Posted on 12/21/2020 9:55:23 AM PST by PROCON
For the fun factor. Why do you ask?
[[[Its the guns I’ve sold i miss the most.]]]
There is a song in there some place.
Range, accuracy, and lethality. The M-1 Garand was the apotheosis of infantry rifle. In many ways it was superior to the M-16. The Army Infantry Department did a survey after World War II and found that only 25% of infantrymen engaged in a firefight fired their weapons. They figured it would just draw fire on themselves. BAR men fired about 90% of the time. The psychological effect of automatic fire encouraged men to fire. (Also, the BAR would be used for covering fire when closing with the enemy.)
This was the thinking behind the M-16. It is an easy weapon to fire, with little recoil, and good accuracy and lethality. It also provides a high volume of fire, which is necessary for suppression fire.
My grandad says the Japs found out real quick how effective the M1 carbine was - the Marines favored it over the M1 Garand.
Too bad you couldn’t have saved some hamburgers either.
Funny how the same people who call the Carbine a weak weapon say quite different things about an even weaker .357 Magnum. Paul Harrell has a good video on the Carbine’s ammo performance and the false info about it on you tube.
The carbine was never intended as a main battle rifle. Simply an improvement over the .45 pistol, which was basically useless outside of a room or a trench. My only complaint is that reloaded ammo can be troublesome. It’s really best to only use factory ammo.
There were times when US troops would expend 600 rounds per day through a Garand in WW2. My shoulder hurts just thinking of it.
One plus to the Garand is that you can just put new clips in it, 8 rounds at a time, as long as you want without having to stop to charge magazines.
I agree. Yet I always wondered why they never developed a bottle shaped round similar to the 7.62x39 for the Carbine in 7.62x33.
A carbine was originally a shorter, lighter version of an infantry rifle originally used by cavalry or dragoons. For example, the Germans developed the KAR-98 which was about foot shorter than a Gewehr 98. Later it became standard issue for all troops.
Nowadays, a carbine seems to be a rifle shooting a pistol cartridge.
The M-1 Carbine is more like an assault rifle, a lighter weapon shooting an intermediate cartridge. However, since it lacks selective fire (and a ‘scary looking’ stock) it is not an assault rifle. The M-2 Carbine has selective fire and might be considered an assault rifle, but again, it lacks the fancy stock - unless you get the paratrooper version!
There are pistols chambered for .30 carbine, notably a Ruger Blackhawk.
Why not? I love my 30 carbine Ruger Blackhawk revolver, and I'd love to have one of the old AMT Automag III semi auto .30 carbine pistols. They are 100+ yard handguns.
Some people DO complain that they are too loud, but that doesn't bother me, and my reloads are much quieter than factory mil spec ammo, with the same performance.
“The confusion between the two weapons..”
Who the hell has ever been confused between the two?
Because you want to be able to put their d**ks in the dirt and not have them get up.
General George Patton said the M 1 Garand was ‘’The finest battle implement ever made’’. I fired one once. Good God what a cannon! And what a kick. Even with a padded shooting jacket my right shoulder hurt for two days.
___________________________________________________________
I am well acquainted with both the German Mauser and the M1 Garand and much prefer the Garand. The Mauser is lighter and has a tremendous kick but the Garand while heavier has a lighter punch and being semi auto you can put 8 rounds downrange in a tight grouping because you never lose the sight picture. I could fire the Garand all day long, loved it.
I has a kick, but so does the .357 magnum
8mm Mauser will set you on your ass.
Malcolm has the Nation of Islam literally gunning for him constantly until they finally got their hit. FBI-informant Calypso Louie was likely involved.
Bugsy Siegle was shot through the eye with an M1-Carbine while he was sitting on his couch reading the Los Angeles Times.
bttt
I think the idea now is it is better to wound someone than kill them. There are more bullets per pound with a smaller round. The wounded put more drain on both immediate and future resources. That is also true today. Think about disability and healthcare benefits.
An M1 Carbine story: Back in the 1980s my parents
traveled from NorCal to Anaheim to attend an 11th
Airborne Div Association reunion. My dad was an
original 11th AB “Angel”. My sister lived in Burbank
at the time and visited my folks at the reunion hotel.
Sis and mom were enjoying a conversation with other
wives in the lobby when a message came over the PA
system regarding the purchase of raffle tickets. The
prize was a commemorative M1 carbine manufactured by
Iver Johnson which, BTW, had NOT produced that model
for WWII. Anyway, my mom and the other wives found
humor in the prospect that one of the elderly
paratrooper “boys” could be lurking around the hotel
with a WWII firearm. As it turned out the winner of
the carbine was my dad. The joke was on my mom.
I inherited the gold trimmed carbine from my dad
and it still has never been fired.
Define carbine please.
___________________________________________________________
The M1 Carbine fired a bullet type round with a blunt nose.
The firearm itself resembles its big brother in that it also uses a rotating bolt. It is magazine fed from a separate clip which inserts underneath. Back to the bullet, it is smaller then the Garand’s 30.06 round with much less propellant. The range I believe is about 200 yards while the Garand is at least 5 times that. The carbine fit a niche between 45 pistols and the Garand was cheap and easy to use with easy reloads. You could say it was a plinker. I am also well acquainted with it and the closest modern firearm would be the mini-14 but again a bullet round not the .223.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.