Posted on 09/01/2022 1:32:33 AM PDT by dennisw
Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it's hard to see.
Steve Kirsch 32 min ago Executive Summary We’ve always assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly.
However, most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose for the second dose. It may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias).
But this explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.
The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.
So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.
The data from the Social Security Administration death master file (ages 18 to 55) I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS. This is data you are not supposed to see. The mortality increase (60% at peak) is huge. That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.
There is only one possibility that fits that: the COVID vaccine.
The peak is September 9, 2021. -------- EXCERPT!
We present to you...
Warriorposter Winston Smith!
No, Pfauci is a vile creature.
He tortured orphaned children (involuntary administration of experimental drugs) and beagles (sand flies).
You’re just a midwit troll.
Begone.
Troll status *reconfirmed*.
This is one disjointed mishmash of nastiness. I agree with the parts about the lockdowns, the deaths clustering in the elderly, the vaccines not being made available until after the election, putting Covid patients into nursing homes, false accusations against Trump, etc.
The rest is just the same old sickminded nasty stuff.
And you once again claim I wrote I wrote something I never did: ”I don’t recommend people get them” I never wrote that.
Ever consider these nutty easily-disproved vax doomer claims are a “look squirrel”? Of course not. But they are.
Have a nice day and a pleasant tomorrow.
Not sure if you’re retarded.
The deaths have hit. All cause mortality in under 60s off the charts.
This article is retrospective. The deaths have hit. All cause mortality under 60 is grotesquely high. Pay attention, goofball.
What you did write is:
I have not been vaccinated. I have never encouraged anyone to get vaccinated, nor even hinted they should. I have no reason to be “in denial”.
Close enough.
From this post.
Oh, almost forgot:
TROLL.
FLAWLESS VICTORY.
“I have yet to see an impartial analyses of these ridiculous claims actually validated.”
“It may be that these mRNA shots do cause side effects of a lasting nature but it’s impossible to tell.”
No analysis? Impossible to tell? Maybe because the vaccines NEVER WERE TESTED?!? What do you think?
My biggest problem is they say the only way forward is the VAX. With natural immunity, “THEY” still want you Vaxxed, WHY?
Great question.
My guess is it has something to do with CONTROL.
Ping me if you get an answer from any of the FR Resident Swarmers/$hot $hills.
TIA
NOBODY ever said that the vax always kills everyone. To present those who are warning against the vax is deceitful.
You would be well served to knock off with the innuendos and hyperbole. It would boost your credibility an awful lot, which as this point is lower than bidens poll numbers.
There were differences in batches. Some batches of the so called vaccine were know to cause more problems than others.
There's also the strong possibility that some people got saline injections and think they are vaxxed and are not.
Also, when the vaxes first came out, there was the issue of keeping them cold enough. Now that is never mentioned. So if they weren't kept cold, what did that do to the vax? Compromise it enough that it wouldn't cause the side effects?
Nobody is glad that people are injured and dying from the vaxxes. But to deny it is foolish, because it is known to happen.
If someone is going to do something dangerous, it's compassion to warn them of the consequences. But the decision is ultimately theirs.
Sounds like *someone* is very familiar with FR history.
IBTZ
Covid is over.
There are two groups of people that refuse to let it die.
Fauci and the leftist.
The anti-vax grifters and their followers.
Two very different groups of people on the same mission, Keep Covid alive.
Answer this question.
If by now someone didn’t get vaccinated, and will not get vaccinated, why on Earth are they continuing with the dramatic hysteric anti-vax news?
I’m encouraging people to go live their life. Stop worrying. Stop living in fear of a vaccine they’re never going to receive.
Many here that scoff at these threads have not been vaccinated.
Some have, but I don’t assume I know who has or hasn’t been.
It’s a personal matter.
It doesn’t really matter to me.
Most of the videos you listed were before Operation Warp Speed.
I saw them too.
I’m sure many people that watched those videos were shocked.
But now, 2 1/2 plus years later, we’re all wiser, and knowledgeable.
The desired impact from such videos is gone.
In order to get people to come to your web-site and sell ads on your web-site or subscriptions you need fresh new material.
Wouldn’t you agree?
Hence the new fresh material people like Steve Kirsch keeps pumping out.
But why are the unvaxxed reacting as if it’s March of 2021? 3 months after the vaccines came out.
It’s over.
Good list...may want to add...”possible preventives and protocols (ie. Vit d, etc) were not pushed, and some protocols were banned”
It’s not over until the pendulum swings back.
Since the powers that be are not letting it die, but instead pushing out new untested vaxes on the duped populace based on fear porn over a mild cold, no, those of us who are warning about the dangers of those injections will not stop warning others about it.
If the government and the medical community stop pushing useless, ineffective EUA injections that do a better job at provoking side effects than it does at protecting people from the sniffles, then there’s nothing to warn others about.
I've written this previously, but I think it's worth repeating...
