Posted on 12/16/2020 7:12:37 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Sidney Powell's "Kraken" has finally made it to the docket of the Supreme Court. The suit is perhaps the strongest collective argument yet against voter fraud.
It contains the forensic audit done in Michigan that proves systemic voter fraud occurred through the Dominion Voting System tabulation. It also has proof of at least 200,000 FRAUDULANT VOTES casted in the election.
Further, it contains official Georgia elections records that prove the Dominion Voting Systems program's "inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results." In other words, official Georgia election canvassers could not rely on Dominion Voting Systems' software to count the vote because it didn't repeat the same vote totals twice.
The Lawsuit states:
15. The Interim Report shows multiple grave problems with the accuracy and vulnerability to hacking and evidence destruction of the Dominion Voting Systems (“Dominion”) machines used in Antrim County, Michigan. The report is relevant to each of the Related Cases because each of the states in question uses Dominion equipment. The Interim Report vindicates the lengthy opinion and order of Judge Amy Totenberg in Curling v. Raffensperger, 2020 WL 5994029 (N.D. Ga. 10/11/20), which found “extreme” and unacceptable security risks in the Dominion system. Compelling evidence and expert analyses show convincingly that the results of the Dominion system cannot be trusted and should not have been certified.
16. The findings in the Interim Report are consistent with the expert testimony provided by Mr. Ramsland regarding Dominion’s vote manipulation in the Petitioners’ November 25, 2020 complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the “District Court”) (R 450; 2438), and with his testimony in the Related Cases. Mr. Ramsland concluded in the Georgia case that, for the State of Georgia, “at least 96,000 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,” and “136,098 ballots were illegally counted as result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,” id., each of which is several times larger than former VicePresident [sic] Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia (10,457 votes). Similar anomalies exist in the Related Cases. Among other things, the Complaints in the trial courts and the Petitions to this Court in each of the Related Cases all seek prospective injunctive relief requiring a similar forensic audit of Dominion voting machines.
17. The Coffee County, Georgia Board of Registration and Elections refused to certify the machine recount election returns on their Dominion systems “given its inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.”6 The results of the machine recount report were internally inconsistent and could not be reconciled and were inconsistent with both the election night count and the hand audit.7 The Coffee County BRE analysis confirms the findings of the Interim Report, cited above, that ballots going to adjudication can be changed on a wholesale basis by the operator with no oversight, controls or accountability, an extremely serious vulnerability.
The Kraken has been released, and it's time to audit the vote and cancel out the widespread fraud that tipped the election for Biden.
Attorney representing the Electors and they have standing
See post 16.
I don’t recommend clicking on the link. Bad website.
Sidney is the attorney.
Timothy King, et al., Petitioners are the plaintiffs with standing.
LOL!
Is this the RICO suit?
Kraken = People on Krak.
Georgia is doing another signature verification count and vote watchers have their “telescopes” trained on the counters.
That’s not how this works. Sidney is the attorney, not the plaintiff. The issue is whether her client(s), the plaintiffs, have standing.
They respondcto public pressure. Time we applied some.
No hearing in 3,... 2,...
Maybe they heard the huge blowback from denying the Texas case.
“Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)”
By January 14th, Congress will already have met on January 6th to confirm the election, and the suit will be moot.
There’s lots of frustration here, and procedural rejections are valid concerns. Standing is not a simple issue, and with creative dance moves, the Court could find it lacking here although, if I’m not mistaken, this case is an appeal of a lower court decision, so the issue is not standing but whether the Court finds the case to be moot or just decides not to hear it without giving a reason.
Our esteemed SCOTUS hung a sign on it’s front door for all to see, it reads:
If you’ve come here for justice you’ve come to the wrong place.
If we had 5 Thomas’ things would be different but we currently only have one.
Wow. Too bad SCOTUS is going to be busy with deciding whether college football players should be compensated. That is much more important than a bunch of conservative voters being disenfranchised by cheating Democrats.
She’s not the plaintiff electors are. Personally if the Supremes refuse this case and Rudys PA case I don’t know what more can be done.
I don't think it matters. Our institutions simply do not care if they are overthrown. There is already enough evidence if anyone wanted to actually do anything about it. They don't want to do anything and are now looking for excuses to ignore it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.