3 More “Conspiracy Theories” Which Have Just Been Confirmed

End of The American Dream ^ | 11/9/23 | Michael Snyder

[Roman_War_Criminal]

ust because someone labels something a “conspiracy theory” does not mean that it is not true. In fact, in recent years so-called “conspiracy theories” have turned out to be accurate time after time. Of course not every crazy theory that people throw around on the Internet is accurate. In fact, I come across nonsense all the time that is flat out false. In this day and age, deception is coming at us from all angles, and it is so important to think critically. Just because someone says that something is true does not make it true. And just because someone says that something is false does not make it false. Ultimately, we all need to do our own research and come to our own conclusions. In this article, I will discuss 3 “conspiracy theories” which have just been confirmed.

#1 Mainstream Media Organizations Really Did Use Video Footage And Photographs From Reporters That Were Embedded With Hamas On October 7th

There were “photojournalists” that were embedded with Hamas forces during the October 7th terror attacks, and major news organizations in the United States used “footage and photos” from those “photojournalists” in their coverage of the events…

The latest ghoulish development following the slaughter of 1,400 Jews in the Oct. 7 Israeli attack on Israel is quite a shocker.

The AP, CNN, Reuters, and The New York Times used footage and photos from reporters embedded with Hamas terrorists during their slaughter of hundreds of Jews.

These Western media outlets then posted the photos in their coverage of this horrendous surprise attack on Israel.

Just when it seems like the mainstream media can’t sink any lower, somehow they find a way to do so.

So did any of these news organizations have advance knowledge that the attacks were going to take place?

Now that this story has gotten out, the Israeli government “is demanding answers”…

The Israeli government is demanding answers from western media outlets including CNN, Reuters, The Associated Press and The New York Times following a media watchdog report that suggested freelance photographers they each hired may have been embedded with Hamas on October 7th.

The issue – highlighted by Honest Reporting – concerns four freelance photographers from Gaza whose works have been published by the media outlets.

One of the “photojournalists” that has been identified is a man named Hassan Eslaiah.

In one video, he can be seen riding toward the site of a massacre with a grenade in his hand…

There is now video of Hassan Eslaiah riding the back of a bike on the way to a kibbutz massacre.

Eslaiah is seen carrying a grenade.

It certainly appears that Hassan Eslaiah wasn’t just there to report on the attacks.

Needless to say, the mainstream news outlets that had worked with these “photojournalists” are denying any prior knowledge of the attacks and it is being reported that they have cut all ties with them…

All four outlets deny having any prior knowledge of the Hamas attack and insist they have cut ties with the reporters. The New York Times today hit out at Honest Reporting for its ‘vague insinuations’, defending the photographer it had hired.

But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other cabinet ministers are demanding more information.

Hopefully this story will not be brushed under the rug, because we definitely need more answers.

#2 When A Major Sex Trafficking Operation Gets Busted, None Of The Powerful Men That Paid For Sex Is Held Accountable

Have you noticed that none of Jeffrey Epstein’s clients was ever charged with anything?

Jeffrey Epstein arranged for very powerful men to sleep with underage girls for many years, and yet not a single one of those men has ever been held accountable by our courts.

And of course Jeffrey Epstein is no longer around to point a finger at anyone.

Well, now a similar case is making news.

Authorities have arrested three men that were running “high-end brothels” in Massachusetts and Virginia…

A network of “sophisticated” high-end brothels in greater Boston and eastern Virginia provided sex for pay to “elected officials, high tech and pharmaceutical executives, doctors, military officers, government contractors that possess security clearances, professors,” and others, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

“Pick a profession, they are probably represented in this case,” said acting U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Joshua Levy at a press conference announcing the arrests of three people in connection with operating the pricey sex shops.

During the investigation, it was discovered that all potential clients of the brothel were required to provide very specific identifying information…

Any potential “client” was required to complete a form on the websites with their names, email address, phone number and employer in a so-called verification process before proceeding. After verification and conversation with the brothel via phone, prosecutors say that the sex buyers agreed to meet at various places described as “Target Locations,” or high-end apartments.

Authorities now have all of this information, and they are telling us that the list of clients includes a lot of very powerful men…

Prosecutors say that the high-end brothel network serviced customers working in the following professions: “politicians, pharmaceutical executives, doctors, military officers, government contractors that possess security clearances, professors, lawyers, business executives, technology company executives, scientists, accountants, retail employees, and students.”