One of the most vital and important (yet perhaps boring) elements in legitimate clinical trials, is the consistent, routine, accurate, and timely collection and recording of side-effect and efficacy data. Trials usually run from two to ten years, with meaningfully large test and control groups. Indeed, the FDA's own websites clearly state that "It's the clinical trials that take so long--usually several years," says Sandra Kweder, M.D., deputy director of the Office of New Drugs in the CDER.
With all this data being collected soberly, a full assessment of the benefits AND side effects can be determined. Things like adverse effects, fatalities, and the like can be observed AND recorded and also vetted (maybe Bob wasn't killed by the shot...or maybe he was).
Not only that, the long time-series of data allows not just for an immediate calculation of vaccine efficacy (VE) but the observation of VE over time, to see if the impact decays and with what kind of pattern (good for a long time then a speedy drop, gradual decline, immediate drop etc).
That's what should have happened with these shots.
Instead, we got a few months of testing, a high VE, and the "all clear" for EUA. The EUA was not fully explained in the context I provided, with a strong caveat emptor warning. Anyone who offered the context I provided was an "antivaxxer."
To be sure, the very early results in the spring of 2021 were ok....cases declined (though that may have simply been a seasonal decline - it would have been nice to assess that possibility with a long-term trial...), and VE held up.
Then we got reports of bad side effects, sickness, and tragically fatalities. Here is where the absence of controlled clinical trials was revealed: there was NO centralized, homogeneous, controlled collection of these side-effects. It was chiefly citizen reporting, requiring the development of citizen databases...a sort of Nachumlist for shots.
Because this very quickly descended into political science vs medical science, anyone voicing concern about these shots on the basis of this citizen reporting was demonized. What made many people realize this was political science, was that just a few months earlier, "respected" people like Christine Grady ( Fauci's wife) were saying basically the same things, e.g., circa February 2021-
57:26 “…should COVID vaccines be mandated for healthcare providers?” My response is the following…in many healthcare institutions, healthcare workers are required to take flu vaccines…in order to take care of patients, in order to protect the patients. I think that…where we are in the history of this pandemic, I don’t think mandating is the right choice at this point, for several reasons. We still need more data…the two vaccines that are being distributed are under an Emergency Use Authorization – they are not approved vaccines (emphasis from Dr. Grady)…and there is this background of concern about politicization…and distrust…that I think it's a mistake to force people to take it. So I don’t think we should be mandating vaccines.
We...ain't that a kick in the head!?!
Fast-forward to today...we have most of the nation (if not planet) having received shots or natural immunity, and no legitimate, controlled long-term clinical trial. There is now statistical evidence of VE waning over a few months, necessitating boosters (that wasn't known when the EUA was authorized...that'd have been a nice little detail to tell the nation but, ya know, we didn't have time for long-term trials...).
We had weekly if not daily media stories happily chirping when the unvaxxed die of the virus, goalpost moving re: lying that the shots were all about lessened symptoms when they were only approved for PREVENTION, and if anyone who HAS gotten a shot dies of what is clearly a reaction, that news is suppressed or ridiculed. Immunity no good, but shot is good. It is so comical that people who used to question authority - like musicians and artists - are now DEMANDING that we obey authority. When punk rockers are anti-shot and Dave Grohl of Flu Pfizers is pro shot, you know we're in the upside-down.
I'll say it again: this isn't the flu. This is a nasty virus that can f you up, especially if you have comorbidities and are in an advanced age bracket. If you want to get the shot on medical grounds, I will never call you a sheep. Optimizing your medial utility curve to is YOUR business, not mine. Further, if you are forced to get it on employment/financial grounds, while there are always options I will never call you names if you take the plunge. And, as noted, JimRob took the shot and he's hardly sheeple.
Alternatively, there is PLENTY of ANECDOTAL evidence to wonder just what is the long-run cost/benefit analysis of these shots, and we 20 months into the effective uncontrolled clinical trial of these messenger RNA shots. I won't dismiss this evidence, but to your point evidence isn't proof. I also detest sloppy "conservatives" who do a terrible job of editing and reporting, i.e. American Thinker, Gateway Pundit, et al. It's like they took the left's stoopid pills.
Where's the Tylenol? /rant
Strange how the $hot $hills are a-okay with pivoting from deaths and adverse effects, of these horrid $hots.
Nothing to see, here…except CDC “facts” and “stats”.
It’s “over, now”, you know.
🙃
Yet VAERS data can be believed because shut up.
ALL OTHER CDC is questionable. VAERS is sancrosanct.
Because... why? White hats guarding the servers? Buildings? Personnel? Connectivity?
Re: 50 - Kirsch is big believer in VAERS.
It’s the pure holy grail of data that co-sponsored by the CDC, the CDC apparently just can’t corrupt by any means.
It’s pure. Clean. Self-correcting. And the CDC can’t get to it.
Right?
Right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.