Posted on 07/31/2023 5:57:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Media finally covering rise in heart problems, but blames it on Covid virus and ignores role of experimental jabs
The propaganda machine is going to have to work overtime to hide the crisis ahead
A recent study. revealing young Americans have seen a 30% increase in heart attack deaths since the spring of 2020 is puzzling mainstream media pundits who must have forgotten about the experimental Covid jabs forced onto the world right at that exact same time.
NBC’s the Today show reported, “A national study from Cedars Sinai hospital shows the deaths related to heart attacks increased across every age group since the spring of 2020, but the group that saw the biggest increase isn’t who you might think… The relative increase in heart attack-associated deaths among 25-44-year-olds was a staggering 30%… Experts are still working to figure out why young people are so impacted.”
An expert interviewed in the news report expressed concern the Covid virus itself may be harming people’s cardiovascular systems and increasing the likelihood of blood clot formation.
The report also explained studies have connected Covid-19 with myocarditis, obviously ignoring the massive links between the Covid jabs and heart inflammation.
A person cited in the report even claimed the Covid virus itself is much more likely to give someone myocarditis than the experimental shot.
NBC Senior Medical Correspondent Dr. John Torres was brought on the program to counter those who think the Covid “vaccines” are behind the sharp rise in heart problems.
When NBC anchors asked Dr. Torres if he had advice for young people who have had Covid and may be afraid of experiencing a heart issue, the Big Pharma shill laughably suggested they get a Covid vaccine and...
(Excerpt) Read more at infowars.com ...
I’m sure its not the vaxx or anything. 🙄
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a combination of racism & homophobia...
“Whatever could it be?”
That’s easy enough to answer. You could try actually reading the paper that the InfoWars writer links to in the article that you posted.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839603/
You probably won’t like what it says since the one thing never mentioned at all as a possible cause are the Covid vaccines.
But then what would the research scientist doing the study know anyway, compared to InfoWars?
Here’s what the study has to say about possible causes:
“The exact drivers of excess ischemic heart disease mortality seen during the pandemic remain unclear, although many probable and potential causes have been identified. For instance, there is now abundant evidence of how patients with pre-existing or newly developed cardiovascular conditions have experienced gaps and delays in access to care, especially during periods of COVID-19 surge.
Additionally, mounting data demonstrates that a proportion of COVID-19-affected individuals are at increased risk for thrombogenic events, including acute coronary events, either during or following the acute infection phase.
It is also possible that the excess in cardiovascular risks observed during earlier phases of the pandemic was associated to generally more severe COVID-19 illness caused by more virulent variants of SARS-CoV-2.
To further understand the nature and potential origins of excess mortality attributed to ischemic heart disease during the pandemic and their changes over time, we analyzed national vital statistics data to comprehensively examine and compare temporal trends in mortality rates across demographic groups and geographic regions in the United States.
“As shown in recent reports,18 the pandemic can augment absolute differences in outcomes in certain population subsets while augmenting relative differences in outcomes in others.
Accordingly, we found that although older compared to younger adults continued to experience the greatest absolute magnitudes of excess AMI risk during the pandemic; younger adults experienced the greatest relative increase in excess AMI-associated mortality. Notably, the death rate increased more in males than females when considered in either absolute or relative terms, particularly during the fourth and most recent epoch.
Importantly, even while AMI-associated mortality rates have recently overall improved along with trends in all-cause mortality during the pandemic, yet the relative disparity in excess AMI-associated deaths among certain at-risk subgroups such as younger aged males has persisted.
“There are several potential explanations for the increased AMI-associated mortality excess in patients with COVID-19. Typically, AMI and cardiovascular death typically do not present until years to decades after de novo development or worsening of pre-existing risk factors.
However, SARS-CoV-2 infection may activate or accelerate the development of pre-existing subclinical coronary artery disease, which may be prevalent, particularly among younger-aged men with clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors.
While de novo rapid development of AMI during or after SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely to be uncommon; such cases have been reported among individuals without known pre-existing cardiovascular risk traits – especially males affected by more severe forms of COVID-19 illness.