Do you know what this means?

It means that the authorities know exactly who they are.

But will any of them ever actually go to trial?

I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one.

#3 The Location Of Noah’s Ark

For decades, we have known that the Durupinar formation contains the remains of Noah’s Ark.

If you are not familiar with the Durupinar formation, you can read what Wikipedia has to say about it right here.

The formation is the correct size and shape of Noah’s Ark according to the Bible, and scans of the formation have shown that the Ark is down there.

Now, a team of researchers from universities in the United States and Turkey are telling us what they discovered after they “spent roughly a year analyzing the rock and soil” in the area.

According to the researchers, their tests show that “humans were living at the site” approximately 5,000 years ago…

Scientists excavating a large boat-shaped mound in the eastern mountains of Turkey have announced their tests on the rock and soil samples they collected at the site indicate humans were living at the site 5,000 years ago—the same time frame that some biblical scholars link to the Great Flood from the Bible’s Old Testament book of Genesis.

The research team from three Turkish and American universities has been investigating the theory that the geologic formation is actually the ruins of Noah’s Ark.

According to the test results, there were human activities in the region from 5,550 to 3,000 BC, according to Arkeonews. The mound exists in the Ararat region which was known as Urartu in the ancient past.

My hope is that they will fully excavate the site as soon as possible.

But even if the remains of Noah’s Ark are fully unveiled for all the world to see, a lot of people will still refuse to believe that it is true.

And that is because most people simply believe whatever they want to believe whether the evidence supports it or not.

In my brand new book entitled “Chaos”, I share some absolutely jaw-dropping research that shows that the God of the Bible really is the one true God that created all things.

Some people will read the book and will be persuaded.

Others will go to great lengths to imagine reasons why what I have written cannot be true.

In the end, we all get to choose what we want to believe.

But whether you want to believe it or not, the truth is that God really has been orchestrating celestial events and the course of human history for thousands of years.

[KarlInOhio]

Was the “photojournalist” a real, trained photographer or just a terrorist with a GoPro camera picking up a few extra bucks from AP?

[Farmerbob]

I imagine it looked more like a flatboat, and after the water receded it would have been dismantled for housing, pens, firewood.

[Robert DeLong]

I can look at the picture, do you see evidence of a body of water? I’d say there was water there at some point in time that caused erosion, like say perhaps a flood situation?

[Blood of Tyrants]

The latter most likely.

[hecticskeptic]

I imagine it looked more like a flatboat, and after the water receded it would have been dismantled for housing, pens, firewood.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I doubt much got dismantled.... Since it came to rest on the mountain, I would imagine that it also served as temporary quarters until the water receded to the point where they could get off the mountain. There might have been enough supplies onboard to look after them for years but besides, growing crops and other husbandry activities etc. isn’t that great on mountains.....and so I think it would be an objective to get off the mountain as soon as they could. Scriptures say that Noah was building it for 120 years and there is no record of how many others were employed in the effort. As a structure that large, I doubt that much of it would get disassembled since there really wasn’t any need to do that.

I got interested in this topic years ago and was fascinated by the amount of literature that was found concerning an expedition by the Russians in 1916... way too much literature and records for it to be an obvious hoax that they found the ark. If I had the time and resources to research anything, it would be to first get to the bottom of some of that bit of history to establish the veracity of it.

[Openurmind]

It appears to be cooled Pyroclastic flow. Lava weathers very slowly compared to everything around it.

But what I was getting to was that your statement implies that it is a boat and that it did float at some point. So seeing how it is not a boat when water was there last is irrelevant.

Butfrom what I have read it about the geology it was formed under water millions of years ago.

[Openurmind]

But I also need to explain that in no way do I discredit the concept of a flood. Geology around the world does indeed indicate a major flood event. But it doesn’t fit the timeline the Bible tries to claim. In fact the origin of the flood story was plagiarized from the Sumerian writings a thousand years earlier.

[MeganC]

“Everyone with a cell phone claims to be a “photojournalist” these days.”

They are. Nothing in the Constitution says you have to have a degree from a communist university to be a member of the press. Numerous court decisions have affirmed the right of anyone to act as a reporter.

[Robert DeLong]

But what I was getting to was that your statement implies that it is a boat and that it did float at some point. So seeing how it is not a boat when water was there last is irrelevant.

