PING!
It’s really a shame because having followed this story, the likelihood of it being true is zero.
Remember...that pic was in 1987...8 or 9 years before her fantasy. And there's a big difference between 42 and 52.
Another thing...she was just starting out in 1995/96...Anyone think he read her column in that woman's magazine or saw her on the telly?? Ridiculous...
Indeed the judgement was made before the trial even started TDS ignorance on the march.
Imagine that even in New York City that jury couldn’t bring itself to conclude that she had been raped.
Based on her public statements before the trial I think this was a good old fashioned “she had it coming” verdict.
They decided a woman who goes on about rape being sexy and writes fantasies about being raped couldn’t possibly have really been raped.
They wanted so hard to find against Trump and yet they couldn’t bring themselves to completely side with her.
A relative was telling me how it was normal not to remember things with the trauma of being raped. However, you need evidence in a legal case.
It is also totally unbelievable that someone as prominent as Trump would be raping women in department store dressing rooms. Unlikely for anyone to be doing that. One of the stories with Clinton was he raped a woman in a hotel room at a convention, when she was seeking some favor for her business. That is more plausible.
It is like the accusation that Kavenaugh was drugging and gang raping girls at prep school parties. That doesn’t make sense. I am sure some bad things go on with sex etc. at prep schools etc., but it isn’t plausible. Those girls’ parents would react.