Proposed mechanisms for the thrombogenicity associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection include downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2), leading to dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, oxidative stress damage, endothelial cell dysfunction, and complement-mediated coagulopathy and microangiopathy.
Studies have consistently shown that males, independent of age, are more likely to develop more severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection than females. This male bias could have contributed to the predominance of excess AMI-associated mortality seen among males in our analyses.
Psychological stressors associated with the pandemic may have also played a role in triggering events leading to excess AMI-associated mortality. Mental stress-induced ischemia has been shown to be associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes and disproportionately affects young women, which could contribute to the excess of AMI-associated mortality seen among young females in our analyses.
Indeed, the effects of social distancing and stay-at-home mandates, reductions in outpatient visits and rehabilitation services, and deferment of elective procedures are all likely to have contributed to the overall excess of AMI-associated deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Importantly, however, we observed improved and yet persistent relative excess in AMI-associated deaths even as health delivery services have adapted to manage care during the most recent surge of the generally less virulent Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2.
Actually reading the study is cheating.
You’re supposed to just accept the spin.
“I do have a relation who is an epidemiologist as well as internal medicine.”
That gives you expertise by association. Saves all that studying time.
And when marxists get confused about how to promote their marxist agenda when they don’t have actual corresponding facts; their simple solution is just to make up different facts and declare that their the bullet points prove their point even though they’re outright abject liars.
Look underneath the financing of anything that justifies the COVID lockdown or the COVID Shots and You will Find that Big pharma is behind the study, and the payments to the researchers because they are absolutely categorically and undeniably corrupt.
He’s accustomed to building a case brick by carefully-proven brick.
gaslight
When it comes to defending the cruel vexxationation system, and demonizing those on FR whose bodies have not yet been snatched, or not yet fully snatched, TexasGrater, PeelEm, Gassy, MissingMyMojo, DiscoDuck, Fewry...maybe a few others...seem to constitute a murderer’s row of psychological abuse and propaganda. Ongoing financing by MI6 or an equivalent foreign agency must be considered as a possibility.
According to the actual data, the jump in heart mortality began after October 2020 — a year after the virus had been around, but just when the vaccines became available. You decide.
It’s a BS paper. We are being lied to. You like being lied to because you are a psychopath.
spring of 2020... was that before the vax?
The problem with a study like this is we don’t know much about the health status of the people to begin with.
I’d imagine that obese, unmotivated people got more obese and unmotivated with the lockdowns. Drug and alcohol addicts did more drugs and alcohol.
What is hard for the covid-as-cause-of-heart-attacks people to counter is the rise in athlete deaths since the vaxseem and lack of rise in deaths of some people, such as Amish, who were not vaccinated but get a regular workout from manual labor.
Somebody needs to do a large study using matched pair analysis where a series of people with a similar profile to each other on a range of attributes, one vaxxed and one not, are matched to each other and have the same tests for the same markers of conditions.
A large % most likely from vaccine, but also, today’s folks are way more sedentary, and eat junk food like it’s going out of style, BUT you wouldn’t expect to see heart problems at such young ages, so once again, the 30% is most likely due to the vaccines. Some “may be” associated with being overweight and not active.
(Whatever could it be?)
Global Warming?
The New Ice Age?
Misuse of Pronouns?
According to the actual data, the jump in heart mortality began after October 2020 — a year after the virus had been around, but just when the vaccines became available. You decide.
Exactly!!!
In spite of what the $hot $hills attempt to twist, with their Pfizerlogic.
👍🏻👍🏻
they included 2020 in the study to infer that the rise since before the vax is 30%... when the rise in 2020 was not as significant of an increase. since the vax... wow what an increase.
Probably a combination of both Covid and the jab.
[[It’s too basic. ]]
Yep
What is needed are stats from those who,suffered heart attacks, BUT who did not have covid- and compare those deaths/problems whichever the case may be, with those who had covid but who refused vaccinations- that would give a clearer picture of what was going on and why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.