We do not know that to be the case. According to his report, scans elude to it being a boat structure. No digging has begun. No I wasn't implying that it is a boat. In fact, I started with that the Ark, #3, has not been proven and remains that way, but that it looks promising. Perhaps I should have stated why it looks promising, because of scans etc. Sometimes we all take short cuts thinking our comments, in my case implying that it is not proven at all, as being sufficient so as to not get verbose, or just to be lazy. 🤣

I further said that if it is proven, there will be people who will deny it, and then added; how will they explain it being there.

That picture is grainy, and thus gives the appearance of being a lava flow, however, if you look at this picture, one gets a vastly different impression of the landscape in question. The other picture, in my opinion, is the lidar scan image.

Here is that other picture taken from Wikipedia:

Lidar scan image? That impression at the bottom of the image sure looks like a boat to me:

[The_Harlequin]

Oh, well. At least we can still say that we landed on the Moon. . . Or did we???

[Openurmind]

Digging was done, The rock is aged the same as all the rest around it, and the Geology is absolutely solid.

This is grasping at straws to invent something that is just not there. Just like the 15th century young earth movement. All logical evidence of factual geology completely refutes it beyond any reasonable doubt.

[EnderWiggin1970]

It covered the entire earth, so there was no "high water mark" like when a high tide goes X distance up a beach. By definition all was covered.

It's interesting that most people think the Bible says the entire earth was covered but evolutionists (not science) claim otherwise. Actually evolutionist academics do commmonly believe the entire earth was covered in water early in its history (see for example https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/04/harvard-scientists-determine-early-earth-may-have-been-a-water-world/. But the evidence they cite correlates with Genesis 1:2, not the kataklusmos of Noah's time. So the difference is that evolutionists believe the earth was completely covered in water once, while Genesis records that it was covered twice. Which is funny when you encounter extreme skepticism from people who find the whole idea of the earth being covered outlandish.

[Semper Vigilantis]

“politicians, pharmaceutical executives, doctors, military officers, government contractors that possess security clearances, professors, lawyers, business executives, technology company executives, scientists, accountants, retail employees, and students.”

Let's see... which of these might be useful in covering up an epidemic, sneaking garbage into medicine, making and hiding a killer 'vaccine', quashing any online or printed information regarding the source ore treatment of a virus, who might benefit from from panic buying and stockpiling...

My money is on 'ling-ling' being available this evening, Senator/General/Mr. chairman...

[9YearLurker]

Look at the listed professions.

That wasn’t a brothel, it was a compromise operation. Likely operated by the Chinese (and thus protected by our captured government).

[Robert DeLong]

You are right, there has been some digging bit not enough to get down to what may or may not be the Ark.

I'll defer to you about the geological aspect of the area, because it's not something that ever interested me to begin with. Thus I have no knowledge, or even an opinion on the topic.

I also never said it was true, nor did I imply that it was true. I stated that if it is proven to be true, then those denying it need to explain how the Ark got there. Just a statement, and not one made with anything other than information provided & an assessment regarding deniers if proven true. 🙂

[Openurmind]

“I stated that if it is proven to be true, then those denying it need to explain how the Ark got there.”

Being hypothetical. I understood. I was just making the point it will never be proven to be true because based on geological fact it can’t be proven to be true. This is why they always use the terms “may” and “might” in these articles.

The recent article about this Ark find was simply a marketing ad in an effort to increase new tourist traffic to that area of Turkey. And probably also to try and procure new funding for other digs.

[x]

#3 The Location Of Noah’s Ark

Kentucky, right?

[Robert DeLong]

Okay, understood. 👍 🙂

[BrandtMichaels]

Your post is a breath of fresh air. Too many skeptics for my liking. The footprint of the ark is similar to the modern ocean-going barge. This is the most stable boat to be in under high seas, winds, storms etc.

From my research I’d conclude the 2 paired animals were juveniles or the youngest age chosen to survive a year+ in harsh conditions. Also most animals have defense mechanisms where under high stress many of them hibernate thereby reducing needs for added food and waste removal.

Here’s a link that explains the hydroplate theory (replaces plate-techtonics) authored by Dr. Walt Brown, a scientist who has spent over 4 decades refining this theory as well as all the reasons evolution does not work at creationscience.com.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xq6kUbLzYCc