Posted on 04/25/2020 10:39:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
YouTube took down a video Friday posted by the bio-tech firm Aytu BioSience explaining a new UV light treatment for coronavirus patients. Aytu BioScience announced Tuesday the firm is working with Cedars-Sinai and the FDA to determine the efficacy of the treatment.
The video is now labeled, “This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Terms of Service”.
Original video with now dead link:
https://youtu.be/RZHQbKe9TtI
Copy posted and live for now:
CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO
Aytu BioScience promoted the video on Twitter Friday morning, “Many are now talking about UV light being used as a treatment for COVID-19. We are proud to have teamed up with @MarkPimentelMD and his team at @CedarsSinai. They developed Healight. Peer-reviewed data will be published in days, but here’s how it works:”
Aytu BioScience said this evening on Twitter that YouTube has not told them why the video was taken down, “That’s correct. We do not have any idea why. Our team has asked for clarification.”
With no explanation from YouTube forthcoming, Aytu BioScience posted the video to Vimeo Friday night:
Aytu_BioScience
@BioscienceAytu
· Apr 24, 2020
Many are now talking about UV light being used as a treatment for COVID-19. We are proud to have teamed up with @MarkPimentelMD and his team at @CedarsSinai. They developed Healight. Peer-reviewed data will be published in days, but here's how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZHQbKe9TtI …
I hope they prove the only cure is a deep UVC suntan, the orange kind Liberals claim President Trump has
They are probably owned by the same company that owns drudge retort.
It’s not a scam. It is currently shown at the top of the twitter page of Mark Pimentel, MD, currently the head of the Pimentel Laboratory and executive director of the Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program at Cedars-Sinai. This program focuses on the development of drugs, diagnostic tests and devices related to conditions of the microbiome.
The twitter link is valid and is shown at the bottom of https://www.cedars-sinai.org/research/labs/pimentel.html
https://twitter.com/markpimentelmd?lang=en
Retweet of @josh_disbrow - April 23
Introducing Healight! - being developed by @MarkPimentelMD
and his esteemed research team and now licensed to $AYTU
https://youtu.be/RZHQbKe9TtI via @YouTube.
@BioscienceAytu
If conservatives are too stupid to band together and turn all the major platforms into utiliites. then they deserve to be marginalized.
Info in the video confirms that a Trump statement is true. Youtube can’t have that.
Hope people saved it before it was scrubbed.
Do Not Want.
The 254 nm lights are very effective sterilizers; but, dangerous to humans. I have two UV-C (254 nm) lamps for room sterilization, just in case one of us becomes infected. It’s not safe to be in the room with them on. I doubt it would be safe to shine light of that frequency inside a person. (But, guessing doesn’t beat experimenting through clinical trials.)
The Far UV-C (222 nm) light is safe (as you point out) — and (IMHO) a better choice for internal use too. (Again — needs testing.)
What really excites me is the potential for using Far UV-C lamps to purify the air in public buildings. If Far UV-C were widely deployed in buildings, it could help return things to normal very quickly. Far UV-C lamps could be left on to kill all the airborne viruses, even while the buildings were being used by crowds of people. Drastically reducing the viral load (you might say the “Critical Mass”) would reduce spreading, and might result in more mild (vs. severe) cases of infection.
After viewing the re-uploaded AYTU Healight video; I would say that UV-A is the best candidate. I’m a bit surprised to learn that it’s powerful enough to kill the virus — but, there’s no doubt about the better penetration of that frequency.
Yes— Satan comes to kill, steal and destroy. I suppose if you are willing to turn a blnd eye to the killing of 700,000 babies in the womb each year, it is no problem to hope for a few 100,000 deaths of old people from coronavirus if it advances your political agenda. After all the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few.
Ding ding ding! You win the prize
May I ask what kind of UV C you have?
I have a swordfish installed in my furnace
I have an Airthereal ozone unit. I set the timer for 60 minutes, leave the house for 2 hours, and the air has a hint of post thunderstorm scent
Imagine, your next air flight.
The TSA dweebs use wands with UV capabilities.
The scanner you walk thru could include UV
The ramp/tunnel between the gate and plane door could be full of UV light
Take some time and review this current information on covid 19. It makes sense to me.
I have a couple of portable UV-C lamps I bought on Amazon. (Expect to wait at least a month for delivery.) One is a plug-in mercury-vapour tube type; the other is a battery-operated LED type. The LED type has many advantages — no danger of tubes breaking, output concentrated in the germicidal range, and easily portable. If I had it to do over, I would have gotten two of the LED types, and no tube types. I wanted two because the light only works where it shines — so, I wanted to zap rooms from at least two directions at once. The advantage of the portable units over ones installed in the ductwork is that they kill viruses on surfaces too.
I also have a similar O3 generator, which I have been using to sterilize rooms for several years now. The O3 works amazingly well (absolutely eliminated all problems with mould, mildew and pollen in the house — to say nothing of pet odours). The big drawback is the time required to clear the air after a treatment. That’s where the UV-C lights have an edge. If one of us is sick, and isolated to their own room and bathroom; I plan on running the lights whenever one of the rooms is vacant — even if it’s only for a few minutes. Waiting an hour or so to clear the air wouldn’t work.
That was great! I almost didn’t watch when I saw the length, but did anyhow. They said about what I’d posted here a few weeks ago, e.g., that forcing us to be locked away like fragile hothouse tomatoes will kill our immune systems. We’ll be “virus virgins”, and people will become more ill once we’re sprung from lockdown. (I actually think that’s what Fauci, et al., want — an extremely ill population as soon as the weather gets cold.)
The whole section about the immune system being compromised by SIP was exactly what I believe.
I recall when I was young, ladies in our church who had babies would keep them at home for weeks or months to (they believed) keep them from being sick. (We thought they used the babies as an excuse to stay home, but that’s another story.) Mom had us in church within days of birth. Later, Mom would chuckle because the other kids were fragile forever, and we never got sick. You MUST be exposed to the bad stuff.
On the video I noticed how the doctors tap danced around the reporters’ questions of why this SIP decree was done. The docs got right to the edge of the word, “political”, but never really went there.
Any and all competition to the Gates vaccine must be destroyed.
That vid deserves a thread of it’s own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.