Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/09/2020 2:51:14 PM PDT by EyesOfTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EyesOfTX

It’s not an option for the judge....but any one of the initial judges can call for it.


2 posted on 07/09/2020 2:54:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

What is amazing to myself is the depth of which these bastards will go to cover up their crimes. Or in this case, the uncovering of their crimes.

And they will all go down to the gallows as one and hang together.


4 posted on 07/09/2020 2:56:59 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Does Sullivan think he can drag this out 4 months???


5 posted on 07/09/2020 3:02:05 PM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Wonder if Flynn can sue the court for malicious prosecution?


6 posted on 07/09/2020 3:02:34 PM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

This judge can afford his own attorney


7 posted on 07/09/2020 3:04:19 PM PDT by vigilante2 (Make liberals cry again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

L8tr


9 posted on 07/09/2020 3:09:39 PM PDT by NEPA (Repeal the 17th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

I’m surprised the judge did it himself. I’d think the prosecutor he appointed would more likely do it. I guess even he saw the futility of that.


10 posted on 07/09/2020 3:17:06 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

The black robes learn to be gods in their three years of law school.


12 posted on 07/09/2020 3:25:49 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

This Court has 4 Obama appointees, 3 Clinton appointees, 1 by GW Bush and 3 by Trump.


14 posted on 07/09/2020 3:33:25 PM PDT by Montaignes Cat (HER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

It is hard to overstate how wildly inappropriate this is. Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a trial court judge is not even allowed to respond to a petition for mandamus unless invited to do so by the court of appeals. Why on earth does he think he is allowed to request en banc review?


16 posted on 07/09/2020 4:05:33 PM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

I agree. It is a circus and it definitely is not Flynn’s fault.


18 posted on 07/09/2020 4:21:19 PM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Federal Judges can be impeached. This one should be.


23 posted on 07/09/2020 4:57:49 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Sullivan is not a party to the case. Therefore, he has no standing to ask for an en banc review, nor to appeal to SCOTUS.


27 posted on 07/09/2020 10:26:05 PM PDT by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

The correct response by the appeals court is that neither the judge’s lawyer nor the judge have any standing.


28 posted on 07/10/2020 3:33:44 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson