Posted on 05/04/2022 11:15:43 AM PDT by conservative98
Meet Elizabeth Deutsch. She's currently a law clerk for Justice Breyer.
And, in my humble opinion, she's the most likely person to have leaked the draft Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs, purporting to overturn Roe v. Wade.
🧵 pic.twitter.com/V8mfc5hG2I— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) May 4, 2022
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Yep,almost every leftard is suspect.
“i would like to know what her parents do to afford worthless degrees in Gender at a school in London“
***************************************************************************
Well, if she learned to separate male baby chickens from the females, there could be value in that.
Amit Jain, Elizabeth Deutsch: both circumstantial, for now.
Exactly, who wouldn't be proud to have the world know that you took a loan, of course you want paid for you by taxpayers, to get a masters in "Gender".
We are just cheap labor doing the work the FBI won’t do...
Stupid move on his part for admitted speculation.
A deep dive on any female clerk in DC would likely reveal much the same.
I’m wondering if the FBI would even bother getting involved. Nothing I’ve seen about this fiasco would indicate that there was anything criminal involved when an internal Supreme Court document is leaked to the media.
A SC justice can be impeached. It’s happened once.
I don't, I've been here too long and I've seen all the stupid shit that stupid people throw out without one thread of evidence under the disclaimer of "speculation".......LOL!
But thanks for your disclaimer.......
In 1973, a Leak at the Supreme Court Broke News of an Imminent Ruling on Roe
Read the info at the link.
Good summary of “is it a crime” question:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/is-it-illegal-leak-us-supreme-court-opinion-2022-05-03/
It depends on the details before, during and after the fact.
I've heard some speculate that it is illegal as it is a taking of governmental property, but what do I know, I'm not a biologist.
Which pronoun does xi require?
BINGO!
Let them all go on the record stating under oath they did not leak.
Why should we assume either one acted alone? Likely they conspired to execute this plan.
Thanks, saw the details after I posted. Pretty damning to me
That is more than just a coincidence, IMHO.
Law schools
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.