Posted on 01/02/2022 9:31:33 PM PST by bitt
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Dr. Robert Malone says he was kicked off twitter for this 40-minute video presentation
https://rumble.com/vqx3kb-the-pfizer-inoculations-do-more-harm-than-good.html
and PDF created by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, which consists of over 500 independent doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners.
The video and PDF are a deep-dive into Pfizer’s own vaccine trial data which conclusively shows an INCREASED risk of illness and death for the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. For example, there were 20 total deaths in the vaccinated group versus 14 total deaths in the placebo group with nearly double the amount of cardiovascular deaths among the vaccinated.
Furthermore, Pfizer unblinded the trial participants, tested the Covid-19 vaccine on healthy and young individuals rather than the sick and elderly and did not track any subclinical biomarkers which would be valuable early warning signs of disease caused by the vaccines.
Pfizer reported a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that 95% actually refers to the Relative Risk Reduction, while the Absolute Risk Reduction was only 0.84%. Moreover, the Pfizer clinical results are unreliable because Pfizer introduced immense subjectivity into the trial by leaving it up to the discretion of investigators whether or not to test participants for covid-19. There were a total of 3,410 participants who had Covid-19 symptoms but were not tested for Covid-19.
Pfizer reported one of their 12-year-old trial participants who has been paralyzed to a wheelchair and forced to eat from a feeding tube for the last 10-months as “functional abdominal pain”. Another whistleblower who was a regional director of Pfizer’s clinical trials also reported to the FDA that Pfizer had falsified data, unblinded participants, and not followed up on testing participants who reported symptoms, but neither the FDA nor Pfizer ever investigated the issue.
Pfizer’s report authors had conflicts of interest with 84% of them either employed by Pfizer, owning Pfizer stock, receiving grants from Pfizer, hired as consultants by Pfizer, or previously running clinical trials for Pfizer. For example, two of the Pfizer report authors actually made $9B in stock market profit directly from the Pfizer vaccines because they also happened to be the co-founders of BioNTech.
...more
Wow!
you have to adjust for age and risks-don’t believe this does, an 89 year old vaccinated has a greater risks of death than a 20 year old unvaccinated-many 20s don’t even know they have covid
now having said that pfizer, and fucci are definitely profiting
Ping
They had more deaths from the jabbed side after they unblinded it and some switched from Team Placebo.
Data? Here's some official data viewed through simple arithmetic, official Covid deaths as a percentage of the population.
As of 2 January 2022:
For the world:
( 5,440,715 “global deaths over two years) / 7,917,528,778 global population ) x 100 = 0.0687%
Less than seven one-hunredths of one percent “global deaths” from Covid over two years.
For the US....
( 825,819 “U.S. Deaths” over two years / 331,002,651 U.S. population ) x 100 = 0.249%
About 25 one-hunredths of one percent, given the rule of thumb that about one percent of a population dies off each year.
I’m still looking for a reasoned answer as to why Trump is advising us all to get vaccinated despite the evidence that they may be harmful or even dangerous.
CLAIM: Because 14 people in Pfizer’s placebo group died and 15 people in the vaccinated group also died, Pfizer’s data shows its COVID-19 vaccine does not reduce the risk of dying from the disease.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Those figures reflect deaths from all causes during Pfizer’s ongoing study of its vaccine. Pfizer’s data shows that the vaccine is highly effective at preventing serious illness. Data from countries that have used the vaccine widely shows it is also effective at preventing death from COVID-19.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-964291665925
AP = roflmao thanks
I've thought it through...we're not talking about some
hypothetical cancer disease so your comparison, IMO, is mute.
Say there is an drug or screening that reduces the incidence to 1/16
At least you didn't claim there was a vaccine.
Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines?
It is striking that all COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, presently approved by regulatory authorities, are administered by intramuscular injections. These IM injected COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 virus are predominantly designed to produce an IgG and cell mediated responses, preventing viremia and the COVID-19 syndrome. They have been shown to have a high degree of efficacy in humans (70–95%). However, as preclinical studies and as a recent clinical study have shown, they generally provide little protection against viral replication and shedding in the upper airways (38%–49% less likelyhood of passing on the virus compared to unvaccinated people), since such protection requires the presence of a local sIgA immune response."
Continued spread is not a bug, in other words, it's a feature.
What State is that? Your profile doesn't say.
What kind of doctor are you?
...I have not seen this.
Can you state unequivocally that it hasn't happened elsewhere?
That seems a significant thing to know.
Amd conveniently incomplete (see above).
Which would affect both the vaccinated and placebo group, Making the difference still significant as an indicator,amirite? And which means that AP, and you, are full of booshito, Captain Save-a-Vax.
#FormerlyKnownAsMojo
No wonder Deep State likes vaxx mandate.
Folks, looks like the best thing you can do to keep the public safe is REFUSE to get vaxxed.
TigersEye wrote: “All for a disease with an overall survival rate of 99.35%”
Did you get the polio vaccine?”
How about the measles vaccine?
The survival rate for both was about the same as the value for COVID.
You mean a virus.
The average corona virus life span is 4 months. They mutate and burn out.
So why is the CDC/NIC still pushing jabs for a virus that is long gone?
Probably the same reason why we are not talking talking about natural immunity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.