I wanna know why this freak hasn’t been stomped into a mudhole by an angry father.
This POS would disappear if he lived in my neighborhood.
I can imagine a normal young girl attending school in an outfit which might be a little bit risque — skirt too short, cleavage too revealing, whatever.
In such a case, a teacher might take the student aside and explain that her appearance was a distraction in the classroom and that more appropriate attire should be worn.
This sort of conversation is not unusual.
But just imagine this Canadian teacher trying to explain to a young girl that the young girl’s appearance was a distraction in the classroom.
Too funny! lol
Canada has turned into a perverted cesspool run by a kakistocracy of liberals.
It’s sexual harassment. Openly sexual displays should not be permitted in a workplace environment. This has been agreed and written into law pretty much everywhere in the Western world since like the 1970s or so.
There you go Mr. Philosopher it’s not that hard to make the argument.
We can then make an additional argument that this is sexual predation and grooming of children and that this person should be in a psych ward or a prison and not a classroom.
“Good argument” according to who?
The fact that this FREAK feels comfortable doing this in a classroom with students shows that the school board needs to be replaced immediately.
Even many people on the right have a difficult time speaking against sexual deviancy. Homosexuality? Seems most these days have no problem with it, but sexual immorality (of all kinds) is a big cultural negative. People—even on the right—say what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own bedrooms is their business. Get a clue! This stuff never stays just in the bedroom. This weirdo is exactly where the slippery slope of “not my business” eventually leads.
BTW, I agree with the privacy of bedroom principle…in principle, but that’s where the line needs to be drawn. Keep your crap in private where it belongs!
There was a time when teachers were hired, it was expected that not only would they teach a given subject matter, but they themselves would be role models and reflect the constructive values of the community. When a bizarre, troubled person like that is hired by a community, it either truly reflects the values of that community, or its an overt effort to corrupt and indoctrinate susceptible, impressionable and very vulnerable adolescents.
As a woman and a lady, the only person I want seeing my nipples is my husband and my children when they were breastfeeding.
It is grossly unprofessional to be sporting fake books with dart nipples. It is an attempt to sexualize children.
I would tell this freak to their face that they are unfit to teach my child and demand that my child be removed from that classroom.
The philosopher preferences his question on ability to teach. The guy might be the best teacher ever but the kids will be distracted by his appearance and this will interferes with his effectiveness as a teacher.
I imagine the argument would be similar to, “No shirt, no shoes, no service.”
The Teacher is deliberately dressing up in a way that novelizes a prominent feature of female anatomy which is degrading to women and unnatural. It creates an impression that a biological feature is a novelty.
Not every feature of anatomy is to be displayed outrageously. There is a dress code for professional work environments where kids are present.
I'd be willing to bet a substantial amount of money that if his computer were to be forensically investigated, you'd find a boatload of kiddie porn.
This is an example of a man getting turned on by dressing as a near naked woman. This demented man teaches shop to high school boys. Why isn’t the school worried about protecting student boys from sexual assault, which is what this demento is doing. Obviously homosexual.
I read the school said he is a good teacher, but I read the students were posting videos of him. Does anyone know if the students are complaining? The only thing I heard was a student said he used to be a man, so the school probably can’t fire him.