Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: A leaked draft decision indicates that the Supreme Court will overturn the Roe v. Wade abortion decision
Blaze Media ^ | May 2, 2022 | Carlos Garcia

Posted on 05/02/2022 7:03:14 PM PDT by Wish2Post

A draft decision indicates that the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturn the controversial Roe v. Wade decision that established abortion rights in 1973.

The initial draft majority opinion was obtained by Politico and published on Monday. (SEE: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473)

The draft is written by Justice Samuel Alito and was reportedly circulated inside the court.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes, referring to a separate decision that defended abortion rights. The leak of a draft opinion is unprecedented in the modern history of the Supreme Court.

“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division," Alito continued.

"It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives," he adds. The draft decision is related to a challenge against the abortion decision by a Mississippi pro-life law.

“The inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions,” Alito concludes. "On the contrary, an unbroken tradition of prohibiting abortion on pain of criminal punishment persisted from the earliest days of the common law until 1973."

(Excerpt) Read more at link.theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: abbyphillip; abortion; again; andagain; andagainandagain; bidenvoters; breakingagain; cnn; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; joyreid; leakedagain; massachusetts; obamacare; overturn; plannedparenthood; politico; pollutico; righttolife; roevwade; seebreakingnews; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: FlipWilson

Not a dissent since the desert says opinion.


61 posted on 05/02/2022 8:18:44 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Draft.


62 posted on 05/02/2022 8:19:11 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

Birth is one day in the life of a person who is already nine months old.
***Oooohhh, that’s tagline worthy. I’ll update the tagline page.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3992415/posts?q=1&;page=407#407


63 posted on 05/02/2022 8:23:50 PM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

This was done with the tacit approval of one of the Supreme Court Justices, possibly Sotomayor or possibly even John Roberts (I wouldn’t put it past him). No clerk is going to fall on their sword without having an escape career and promise of a job beforehand. I smell a big black robed Justice Rat, a DemocRat.


64 posted on 05/02/2022 9:02:33 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Donald J.Trump, President in 2024 - DeSantis for VP (or Senior Advisor))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

More likely the “wise Latina”


65 posted on 05/02/2022 9:16:10 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Sotomayor or Kagan would happily leak such a decision.. in order to try to force intimidation and get it changed


66 posted on 05/02/2022 9:21:59 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Nah, it’s real. 98 pages with footnotes? All thoroughly, expertly stated? I’m sorry, but anyone capable of pulling off such a prank is likely too busy to do so, as they’re making $800/hr as a lawyer.


67 posted on 05/02/2022 10:04:02 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jerod
RBH said Roe vs. Wade was wrongly decided.
68 posted on 05/02/2022 10:25:52 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Don’t forget that the court has IT staff and many of them would be liberals. They could be the leak source. And of course there are executive branch agencies that could acess the court’s systems.


69 posted on 05/03/2022 12:46:13 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

“as they’re making $800/hr as a lawyer.”

Pocket change to the left. One wealthy liberal could pay a few hundred thousand to get something like this crafted and it would be like you or me spending a nickel.


70 posted on 05/03/2022 12:53:48 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Neither said that....and rightly so


71 posted on 05/03/2022 2:38:28 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wish2Post

It certainly looks like a proper call...laying out that before Roe....the states did have there own laws...and effectively their own precedence. Roe neglects to acknowledge the precedence of the state. The appendix showing old state laws is an important if not the most important part of this decision.


72 posted on 05/03/2022 2:42:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wish2Post

“The Devil made me do it.”

When everyone realizes how evil the democrat voters are, then America can return to a God fearing country.

They support the evil Satan led policies of evil power, abortion, out of control corrupt spending, no border control, releasing violent criminals, following the false gods of communism, controlling people and freedoms (speech, religion, guns, etc.) and total disregard for life.

Abortion is the willful killing (murder) of human beings, and all will be held accountable by God who has given us life in His image.


73 posted on 05/03/2022 4:02:11 AM PDT by ADSUM ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Looks like you were correct. Suspicion is developing around one of her clerks. Maybe a question of hinting by the justice.


74 posted on 05/03/2022 4:16:25 AM PDT by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: All

Abby Phillip at CNN (New Day show, May 3, 2022) hinted, indirectly,to Democrats to use it as fuel for the upcoming elections as a scare tactic.

75 posted on 05/03/2022 5:51:43 AM PDT by Conservat1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wish2Post

https://www.wsiltv.com/news/roberts-orders-probe-into-egregious-leak-of-abortion-draft/article_e84d295f-3fae-549d-a0f4-6d4c0f13d80e.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_WSILNews


76 posted on 05/03/2022 8:41:48 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wish2Post

Appendix shows 37 states had laws in the 1800s making abortion a crime. At some point, I believe ALL states had a law making abortion a crime.


77 posted on 05/03/2022 8:47:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wish2Post

Will this also negate Griswold?


78 posted on 05/03/2022 8:47:53 AM PDT by Clemenza (In event of a Civil War, a face diaper is a great way to spot the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wish2Post

In 1900, abortion was illegal in every state. That makes it a states rights issue. Roe vs Wade should never have gotten to the Supreme Court.


79 posted on 05/03/2022 8:51:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

No. Griswold distinguished on pp. 31-32 of draft opinion.


80 posted on 05/03/2022 8:55:34 AM PDT by wise_caucasian (VA Election 2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson