Posted on 05/10/2023 7:15:23 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Anyone who has watched and heard E. Jean Carroll for even a brief time realizes she is a delusional nutcase living in her own self-important fantasy world. Much like Norma Desmond of "Sunset Boulevard." In fact, Carroll gives off strong Norma Desmond vibes.
Unfortunately for Carroll her fantasy world is doomed to be shattered once her bogus case reaches appeals court.
PING!
It’s really a shame because having followed this story, the likelihood of it being true is zero.
Regardless, there was no evidence to support his allegation. None. Hearsay should not be the only evidence.
Remember...that pic was in 1987...8 or 9 years before her fantasy. And there's a big difference between 42 and 52.
Another thing...she was just starting out in 1995/96...Anyone think he read her column in that woman's magazine or saw her on the telly?? Ridiculous...
Indeed the judgement was made before the trial even started TDS ignorance on the march.
Imagine that even in New York City that jury couldn’t bring itself to conclude that she had been raped.
Based on her public statements before the trial I think this was a good old fashioned “she had it coming” verdict.
They decided a woman who goes on about rape being sexy and writes fantasies about being raped couldn’t possibly have really been raped.
They wanted so hard to find against Trump and yet they couldn’t bring themselves to completely side with her.
The Dem playbook, repeated over and over. Every Time!
Clarence Thomas
Kavanaugh
Trump...
and how many others?
A relative was telling me how it was normal not to remember things with the trauma of being raped. However, you need evidence in a legal case.
It is also totally unbelievable that someone as prominent as Trump would be raping women in department store dressing rooms. Unlikely for anyone to be doing that. One of the stories with Clinton was he raped a woman in a hotel room at a convention, when she was seeking some favor for her business. That is more plausible.
It is like the accusation that Kavenaugh was drugging and gang raping girls at prep school parties. That doesn’t make sense. I am sure some bad things go on with sex etc. at prep schools etc., but it isn’t plausible. Those girls’ parents would react.
“In September 2017, Martin sent an article making fun of Trump — who she called ‘Orange Crush’ — to Carroll, and followed it up with another message saying “this has to stop” and “as soon as we’re both well enuf [sic] to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty.” Carroll responded: ‘TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet.’”
https://www.businessinsider.com/e-jean-carroll-rape-corroborator-addresses-anti-trump-views-2023-5
We know where “Orange” might stem from.
“Crush” might stem Trump being a big (or powerful) guy.
Women tend to favor big powerful men and should expect to bear the weight when consensual genetic selection gets underway.
Yep, they play predictably dirty
I don’t understand. You’re actually sorry that it’s not true?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.