chief, a group for members who are not moms either by choice or by circumstance. The group's name can be linked to research done by Notkin, who authored the 2014 book, "OTHERHOOD: Modern Women Finding a New Kind of Happiness."
Rizzo, an author of two books, is happily child-free. She and her husband tried to get pregnant a few years ago, but after her second miscarriage, she realized that life without having kids could be deeply satisfying. "I’ll never forget the doctor staring at me after giving me the news that I’d miscarried again, searching for the devastation, waiting for me to burst into tears," says Rizzo. "But I didn’t have that reaction. My husband and I were like, 'OK, let’s see what’s next instead!'"
The decision felt freeing, if a little isolating. The Othership group, which now has 200 members and is growing, is an antidote to that isolation. They meet virtually once a month to talk about some of the issues facing non-moms who work — everything from how friendships change when women have kids to what legacy means for those who choose not to procreate.
Is There a Cost of Being Child-Free?
As any woman who’s on the otherhood track will tell you, there are a certain set of issues that can surface when you deviate from the norm. For instance, one 2017 study published in the journal Sex Roles found that married-with-kids couples felt emotions ranging from disapproval and annoyance to outrage, anger, and even disgust toward married-without-kids couples. Other research has been consistent with this study, finding the voluntarily child-free are often perceived as less fulfilled and even elicit moral outrage. (Just ask JD Vance.)
Those who don’t see parenthood as a moral or biological imperative may still face issues at the office, from both a workload and benefits perspective. Occupational therapist and host of "not a momma life" podcast, Raphie Wagner has worked countless Saturdays and holidays covering for her colleagues who are parents and want to be at soccer games or watch kids open presents on Christmas morning. "All too often it’s those of us who are kid-free who get stuck with the crappy schedules," she says. "And worse, it’s just assumed we’ll work those hours."
Ushering in a New Era of What Family Means
Both Rizzo and Dutra are hopeful that more companies will start to recognize the specific set of issues and, yes, even challenges those who choose the child-free path may face. Cassandra Rose, Senior Director of Human Resources at ClearPoint Health, advocates for women who are on the path of otherhood to make the most of their employee benefits. "The only time you might have to step away from your responsibilities at work isn’t when a baby comes into your life," she says. "I tell women without kids to go to their HR department and ask for more inclusive care policies. Too often, when we take time off, we have to use up our sick and vacation days. There should be another bank of time that accounts for leave you might need to take as a caregiver."
While some larger corporations are starting to employ this policy, if your company isn’t on board with progressive approaches, don’t be afraid to ask. It’s also important to push back if you’re being asked to do more work because you don’t have kids, she adds. "Don’t just take one for the team if you’re not willing to do it," she says. "And if you are willing to do more, document it — and then advocate for yourself when it comes time for promotions, pay increases, and bonuses."
Rose also wants child-free women to feel empowered to use "no" as a complete sentence, and to not let societal norms dictate the boundaries you set for yourself. "I urge women not to let society tell you what’s an acceptable reason to leave work," says Rose. "If you have a need to leave work at 5 p.m. so you can go to the gym, that’s acceptable — and you don’t need to defend your reasoning to others. Defend your choice to yourself, and trust that everything else will fall into place."
Dutra is hopeful that the needle is moving in the right direction. "When it comes to supporting women, we have to recognize that family doesn’t have to mean children," she says. "If we’re truly going to support women, we need to recognize it’s all about choice. What family means is for women to define — or defy."
*Editor's Note: This story was originally published June 2021.
So let’s just ignore all single men or women. Brilliant...that’s the way to get votes
Childless cat ladies are one of the democrats’ most reliable voting blocks. When women get married and have children they tend to vote Republican.
It freaks liberals out to hear that, but it is a simple, easily proven, demographic fact.
An old chief engineer described a test to see if you were irreplaceable on a ship. Stick your hand in a bucket of water and then pull it out. If the water flows back in to where your hand was you are replaceable.
Guess Joan of Arc and Queen Elizabeth I of England were “unpatriotic” - didn’t care about the next generation. Have to check out Boadicea.
Too much Hollywood and Madison Avenue putting out unrealistic views of women.
It used to be that a guy married a girl from the family four farms down.
Somehow, our country really took off under that model.
Hollywood and Madison Avenue have really hurt women.
Notkin. Notkin. Not having kin.
The point of marriage (pre-DNA testing) was to assure men that the children in their home were theirs. Men who have that assurance have an investment in the future and build things like businesses, bridges and space shuttles. Men without that go feral. Women who forego an investment in the future become cat ladies.
“The thing is, men don’t usually have to give up a family for a career, so they have a support system to fall back to.”
Most “careers” are really just a job. Men have a job to support a family.
“Tell that to women who can’t have children..”
There is a difference between those who couldn’t and those who waited until they couldn’t.
Well said.
Well, words mean things.
True
My aunt is N 84 year old childless lesbian who lived monagamously and quietly with her partner for 60 years
She’s also a major Trump supporter who detests wokism and keeps up Saell ask do
Not all are bad news
Yet despite the fact that there are more women than ever before opting out of motherhood
As nature sees it women have only one function in life it’s not to be CEOs of some corporation or vice presidents or presidents!
Compared to raising a crop of healthy and happy children everything else seems quite secondary...
The reason is because - for whatever biological reasons - unmarried and especially childless women are the absolute backbone of the Democrat party. That demographic are precisely the types who are highly controlling busybodies who want the government to dictate every last facet of others’ lives. No, that does not mean all. Yes, I’m well aware that there are exceptions. But the facts speak for themselves. Unmarried women are the ONLY demographic the Democrats win but they win this one group so overwhelmingly that it makes them competitive.
They’re more like childless, crazy cat ladies.
good post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.