Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did John Roberts Set up an Offshore Bank Account in Malta right after his Obamacare Ruling? You decide...
Voat ^ | OregonAngel2

Posted on 06/18/2020 9:26:35 AM PDT by Oregon Valkyrie

At least four times now Justice John Roberts has betrayed the conservatives. Further he has twisted the law and written decisions that were legal contortions inconsistent with his legal ability and history.

What has been going on? What could have motivated him to betray his country and his legal integrity like that?

It has been suggested that Roberts is secretly homosexual, and he did pro-bono work for gay activists back in 1996, but the stigma attached to that has effectively been removed by societal changes over the decades. He appears to be happily married in the normal sense.

It has been suggested that his children’ adoptions were illegal and thus he feared that they could be taken away from him. Yet his children are now adult age. They have outgrown any risk of removal.

Just a few months ago Chief Justice Roberts ruled that the Trump administration could not place the citizenship question on the 2020 Census. This defies the supermajority desires of both political parties, and clearly violates the Constitution and precedent. It is also an affront to common sense.

Furthermore, the history of John Roberts demonstrates a very sharp legal mind. He should not have authored something that is such poor legal reasoning. It is an affront to his integrity and his self respect as an American and as a lawyer.

Why is Roberts still backing legal decisions that are both a betrayal and such a legal embarrassment? What information could bad actors have on him that could explain his betrayal.

Let’s look more carefully at his actions and timing:

Immediately following his disastrous Obamacare decision where he upheld the Individual Mandate, he went to the island of Malta. He flew to Malta on the Fourth of July 2012. He left his wife and children behind, and went to the island for two weeks, where he gave a few lectures on “The Supreme Court in Historical Perspective”.

"The course taught by the Supreme Court's Chief Justice is for only one credit and meets six times with a take home exam. "The Supreme Court In Historical Perspective" examines "how the role and operation of the Supreme Court have changed since the nation’s founding, with particular emphasis on the role of the Chief Justice.”

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/andrewkaczynski/john-roberts-malta-class-the-supreme-court-in-hi

Roberts referred to Malta as his “impregnable island fortress”. It has a rich history. It was where HW Bush met with Gorbachev on ships in the harbor, and it is where the Catholic Knights of Malta are headquartered.

There is no public information on how much he was paid for these lectures or who was present, but as the Clintons example showed, lectures in foreign countries can result in very large fees. According to one source the later President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy of Belgium was present on Malta at the same time.

http://www.texemarrs.com/072012/roberts_lauded_by_knights_of_malta.htm

The interesting thing about Malta is that it is a major offshore banking location. It is one of the top ten locations for offshore banking. Banking arrangements for non EU individuals takes about two weeks - the length of time Judge Roberts visited. Even though he only gave 6 lectures, he stayed long enough to set up an account.

Furthermore, it is possible to incorporate a company in Malta and set it up so that it is not public who actually owns the company:

"The ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) of a company need not be on public record. Company formation can usually be completed in a few days for EU nationals. It will take a bit longer (a couple of weeks) for other nationalities.”

https://internationalman.com/articles/offshore-jurisdiction-review-malta/https://matadornetwork.com/life/ten-best-countries-to-set-up-an-offshore-account/

It would have been possible for Judge Roberts to have set up a private corporate account which could have received funds without anyone publicly knowing it existed. It is at least possible that there was some sort of covert payoff there during those two weeks.

As Forbes notes:"The Obamacare Supreme Court ruling seemed strange. Chief Justice John Roberts’ reasoning was incoherent. The conservative’s dissent read like it was originally meant to be a majority opinion. Now, we know why. According to Jan Crawford of CBS News, John Roberts switched sides in May, withstanding a “one-month campaign” from his conservative colleagues to change his mind.

“I am told by two sources with specific knowledge of the court's deliberations that Roberts initially sided with the conservatives in this case and was prepared to strike down...the individual mandate,” said Crawfordon CBS’ Face the Nation. “But Roberts, I’m told by my sources, changed his views, deciding to instead join with the liberals.”"

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2012/07/01/the-supreme-courts-john-roberts-changed-his-obamacare-vote-in-may/#191758b2d701

Was Judge Roberts waiting for a sufficiently high offer and threatening to side with the conservatives?

Consider that if the account was set up in Malta at that time, it has been possible to put money into it covertly ever since then.

The second oldest bank in Malta is HSBC. https://www.hsbc.com.mt.

HSBC has been deeply entwined with payoffs to the Clinton Foundation including accounts for Jeffrey Epstein (the convicted pedophile of Sex Slave island fame) and Denise Rich (of the infamous Clinton pardon fame).

"The charitable foundation run by Hillary Clinton and her family has received as much as $81m from wealthy international donors who were clients of HSBC’s controversial Swiss bank.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/10/hillary-clinton-foundation-donors-hsbc-swiss-bank

James Comey, the disgraced fixer for the Clintons, is on the Board of Directors of HSBC. List of directors and their role and function.

HSBC has also been deeply involved in drug money laundering as well as handling money for adversary nations under sanctions, and the Obama DOJ intentionally refused to prosecute:

"The US government decided not to pursue criminal charges against HSBC for allowing terrorists and drug dealers to launder millions of dollars after George Osborne and the UK banking regulator intervened to warn that prosecuting Britain’s biggest bank could lead to a “global financial disaster”.

“Rather than lacking adequate evidence to prove HSBC’s criminal conduct, internal treasury documents show that DoJ leadership declined to pursue [its legal team’s] recommendation to prosecute HSBC because senior DoJ leaders were concerned that prosecuting the bank ‘could result in a global financial disaster’– as the FSA repeatedly warned.”

The 2012 settlement detailed how Mexico’s Sinaloa drug cartel and Colombia’s Norte del Valle cartel laundered $881m through HSBC and a Mexican unit. In some cases, Mexican branches had widened tellers’ windows to allow big boxes of cash to be pushed across the counters.

HSBC also violated US sanctions by working with customers in Iran, Libya, Sudan, Burma and Cuba."

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/11/hsbc-us-money-laundering-george-osborne-report

While the above is worthy of suspicion and further investigation by the authorities, It is also possible that there is something even more damaging that could have been affecting Roberts’ decision that took place much earlier. That has to do with the secretive and unusual circumstances of how he adopted his children.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2024election; anthonyfauci; clintonimpropriety; comeyimpropriety; corruption; covidstooges; election2016; election2024; johnroberts; justiceroberts; learnhowtopost; malta; obamacare; offshorebankacct; offshorebanking; presidenttrump; roberts; robertsimpropriety; scotus; scotusimpropriety; vaccinemandates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: rodguy911

Roberts and his wife Jane Roberts are parents to two children, John “Jack” Roberts and Josephine “Josie” Roberts. Roberts and his wife chose to adopt both children, who were just toddlers when their father joined the Supreme Court. Today, they are both 16 years old.Jan 28, 2020


61 posted on 06/22/2020 4:00:59 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

That’s right now tell me the history of how they were adopted please!


62 posted on 06/22/2020 4:01:59 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic home of free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Oregon Valkyrie

to “control” Washington DC all you need are the appropriate files on about a 1000 people. Hillary stole 900 FBI files in 1997. The Clinton Foundation has kept them current.

Silver or Lead. Or pix with women other than your wife, or with children or with boyz.

Its totally infested.


63 posted on 06/22/2020 4:04:02 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
"Evidently Roberts arranged for this adoption through some sort of trafficking agency, that contacted Irish women, arranged for them to be transported out of Ireland and into compliant Latin American countries, from which they were adopted, thereby circumventing Irish laws — entirely illegal, but perhaps quasi-legitimized by the birth mothers, two in this case, transporting the children out of Ireland.

Undoubtedly Roberts and his wife spent a great deal of money for this illegal process, circumventing Irish laws and arranging for the transit of two Irish children from separate birth-mothers to a foreign nation. As of 2012, those two children have been with the Roberts’ for roughly 10 years, since they were adopted as “infants”.”"

Evidently.

Perhaps.

Undoubtedly.

And ultimately, NOTHING but speculation.

Please, someone let Mollie Hemingway or John Solomon know of this. Scoop of the century. They will win a Pulitizer for breaking wide open this story. His children probably can't be deported now anyways (if this it true), so what's to lose?

64 posted on 06/22/2020 4:11:04 AM PDT by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mo
The Clinton Foundation has kept them current

More speculation.

FACTS.

People seem to be going out of their way to explain away how CJ Roberts can vote the way he does (not in one with what you want).

How about that he is a squish for a jurist? It can't be just that?

65 posted on 06/22/2020 4:15:09 AM PDT by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fury
Sorry but after researching this for five years,and don't ask for links most of them have been blacked out,IMHO, it's a hell of a lot more than speculation. Story starts with Roberts and his wife being unable to have children so they decide to adopt,in the vicinity of 2003,or 2004, whatever.

The mother-in-law interjects and states: 'wouldn't it be nice to have a blonde haired boy and girl from the home county'. I'm not sure if it was county Cork in Ireland or not. So through one way or another they found two birth mothers. I was never able to get any info on who,what agency, they used or how they got the names of the birth mothers.

They took the birth mothers to Central America with the children and adopted them from Central America to the US (I don't know the country never found any info on it)as if they were born in Central America.Patently illegal in so many ways.

Bush 43 selected Roberts as a Justice in July of 2005.The NYT did a standard bio which is hard to find now but wasn't several years ago. So if you don't believe me I really don't care. Anyway they did the standard bio and discovered what had happened to the kids but failed to go into any detail since the NYT is a gutless wonder of a paper anyway.

Little seemed to get in the way of the illegal adoption until Obamcare came before the Supreme Court and as head Justice Roberts wrote his brief. Initially it was against Obamcare. Once again if you can't find links I don't care. I know what I did and what I found.

My guess and it's only speculation but does make sense is that the obama/cia clowns running the administration at the time got desperate and started looking for anything they could find on Roberts to compromise him. (an old Clinton trick)I have no links on this it's all speculation.I also guessed that they may have used the HAMMR a high tech computer initially used to track terrorists to find anything they could on Roberts.I think they found the NYT article which would not have been too hard to find at the time. It would not have been too difficult to put the rest together, present it to Roberts, and own him ever since.

Justice Scalia spent a month grilling the shit out of Roberts as to why he changed his brief from against obamacare to "it's a tax." One of his pathetic reasons that came out later was that he was doing everyone a favor since an EO by a Republican President could have gotten rid of a tax,but that failed to get anyone's attention.

IMHO, Scalia was killed in part because he knew too much about why Roberts changed his mind on zero care.Once again I can't prove it other than Scalia is dead.

If you take a close look at Roberts' votes since obamacare you will find he sides with the hard left on key issues and is given a pass on the rest. Daca being the latest one.But there are others I just don't have the time to look them up. If you don't like what you just read do your own research,as for me I did mine.

66 posted on 06/22/2020 4:48:16 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic home of free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911; null and void; aragorn; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; Black Agnes; blueyon; ...
.

PING

Check out # 66.

Linked:

Chief Justice Roberts Unusual Adoptions Investigated

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3856843/posts

67 posted on 06/22/2020 5:48:44 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

ALSO.

See # 58 on this thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3856844/posts?page=58#58


68 posted on 06/22/2020 5:55:44 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Thanks for the research.

There are plenty of conservative journalists that could have blown this wide open years ago. Why haven’t they? Why wouldn’t they? Are they all in some way compromised? No.

We’ll never agree on the conclusions you draw. But the efforts to do the research are appreciated.

I believe that CJ Roberts is just a squish for a jurist.


69 posted on 06/22/2020 6:14:14 AM PDT by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Someone recently posted the Lolita Express flight log, with Roberts name on it.

Pleas get this over to Mollie Hemingway, or John Solomon, or Byron York. Blockbuster of the year.

70 posted on 06/22/2020 6:15:41 AM PDT by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

True.


71 posted on 06/22/2020 6:48:56 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one Check of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

Of course. It’s a homo org so that generally covers a lot.


72 posted on 06/22/2020 6:50:45 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one Check of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; All

Anything Lucy does you can take to the bank everytime.


73 posted on 06/22/2020 6:56:00 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic home of free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; rodguy911; All
Saw these related tweets...

As @LLinWood just tweeted, its high time the American people find out if Justice John Roberts is the same person who flew on the Jeffrey Epstein "Lolita express" listed on the flight logs under the name John Roberts— Steve o/b/o Patrick 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@rhainman) June 18, 2020

Get the answer. America is entitled to know the truth one way or the other. John Roberts holds the most powerful government position in the nation. Was he the “John Roberts” on the Epstein flight logs? Simple Q and A. Yes or no? @realDonaldTrump @TheJusticeDept @SenTomCotton https://t.co/3HBhYw6giX— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) June 18, 2020

Something is up with Chief Justice John Roberts. It is time to learn whether the Chief Justice is the “John Roberts” whose name appears on flight itineraries on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet. This country is entitled to know the TRUTH the whole TRUTH, & nothing but the TRUTH. https://t.co/rG1TNzAXOj— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) June 18, 2020

Yesterday, I posed question about whether Chief Justice John Roberts flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet. Today, I pose some additional questions, this time directed to @BillGates & @BillClinton. America has afforded them wealth & power. Country is entitled to honest answers.— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) June 19, 2020

Well, someone named "John Roberts" did. Is it our Chief Justice? --> “Covington Boys” Lawyer Floats Theory: Justice Roberts is “Compromised” Because He Flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” https://t.co/DFCpzpN9lv via @WayneDupreeShow— Diana West (@diana_west_) June 20, 2020

For some reason, I can't get Twitter pics/images to post, for past couple of days....can anyone get this image posted? It's from above Diana West tweet....

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1273776171826606080/Yic9ot9e?format=jpg&name=medium

74 posted on 06/22/2020 7:24:30 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Yes, to all you posted. It was beyond stupid for Roberts to do this. He could have adopted those kids or any kids legally. Sure, there’d be more paperwork but a lot easier on his bank account.

Fast forward to 2020. This adoption mess is way past the statute of limitations. The kids are now adults so can’t be sent back to whatever country. That Roberts isn’t standing up to his supposed conservative roots is proof he never was truly conservative. Once a snake in the grass, always a snake snake in the grass. Enough of trying to make him conservative. Put him in league with Kagan and Sotomayor and be done with it.


75 posted on 06/22/2020 7:32:05 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Oregon Valkyrie

Back before the big internet cleanse, there was an article listing obamy and others with off shore accounts.


76 posted on 06/22/2020 7:35:18 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury
If I had the time and money to first go to Ireland than tour Central and now it looks like South America to follow up on every lead there is it's likely some info is out there just waiting to be discovered.

Also there is a finite list of Obama big wigs who would have been in on the plan to compromise Roberts. Which while being super hard to prove when you follow the dots it sure looks like that's what happened. If you are writing the brief for the conservative side of obamacare and you first write against obamacare and then out of the blue you change your mind and claim zero care was really a tax all along its a bit more than suspicious.

77 posted on 06/22/2020 8:50:56 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic home of free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I may disagree there. The fact that he wrote the against for obamacare sort of suggests conservative credentials. Also the fact that he rewrote the brief so quickly also suggests something happened. Dealing with obama who copied everything that the Clintons ever did my bet remains Roberts was compromised.It was and still is the Clinton way.


78 posted on 06/22/2020 8:55:11 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic home of free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Now that you mention it if you wanted to double compromise Roberts,threaten the loss of his kids on one hand and than offer to pay him on the other. He’s yours forever after that.


79 posted on 06/22/2020 11:41:45 AM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic home of free because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson