Skip to comments.
Review of "The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico" by Bernal Diaz
Gun Watch ^
| June 4, 2017
| Dean Weingarten
Posted on 03/16/2024 5:10:39 AM PDT by marktwain
The American edition, published in 1956, 468 pages, Translated by A.P. Maudsley
The Diaz account is the best history book that I have read. It has all the advantage of a first person account and reads like a well written adventure novel.
The Discovery and Conquest of Mexico by Bernal Diaz del Castillo is the only extant first person account of the campaign under the command of Hernando Cortez from 1519 to 1520. The campaign resulted in the discovery and conquest of the Aztec civilization in Mexico. Cortez himself wrote five long letters to Carlos V in Spain. Parts of them are included in this edition to help explain the narrative. But Cortez' letters were essentially reports of a Conquistador commander seeking favor, and explaining his actions, which were mostly extralegal.
The entire Conquest was a massive verification of the adage that "It is easier to obtain forgiveness than permission."
Bernal Diaz' account is a first person narrative of the entire campaign, with the amazing detail of a foot soldier who is vitally interested in food, women, weapons, and gold. He includes accounts of two separate expeditions before Cortez.
Bernal Diaz made extensive remarks on the use of firearms in his narrative. The initial numbers were tiny, but contributed significantly to the success of the conquest. Of the initial 400 to 500 men under the command of Cortez, there were 16 with horses, 13 with individual guns, four small cannon, "some brass guns" (more cannon), and 32 crossbowmen. The 13 personal guns were almost certainly arquebuses, the first really practical personal gun, with early matchlocks. Diaz mentions "much powder and ball".

Diaz rated the crossbowmen and the "musketeers" about equal in effectiveness. The cannon were extremely effective both as destructive weapons and for their psychological effect. It is hard for modern man to realize how quiet the world was before gunpowder and modern engines. The loudest noise was thunder, often equated with supernatural power. Firearms duplicated the intensity of that noise, at least at close range.
The soldiers of the Conquest spent considerable time on the maintenance of their weapons and armor. Not much has changed in 500 years. They adopted whatever of the enemies weaponry that they found useful. The Spanish quickly appropriated the quilted and compacted cotton armor of the natives, to augment what steel armor they had with them.
The conquest would likely have failed without two recent inventions in Europe, corned gunpowder and portable guns. Corned gunpowder had only been perfected about 50- 20 years previously. Moistening the mix, then pushing it through sieves made a gunpowder that was much more powerful, durable, and resistant to absorbing moisture from the air.
It is unlikely that simple mixtures of gun powder would have survived the trip across the Atlantic; and likely two to three times as much would have been required. The new gunpowder allowed for much smaller, lighter, faster firing and reliable guns, both cannon and arquebuses.
Bernal Diaz was literate, educated, and makes reference to the literature of the time. He shows a keen understanding of tactics, strategy and the importance of various players in the complicated, Machiavellian game of life, death, and power played out by Cortez, Montezuma, and various native allies, especially the Tlaxcalans, one of the few groups not subject to the Aztecs.
The manuscript was published after the authors death, first in 1632 by Friar Alonzo Remon from a manuscript found in Madrid. Several secondary editions were published from that version. People who had read the original manuscript kept in Guatemala, wrote that the published version differed in a number of details from the original. In 1895, a photo copy of the Guatemalan manuscript was furnished to Senor Don Genaro Garcia of Mexico, who published a true version of the Guatemalan text. The A.P. Maudley translation is of that publication.
There are indications that the manuscript was written over a considerable period of time. In one preface, a "day book" was noted as a source. Did Diaz keep, in effect, a diary? We do not know. The work was well under way by 1552, 30 years after the conquest. In those 30 years it would be reasonable that Bernal Diaz had many conversations with his former comrades in arms. He likely took notes. Pedro de Alvarado, one of Cortez' Lieutenants, was made Governor of Guatemala in 1524. Guatemala is where Bernal Diaz was granted his estate as a reward. In the Conquest, Diaz had served under Alvarado a number of times. Different versions show manuscript completion dates of 1568 and 1572.
Diaz gave the native warriors high marks for courage and skill at warfare. He writes of their weapons and tactics. They devised defenses to horses, using traps and captured steel swords; they formed looser formations as a defense against cannon. Many of these adaptations worked for short periods. But the Spanish adapted as well. The Spanish had launches built to to navigate the lake around Mexico City, mounted cannon on them and propelled them with sails and oars. They dominated even the largest Aztec dugout canoes.
The Spanish gained tens of thousands of allies from the Tlaxacans and the liberated subjects of the Aztecs. Cortez promised to rule with justice and good works, based on Christianity. The Spanish insisted on an end to humans sacrifice and cannibalism. It was not a popular decree, at least at first. The priests with the expedition insisted that conversions to Christianity be voluntary.
The Conquest was no cakewalk. The Conquistadors came very close to being wiped out, several times. Diaz was serious wounded numerous times. As a personal guard of the captured Montezuma, Montezuma gave him gold, cotton cloth, and the beautiful daughter of a high ranking Aztec. Montezuma likely thought it cheap insurance. Diaz lost most of it after Montezuma was killed when the Aztecs revolted. The Spanish had to fight their way out of Mexico City. They barely succeeded.
Diaz' account makes clear that both Cortez and Montezuma were world class Machiavellian politicians. They continually lied to each other, their allies, and their men, as the situation required. They jockeyed for position, and worked hard to understand the other and their vulnerabilities. Montezuma was at a disadvantage, because the Conquistadors, their capabilities and weapons were new and unknown. Cortez knew more of the world. Both knew how to make and break alliances to their advantage. Cortez had the disadvantage of having to work through translators for most of his interactions with allies, enemies, and spies. Diaz says the acquisition of Doña Marina(her converted Christian name) in the early part of the Conquest, was critical to Cortez' success. She was a talented translator, shrewd advisor, and companion of Cortez. She later bore him a son.
Diaz' narrative contains numerous remarks on the human sacrifice and cannibalism that were frequently encountered during the Conquest. It was not limited to the Aztecs, but included the Tlaxcalans and the tribes conquered by the Aztecs. At one "cue" or temple, he writes that he found human skulls arranged in such an order that he could determine the number through counting. He calculated that there were 100,000 of them, and emphasized the accuracy of the estimate. Slavery was common to both the native tribes and the Spaniards. The Church insisted on a formal decree from Spain that free Indians could not be made into slaves in New Spain. It took decades to enforce the decree.
I highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the history of the Americas and the early use of personal firearms in warfare. I purchased the earlier 1928 version, and gave several 1956 editions as gifts. They can be had for as little as $2 on the used market.
©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
TOPICS: Books/Literature; History; Military/Veterans; Religion
KEYWORDS: banglist; bernaldiaz; cortez; godsgravesglyphs; history; mexico; pages
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: DIRTYSECRET
Cortez had a huge army of Tlaxcalans(10,000 or more) backing him as they also hated the Aztecs. They were tired of being used as human sacrifices to Aztec gods.
To: texanyankee
Today at such a sale I picked up War of the Roses, a1912 whaling book, and a French canoeing book among others. I got 14 books today and when I get that many I will probably have one or two that I get a few pages into and realize it is not worth the dollar I paid for it. When I am done with them all I will take back the ones I don’t keep {just a couple) for someone else to find. The best times are when the library gets a whole collection of books from an estate. People who collect books for decades tend to have a lot of good ones.
42
posted on
03/16/2024 10:11:01 AM PDT
by
arthurus
( covfefe Re)
To: arthurus
I fear my large collection of books will end up in some trash heap.
My 2 grown kids show no interest in historical accounts as me.
Most of them are paperbacks but a significant amount are hardcover so they could/should fetch a few dollars on ebay.
I doubt a library would be interested except for resale.
To: marktwain
"Some are openly promoting the Aztec religion." Well, that takes heart.
44
posted on
03/16/2024 10:21:02 AM PDT
by
moovova
("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
To: PUGACHEV
Thanks for the detailed response on the extra-legality of Cortez’ actions.
45
posted on
03/16/2024 10:37:45 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: texanyankee
46
posted on
03/16/2024 11:02:44 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: marktwain
The Spanish were punctilious in observing the law during their many conquests. It seems odd to us, but they were obsessive about it. When encountering a native population they always read a proclamation announcing the establishment of Spanish authority and the authority of the church. Of course, there was little chance the natives had any idea of what being said or what it meant, but, to the Spanish, it justified the harshest reprisals if the natives did not convert.
Eventually, Spain and Portugal came into conflict over who had the right to rule where in the New World and the Pope had to step on and settle it to avoid what would probably have been a world war. However, not everyone agreed with the Pope’s decision, and when French pirates plundered Spanish treasure galleons, the King of France justified it by asking to see the codicil in Adam’s will which left the New World to Spain.
47
posted on
03/16/2024 1:27:27 PM PDT
by
PUGACHEV
To: PUGACHEV
When encountering a native population they always read a proclamation announcing the establishment of Spanish authority and the authority of the church. Yes, Bernal Diaz mentions this practice repeatedly.
48
posted on
03/16/2024 1:39:22 PM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: marktwain
*I fear my large collection of books will end up in some trash heap.
My 2 grown kids show no interest in historical accounts as me.*
I got rid of all mine. It’s not like I’ll read them all a second time. It’s more of a trophy case that takes up space.
I do go to the library if there’s one I’d like to reread from 50 years ago. Some of them really had an influence on a young mind.
To: moovova
What i found to most shocking about bernal diaz account was the homosexuality in the aztec and mayan priesthood.
what makes that so crazy intesting is that the same combination of human sacrifice and sexual deviancy is evident in the middle eastern religions at the time of the old testament.
50
posted on
03/16/2024 5:08:12 PM PDT
by
ckilmer
To: texanyankee
Resale is what the libraries do with donations unless they come from Universities and such. Those donations have been a boon to me and provided some good reading for my grandsons. I don ot throw them out hen read. I either return them for re-resale Or give them to my grandkids or to other people who want to read them. There are some of us put here who would much rater read a book than read on-line. it is a lot easier on the eyes.
51
posted on
03/16/2024 7:50:50 PM PDT
by
arthurus
( covfefe Rf)
To: arthurus
I love the library sale room. Don’t mind spending .25-.50 on a random author or subject.
To: texanyankee
[I fear my large collection of books will end up in some trash heap.]
Leave a note in your will to have them donated to a senior center.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson