It’s really a shame because having followed this story, the likelihood of it being true is zero.
Regardless, there was no evidence to support his allegation. None. Hearsay should not be the only evidence.
“In September 2017, Martin sent an article making fun of Trump — who she called ‘Orange Crush’ — to Carroll, and followed it up with another message saying “this has to stop” and “as soon as we’re both well enuf [sic] to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty.” Carroll responded: ‘TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet.’”
https://www.businessinsider.com/e-jean-carroll-rape-corroborator-addresses-anti-trump-views-2023-5
We know where “Orange” might stem from.
“Crush” might stem Trump being a big (or powerful) guy.
Women tend to favor big powerful men and should expect to bear the weight when consensual genetic selection gets underway.
I don’t understand. You’re actually sorry that it’s not true?