Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrew Weissmann Apoplectic at Immunity Decision – SCOTUS: The President IS The Executive Branch
Conservative Treehouse ^ | July 2, 2024 | Sundance

Posted on 07/03/2024 6:31:09 AM PDT by george76

The tip of the Lawfare spear consists of a small group of former DOJ attorneys and Main Justice leftists who helped AG Eric Holder create the DOJ National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) when it was formed on behalf of President Obama.

Lawfare, writ large, are a tribe of leftists who strategically weaponize the justice systems within the DOJ. They are also the main guides, strategists and legal analysts who previously used Robert Mueller and currently use Jack Smith.

The tribe is led by a trio of fellow travelers: Mary McCord, Norm Eisen and Andrew Weissmann.

If you research the group, you will discover that Mary McCord sits at the center of every attack approach deployed against President Trump {CITATION}. The influence of McCord cannot be overstated, while gender fluid leftists like Eisen, Weissmann (and others), wax philosophically about which statutes can be twisted and interpreted to assist their Lawfare strategy du jour.

...

Everything we have watched unfold, from using “The Logan Act” against Michael Flynn, to using “Obstruction” against President Trump and the “Insurrection Act” against J-6 targets, comes from this small crew of effeminate leftists.

The similarity of the behavioral proclivities is an outcome of their tribal synchronicity. Much like the McClintock or Wellesley effect, when you isolate Lawfare individuals into a small tribe, their collective behaviors replicate. These travelers were incubated in the DOJ-NSD.

This crew of Brookings funded Lawfare ideologues was also described by Christine Blasey-Ford as her “Beach Friends.”

Since leaving official government positions, the main trio of Lawfare leadership congregate professionally on MSNBC and feed the leftists in media and politics from their primary cable outlet.

I noted, during a recent flight filled with DC bureaucrats and IC officials (United Airlines), how the drones all watched MSNBC on their seat monitors as if it was a religious service that needed to be attended. It really was a sight to see. Every bureaucrat, active or retired, seated with their laptop under the headrest monitor while typing, texting and DM’ing in unison like synchronized swimmers.

That experience was the first time I realized how the term “NPC’s” or non-Player Characters might have originated as a meme, but the label was eerily accurate.

The alarming aspect to the tribal Lawfare approach, is to realize how this essentially very small group of former DOJ-NSD lawyers commands such an oversized influence on our national politics.

In reality, this crew is likely less than 20 full-time characters with about a half-dozen lawyers used as spokespeople. Essentially, the public voice to keep the hardcore leftists on the optimal message. However, this group also writes the legal strategies for all of the attack approaches used in Atlanta, Georgia (Fani Willis), New York (Alvin Bragg) and DC/FL with Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Within Main Justice, it is Deputy AG Lisa Monaco who takes the Lawfare instructions from the outside group and funnels them back into actionable work within the DOJ (ie to Jack Smith). It’s a similar process as to how the inside and outside group coordinated and used Robert Mueller.

Andrew Weissmann, Mary McCord and Norm Eisen (with occasional guests), can be seen daily watching very closely how their legal briefs, citations and structured legal motions are being used. Yes, it is their written words, their legal briefs, and their filings that are signed by the government officials and submitted into multiple judicial venues.

...

“National Security” as a shield – Remember, Barack Obama and Eric Holder created the DOJ-NSD using the authorities granted to the administrative state by the bureaucracy following 9/11. Specifically, because the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) was created, and within that dynamic the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) was established, DHS would now be the weaponized umbrella organization, and the power granted to the DNI would establish the need for the DOJ-NSD.

In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.

What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms, so that only their ideological opposition became the target of the new national security system. This is very important to understand as you dig deeper.

Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed.

When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.

Eric Holder created the DOJ-National Security Division for exactly the purpose of weaponizing the DOJ to target their political opposition. This is what the DOJ-NSD does under the auspices of “National Security.” The FARA violation monitoring is one of the more well-known operations within the DOJ-NSD, and from that construct you find the original justification for the NSA database monitoring.

The surveillance of Americans shifted around the roles and responsibilities within Main Justice after the DOJ-NSD was created. The National Security Division took over Foreign Agent Registration Act monitoring as well as FISA. Both FARA and FISA required some form of downstream surveillance within the authority of the NSD.

The FBI counterintelligence division became the investigative offshoot to assist the NSD, and due to the tightrope of legal compliance issues, lawyers from the NSD were dispatched into the FBI to give legal assistance on the surveillance side. This is how NSD lawyers like Lisa Page, Tashina Guahar and Kevin Clinesmith end up encircling FBI officials like Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe.

Within this newly created DOJ-NSD, there was no inspector general oversight, so the internal officials were unaccountable, had no reason to worry about anyone looking at them, and they were generally running amok. In 2015 the Office of the DOJ Inspector General requested oversight, and it was Deputy AG Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

We discover just how ridiculous and partisan the NSD became through the outcomes of the Hillary Clinton investigation. The Clinton investigation was operated by the FBI and the unaccountable DOJ-NSD.

Yesterday, in a stunning opinion that destabilized the Lawfare ideologues, the Supreme Court affirmed the Unitary Executive principle around the constitution.

The 6-3 opinion held that the President is “a person alone who comprises a branch of government.” This is important to understand. The Executive Branch is the President.

As noted by reader Alex1689: […] Read the SCOTUS opinion, not from a point of view of apprehension about President Trump (he’ll be fine), but from the point of view of what does this allow him to do in his second term, and what straightjackets does it remove that were a threat during his first term?

To start, the court wrote about powers that carry with them core, absolute immunity, the exercise of which cannot come under question in any forum. It specifically identified:

Pardons

Recognition of foreign governments

Removal of executive branch officials.

If it can’t be questioned . . . It also cannot be the grounds for impeachment, can it?

Let’s repeat: If it’s a core power, the exercise of the core power cannot be grounds for impeachment (*except if done in connection with taking a bribe).

In his first term, there was the threat that if President Trump fired . . .

Rosenstein Barr Fauci

That he would be prosecuted for obstruction of justice or impeached.

That threat is forever off the table now.

He can fire anyone he likes in the executive branch. The straightjacket is gone.

On that point, further, the majority opinion uses strong language consistent with the Unitary Executive theory of the Constitution. The President is “a person alone who comprises a branch of government.”

While there are areas of shared constitutional responsibility, the core powers of the Executive Branch, including personnel, are the President’s alone.

Schedule F

Boom.

While impeachment is a political process within the Legislative Branch, and the Supreme Court is extremely hesitant to overstep their role therein, the High Court did put this sentiment clearly into the opinion about immunity: …“The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.”…

Congress may not criminalize the conduct of the President simply for carrying out his core executive branch duties.

Removal of Executive Branch officials is a core duty, an official act, carrying absolute immunity.

That newly affirmed reality is exactly why Andrew Weissmann and the Lawfare crowd are very alarmed.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: andrewweissmann; attorneys; doj; dojattorneys; ericholder; holder; lawfare; lawfarespear; marymccord; mccord; normeisen; r; weissmann

1 posted on 07/03/2024 6:31:09 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

“SCOTUS: The President IS The Executive Branch”

That’s the thing. The US government and the media only hire the BEST AND BRIGHTEST!


2 posted on 07/03/2024 6:34:12 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Holder is the keystone behind Lawfare.
He still wants a place on the Supreme Court that RBG kept from him.
This is the real reason RBG didn’t retire.


3 posted on 07/03/2024 6:37:16 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Just goes to show that Weissmann, who should have been disbarred, at least, for his corrupt crap, is dumber than dirt. He should be popping bottles over that decision.

That case is more about a security blanket for the former Presidents than Pres Trump.

If they said no immunity, they would still have to convict Pres Trump. All while the cases seem to be falling apart, folks are starting to question legitimacy of Smith and trials won’t happen until after the election. If he wins, all trials over.

As President, he can unleash the DOJ on his predecessors and they have no immunity. And their former staffers, SES types, department heads have even less


4 posted on 07/03/2024 6:46:45 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

If, as The Left are saying, they really believe this ruling gives the President unlimited and unchecked power, expect Biden to begin to exercise that power, soon.


5 posted on 07/03/2024 7:14:22 AM PDT by motor_racer ("Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" - Lavrentiy Beria, J. Stalin Deputy Premier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
If it’s a core power, the exercise of the core power cannot be grounds for impeachment (*except if done in connection with taking a bribe).

Now we know their next plan.

6 posted on 07/03/2024 7:20:29 AM PDT by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Trump 2.0 should TOTALLY transform his executive branch. Make the FBI go away and so much more.


7 posted on 07/03/2024 7:22:49 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

This decision does not coverFLOTUS, Jilly better be careful.


8 posted on 07/03/2024 7:39:32 AM PDT by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: motor_racer

Does this ruling cover Obama acting as puppet master during the Biden administration?


9 posted on 07/03/2024 7:47:50 AM PDT by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

I don’t agree with this article. Maybe the President can’t be prosecuted, but Congress can still impeach if they choose. Nothing in this ruling prevents them.


10 posted on 07/03/2024 7:52:11 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Good article.


11 posted on 07/03/2024 7:58:33 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

BTTT


12 posted on 07/03/2024 8:02:58 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I don’t understand why the lawfare crowd should be especially fearful of this decision. Why is it a special threat to them?


13 posted on 07/03/2024 8:09:08 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The National Security Division of the JustUs dept. was created by obamaumao and eric holder... to then be able to single out opposition party free citizens for surveillance, arrest and all else we have seen. This division created a@@clowns like Weissman and enable the idiotic decision by Pelosi to remove minority named J6 committee member and install Kinzinger and Liz Cheney.

The NSD-DOJ is no longer roped off from the President- they are not unaccountable and therefore— removed from power. Step 1. Step 2. is dismantling all the obama embeds who have RUN with this illegal power, and shut them down.

That is why it is a threat— lawfare is reduced in both billing power and the power for idiotic political lawsuits= all of which Weissman was whining about. Andrea Mitchell, btw is falling apart mentally, and whoever the black guy Marcus is-— he isn’t going to be much more as a bag boy for Benny Thompson the dumba@@ from MS Pelosi had head the committee.

All the lawsuits are likely thrown out— Weissman telegraphing how they will “re-animate” them. He/Mary McCord and Eisen will NOT be able to do this. Obamaumao is liable for the murders of 4 Americans without due process— seriously- the muzzie is in the focus— and not immune, not now.


14 posted on 07/03/2024 8:20:40 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: george76

And not a single LEFTY will read, accept, acknowledge, or possibly even understand this article.


15 posted on 07/03/2024 8:51:58 AM PDT by LTC.Ret (I was MAGA when MAGA wasn't cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Trump 2.0 should TOTALLY transform his executive branch. Make the FBI go away and so much more.

Yes!

Revoke executive order 11491 => federal labor unions gone.

Fire all the neo-Bolshevik civil servants. The civil service law is an unconsitutional encroachment by the legislature on the executive's core power of employing subordinates and assistants.

16 posted on 07/03/2024 9:46:13 AM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

LBJ solidified federal unions in place with legislation. It will take legislation to undo it.


17 posted on 07/03/2024 9:49:45 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Reily
My understanding was that the purpose of the EO was to forestall legislation. However, provoked by your post, I did some checking and found that "President Carter signed Title VII, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, into law as part of the Civil Service Reform Act on October 13, 1978, effective January 11, 1979."

I still would argue that this is a violation of the separation of powers. Some future President could ignore it the way Biden ignores the immigration laws, but with a much better legal basis.

18 posted on 07/03/2024 10:50:08 AM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth

Ok it was Jimmy Carter I was told LBJ. I should have check it on my own.


19 posted on 07/03/2024 12:16:39 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson