Posted on 04/27/2021 8:55:27 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Remember when the Republicans tried to halt the audit of the Election 2000 Florida ballots that was conducted by a consortium of liberal news organizations in 2001? No? That's because it NEVER happened. Oh, there was such an audit but the Republicans did NOT object to it at all. Contrast that attitude to now when the Democrats and their media allies are desperately trying to stop the audit of the Maricopa County ballots by portraying it as "dangerous" as you can see in this compilation of news clips.
PING!
Wait ll they find out Trump never loses.
Don't forget, for liberals, history began this morning...
Of course the Media thinks it is “dangerous”. It threatens leftist power over elections.
There is only one way in which an audit could be construed as ‘dangerous’. That is if it actual exposes fraud. If the audit validates the media narrative, all is well.
Just curious...
There was an AP article in our local (liberal) newspaper last night, about this Maricopa audit. Even I was appalled at how slanted it was. (can’t locate it right now)
Democrat Logic.....
Knife fights - Not dangerous
Looking at paper = Dangerous!
... hasn't been to the border is because she has no authority to be an emissary of the USA ... she is not the veep, because sleepy jobama is not POTUS.
No, camel toe is headed to Venezuela to establish residency because her sick brain thinks she's gonn'a be assassinated after we take back the White House and set America right.
Beginning with the dupes that willingly allowed this coup to occur
Can you explain why they say it’s dangerous?
I have been wondering the same thing. I spent a good 15 minutes this morning watching the feed. It seems all the tables are doing the same thing, as if the division between them is simply red, green, blue and yellow teams. You will note that off to side of each of the color teams they are inspecting ballots in a box, with a UV flashlight. Each color team has the same setup. It has been mentioned that the UV flashlight is being used to detect watermarks on ballots. Whether that is the case or not is pure speculation.
I observed that not all ballots pass under the UV flashlight. Does that mean that a watermark is clearly seen in normal light? I don't know. I did notice, that all ballots after going through this inspection are placed into one box. It does not look like they are separating ballots into different boxes.
The other tables have a turntable where it appears they are counting the votes. One person places the ballot on the turntable, then three people record the vote. Lastly, another person pulls the ballot off the turntable. This is not consistent at all tables. It appears some tables have the same person placing and removing the ballot from the turntable. Doesn't seem to be a problem in my estimation.
I haven't been able to determine flow of the ballots between tables. I am not sure if the ballots go from the UV table to the counting tables, or the other way around. I am not sure if ballots move between color coded teams, e.g., red to blue to ...
It will be interesting to see if things change over the next few weeks. Supposedly they are going to be inspecting mail-in ballot envelopes. I have not seen any of that yet.
They are afraid that things will be found. Maybe they will. Or maybe they have it cleaned up or this was a county that’s a set up and was counted correctly. That way if the fraud accusations got to bad then they had a county that was counted correctly to make us look like crazy conspiracy theorists...
Dangerous = Exposes the truth.
The media seems to have forgotten the YUUUUUUGE audit of the Florida ballots by a consortium of news organizations in 2001, months after the 2000 election
Come on that was then, this is now. Since the dems (and by extension the Press) don’t recognize we actually have a constitution, not a list of suggestions, why should what happened long long ago in a place far far way matter!
Thank you for that.
They have to sequester their functions from each other, and make sure that there’s no cross contamination from one audit team to another.
Don’t the DemoNazis say that they want fair elections? Or are they now abandoning that stance in favor of “we counted and we say we won, no recounts”?
Even if they are able to prove all the tactics that were used to steal to election, how can it be used to change the vote when; there is a new Judge in charge that has a history of Democrat bed fellows and was appointed by Janet Rhino?
They have all their talking points:
1. “Six months after the election”
2. “Being done using secret procedures.”
What an echo chamber.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.