Read More...
Posted on 11/12/2020 5:42:04 AM PST by wrrock
‘The Big Short,’ prodigy Michael Burry MD points out the 2020 elections are full of statistical anomalies. He recommends users watch the video posted by Dr. Shiva, MIT PhD, and decide for yourself about the 2020 Elections.
(Excerpt) Read more at toptradeguru.com ...
53% approval...73M votes
Saw it. Highly recommend. Clear algorithms at work that showed he more Republican a precinct was, the more that Republicans switched their vote to Biden. Deep, straight linear curves that made no sense and were not random.
It will likely be removed soon.
A bump to say great post, shared the link twice already, thanks!
It is hard to prove things statistically.
Have to look for mismatches, such as 640000 mail-in votes and 630000 mail-in envelopes.
I don't need to see anymore videos with graphs. I just want a fair and honest election where the results are hand-counted and tabulated at the precinct level like in the old days without all this computer technology. Somehow, before computers, we were able to know who the new president was the very next day!
Now I'm going to throw something out there that you might think totally crazy. Why the need for secret ballots? Every voter should sign their own ballot before turning it in. That would be a way to add some accountability to all of this.
The bad news is most reporters can’t do math or even understand it...
For those who struggle to understand the significance of this graph, the premise is actually pretty simple. To get enough Biden votes, they could not simply manufacture them from the Democrat precincts. Not only would it be very obvious, it would be the first place people look. But if their software were rigged to take Trump votes from highly Republican counties/precincts, it would just look as if there wasn’t as much enthusiasm as thought with Republicans. However, the problem is that if this were the case, one would think that the enthusiasm would be the same among all Republicans throughout the state. An 85% support of Republicans in one county should be about 85% support in another county, give or take a few percentage points. In other words, there should not be a downward slope or curve, but rather a constant horizontal line. However, that’s not what we see here. We see a downward slope indicating the more heavy Republican a precinct is, the less enthusiasm they had for Trump. This is counter-intuitive and indicates votes were siphoned off from Trump to Biden in a methodical/algorrythmic way (IE: software).
The one thing I think the good Dr. needs to discuss is why he posits vote shifting on non-party-line but not on party-line ballots. I think his graphs would be different, but I'm not sure what that difference would be if the party-line ballots were also shifted.
ML/NJ
No because party-line votes are a type of predictable control.
10 minutes in and I’m wondering if their assumptions are faulty.
All they might have found is that
in both presumed dem or repub precincts,’a la carte, or maverick voters tend to vote contrarily.
You need to watch the whole video. The “I guess Republicans hate Trump” is Mitt Romney’s idea, which is shown to be impossible.
The X coordinate is the party-line vote. The Y coordinate is the delta between the party-line and non-party votes of the same party. What is being pointed out is that the polling locations should should have a relatively linear distribution along the Y axis. It appears to have an algorithm that has a trigger point along the X axis to increase the delta in votes for Biden at the expense of Trump in another linear line. The change in vote is not random but methodical.
The difference between the two percentages tends to be the same across all precincts. If candidate enthusiasm is high, there will be a higher percentage type 2 ballots with Trump. If enthusiasm is low, then the type 2 Biden percentage will increase. Again this difference tends to be the same across all precincts in an honest election and will produce a clear left to right straight line.
The declining slope is clear evidence of fraud. It actually shows that the higher the percentage of straight party ballots went R, the more individual selection ballots went Biden. THIS MAKES NO SENSE AND IS FRAUD. We know the opposite occurred. Very few R voters would vote Biden, while many D voters would pick Trump.
Working with large data sets like many precincts will reveal fraud more easily than individual votes. The courts need to understand this.
Why the need for secret ballots?
As an originalist, a few years ago I looked into what was the voting norm of the Founders in this context. To my surprise, back then there was no secret ballot. For most of America’s history, from colonial days to the 1890s, keeping the content of your vote secret was almost impossible. There was no expectation that the vote should be secret and little understanding of how this could be accomplished even if it were a good idea. Many people – and not just political operatives – thought secrecy was not a good idea...All elections for most of America’s history were organized to be non-secret. They were public events with individual voting occurring in plain sight of the crowds that election days once attracted. They were the culmination of weeks of excited electioneering. In large cities, they were public spectacles, with torchlight parades and the large scale public “illuminations,”
Now, I am not saying this is a GOOD idea. But as we ponder how we got here, and look to the Constitution for guidance, it's important to recall just what's was the voting norm back in the day.
Parenthetically, a statistician etc should be able to explain their research to a non-practitioner in 30 seconds. For example, this "surge" in cases isn't due to bad social distancing or careless unmasked youths or whatever.....we are seeing a SEASONAL RISE in cases and fatalities, and not a "surge."
The majority of deaths in most countries can be attributed to causes that feature a distinct seasonal pattern. The figure depicts the relative monthly frequencies of nine selected causes of death in the United States for women and men combined for the years 1959–2014. The reported number of counts in parentheses in the title of each panel is the actual number of deaths.
Viruses gonna virus.
The more I think of it (secret ballots), the more I am convinced that this method of voting is much more conducive to fraud than if you signed your name (and address/cell number) to your ballot. Hell, I would even be willing to put my social security number on it if it helps to make my ballot unique (and my own). Heck, we put our SSN on pretty much everything else such as driver's licenses, loan applications, etc. So why not use it for probably the most important civic function we perform?
I believe this would make it much more difficult to perpetrate election fraud. Every citizen would be tied to their own ballot and the local newspaper could print the results by name so that every citizen could ensure that their vote was properly counted. We would have potentially thousands of citizens in each precinct double-checking the tallies and making sure they add up properly. This pretty much takes the secret "flipping" of votes by computer virtually impossible. Also, if somebody's dead grandmother showed up in the paper as voting, that would quickly be spotted!
I guess some people would object to having their name published along with who they voted for. I never had that concern. I'm always proud of my vote and have no problem having it duly published - if it assists in having an honest and fair election result.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.