The Powerful Pfizer Presentation That Got Dr. Robert Malone Kicked Off Twitter - Pfizer's own vaccine trial data shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated.

Dr. Robert Malone says he was kicked off twitter for this 40-minute video presentation

and PDF created by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which consists of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners.

The video and PDF are a deep-dive into Pfizer’s own vaccine trial data which conclusively shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. For example, there were 20 total deaths in the vaccinated group versus 14 total deaths in the placebo group with nearly double the amount of cardiovascular deaths among the vaccinated.

Furthermore, Pfizer unblinded the trial participants, tested the Covid-19 vaccine on healthy and young individuals rather than the sick and elderly and did not track any subclinical biomarkers which would be valuable early warning signs of disease caused by the vaccines.

Pfizer reported a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that 95% actually refers to the Relative Risk Reduction, while the Absolute Risk Reduction was only 0.84%. Moreover, the Pfizer clinical results are unreliable because Pfizer introduced immense subjectivity into the trial by leaving it up to the discretion of investigators whether or not to test participants for covid-19. There were a total of 3,410 participants who had Covid-19 symptoms but were not tested for Covid-19.

Pfizer reported one of their 12-year-old trial participants who has been paralyzed to a wheelchair and forced to eat from a feeding tube for the last 10-months as “functional abdominal pain”. Another whistleblower who was a regional director of Pfizer’s clinical trials also reported to the FDA that Pfizer had falsified data, unblinded participants, and not followed up on testing participants who reported symptoms, but neither the FDA nor Pfizer ever investigated the issue.

Pfizer’s report authors had conflicts of interest with 84% of them either employed by Pfizer, owning Pfizer stock, receiving grants from Pfizer, hired as consultants by Pfizer, or previously running clinical trials for Pfizer. For example, two of the Pfizer report authors actually made $9B in stock market profit directly from the Pfizer vaccines because they also happened to be the co-founders of BioNTech.

Yet another doc returns from obscurity to become a prolific poster; https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:swingdoc/index?more=119006272

Posted in 2011 quite a bit, a few times in 2013, once in 2017 and then it’s on like donky kong starting 11/3/2020

Odd restart date considering covid had been around for almost a year.

PDF created by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which consists of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners.

Or some anonymous FReeper with ‘doc’ in their username that made a recent comeback

Who to believe?

In the Bloggers & Personal forum, on a thread titled The Powerful Pfizer Presentation That Got Dr. Robert Malone Kicked Off Twitter - Pfizer's own vaccine trial data shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated., swingdoc wrote:

There are so many things I want to post in regards to problems with this vid.
But I’ll start with RRR vs ARR.( relative risk
reduction vs absolute risk reduction)

For sure sample:
Breast cancer 1/8 women will develop currently
Say there is an drug or screening that reduces the incidence to 1/16
That is a 50% RRR
So 12.5 women get breast CA without intervention
Whereas 6.25’get breast CA witH intervention.
Significant, right?
ARR is the math of 12.5/100 vs 6.25/100 opposed to 12.5 v 6.25 (RRR)

RRR =50%
ARR =‘6.25%
So, what’s more significant to you, a RRR of 50% or an ARR of 6.25%?

Is. By doing X we can reduce your chances of breast CA by 50%
Or by doing X we cable reduce your chances of breast CA by 6.25%

Re-read and think it through:

When you apply a congatious illness as deadly as the seasonal flu, it quite obviously becomes a shell game.

There are football stadiums which separate the vaxxed and unvaxxed, wherein the 'vaccinated' were at best, less than one percent likely to spread the illness compared with the unvaccinated. The difference between the two groups is less than 1% for 2 months and continues to grow smaller every month until the 'vaccinated' are more likely to spread the illness.

The unvaccinated are fired, forced from schools, travel and into isolation because the "vaccinated" a fraction of 1 percent less contagious than the unvaccinated for 2 months or less, and then the fraction grows smaller until it's zero and then the "vaccinated" are finally more contagious than the unvaccinated.

In those work settings, wherein the unvaccinated are deemed unworthy of empoyment, they are actually healthier and able to attend work more than those who, as a result of 'vaccination' die, linger with vaccine injuries/illnesses (blindness, paralysis, stroke etc.) and some become permanently disabled.

Informed consent requires that the public understand that being 'vaccinated' does not reduce your chances of becoming ill by 95% in exchange for all the risks of the 'vaccine'. That's the lie they're being told. When breakthrough cases occurred, I watched a nurse chide people saying, "Now, no vaccine is perfect. There's still that 5% chance you could be ill. This of coures was a lie - that's the shell game right there. People traded risks to their health (most of which they were never told) in exchange for reducing their risk of Covid by 95%.

In reality, those same people would think twice before incurring all the long-term unknown risks, the strokes/clots/heart attacks/paralysis/neurological damage for around .8 of one percent reduction of their risks, which was always a fake theoretical benefit, and which is now showing to have increased their chances of illness instead of reducing it.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.