Posted on 03/09/2019 10:30:11 AM PST by Starman417
It has begun. It will not be long before DNC meetings begin with the Islamic call to prayer.
Nancy Pelosi has surrendered her party to Islam. No matter what Pelosi says, Ilhan Omar is now in command. Pelosi has been cuckolded. Omar has spouted out a parade of antisemitic comments that have inflamed many on both sides of the aisle. She pretended to apologize but then continued her antisemitic rants. Members of the House- including democrats- wanted a resolution condemning her utterances but Pelosi protected her. Instead of properly singling her out Pelosi rolled a resolution condemning all "hate" and omitting Omar's name entirely. democrats claimed that a resolution condemning antisemitism would "alienate progressives."
Let that soak in for a second.
During her show on MSNBC Thursday, Ruhle marveled at how condemning bigotry had become difficult for the left. "This puts Nancy Pelosi in a tough spot," Ruhle said. "What was expected to be a simple vote has exposed a deep rift within the party."The DNC has made itself the party of antisemitism.Ruhle lamented the party's inability to directly confront anti-Semitism. "Why?" she asked. "Why would coming down hard on anti-Semitic speech alienate progressive groups?"
Her guests were at a loss to explain why a progressive movement anchored in "tolerance" and "inclusion" was struggling to identify and denounce anti-Jewish bigotry.
"It shouldn't," Reines said. "What she said was anti-Semitic. As a Jew who's a Democrat, this drives me crazy."
Omar, a member of the Progressive Caucus, has drawn scrutiny and condemnation since taking office in January for a series of anti-Semitic remarks.
In early February, Omar shared several ill-advised tweets concerning Jewish Americans, the state of Israel, and the United States government.
Pelosi started off wrong: Facing calls to pull Omar from the House Foreign Affairs Committee after the Minnesota freshmans third set of bigoted public remarks in just two months, the speaker instead went for a House resolution condemning anti-Semitism but not Omar herself.This is asinine.Yet even that turned out to be too much for Pelosis members. Days of watering the message down turned the resolution into seven pages of meaningless disapproval of all kinds of nastiness against every imaginable group. That pablum passed 407-23 with Omar herself happily voting aye.
Message: Democrats hate hate but when it comes to a hater in their own midst, theyll make excuses or even elevate the bigot.
Because Democratic leaders publicly bent over backward to excuse Omars continued use of classic anti-Jewish tropes. Pelosi claimed she doesnt believe that Omars comments were intended in any anti-Semitic way, and that the resolution is not about her. No. 2 House Democrat Steny Hoyer also insisted Omar isnt anti-Semitic.
And, in the most bizarre and offensive defense, No. 3 Jim Clyburn claimed Omars own experience as a Somali refugee means bigotry is more personal to her than to the children of Holocaust survivors.
Then Pelosi made things even worse with her pathetic defense of Omar, saying she doesn't "understand" her words. Pelosi:
The incident that happened with I dont think our colleague is anti-Semitic. I think she has a different experience in the use of words, doesnt understand that some of them are fraught with meaning, that she didnt realize. But nonetheless that we had to address. And so the question was, do you have one amendment that just talks about anti-Semitism I mean resolution, or one that addresses white supremacy, white so many of the Islamophobia all the rest of it.Omar has been in this country for two decades. She damn well understands.
(Excerpt) Read more at Floppingaces.net...
“The black caucus doesnt allow republican blacks in, so its all democrat.”
Are you sure? I thought Mia Love joined when she was first elected.
A default admission that *progressive* is just another word for racism and anti-semitism.
If that's *progressive*, then count me out.
I have always contended, that some 95% of all human woe is self-induced, by defiance or willful ignorance carried to extremes.
However, an exception must be made for Muslims. Fully 100% of all the persecutions and personal misfortunes they are subject to come about as a result of of their adherence to the literal words of the Koran, which calls for Muslims to actively subjugate all non-Muslims, while apparently not ever taking into account there just might be some push-back, and with particularly harsh outcomes clearly NOT predicted in the words of the prophet Mohammed.
yep
My information is from 3-5 years ago when two male republicans showed up for a meeting and were told they can’t be members.
During her show on MSNBC Thursday, Ruhle marveled at how condemning bigotry had become difficult for the left. "This puts Nancy Pelosi in a tough spot," Ruhle said. "What was expected to be a simple vote has exposed a deep rift within the party."
Ruhle lamented the party's inability to directly confront anti-Semitism. "Why?" she asked. "Why would coming down hard on anti-Semitic speech alienate progressive groups?"
Seriously? Obviously Ruhle is just another a partisan media shill.
Her guests were at a loss to explain why a progressive movement anchored in "tolerance" and "inclusion" was struggling to identify and denounce anti-Jewish bigotry.
"It shouldn't," Reines said. "What she said was anti-Semitic. As a Jew who's a Democrat, this drives me crazy."
A Jew who's a Democrat is already crazy. Thanks Starman417.
Their joint statement led with the news that the resolution marked the first time we have voted on a resolution condemning anti-Muslim bigotry.
see anything in that statement about anti-Semitism? source article for quote:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3733338/posts
“She has started condemning Obama and his failed policies of hope and change. Will they stick with Omar when she starts condemning homosexuality?”
Geeze - As bad as it is now, if Tucker could get an interview with here, it could be FIREWORKS in that party.
Actually, she has, but without saying the name.
The Muslim Brotherhood is applauding her every move!
Schiff? Nadler? They are both major committee heads.
Committee heads are not among the House leadership team of five Dems.
There’s a big smile on my face when I read what she’s saying/writing. Please Omar, tell us your real feelings. Pelosi deserves every bit of this.
Hawaii and New Mexico voted to do just that.
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=148159
http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=148141
CWII has already started, IMO. Not going to end well, ya think?
There’s probably a graphic out there showing just that.
Pelousi works for her Puppetmeister SorozNazi and she’s been kissing up to middle east Moslem dictators..
Congress should never have let this person be seated.
Congress should expel her NOW, no delays!
Nancy, follow constitutional provision and clean Congress of this filth, NOW!
Oh yeah, and pull her the hell off the committees you so generously awarded her with, including the Foreign Affairs committee which deals with some super-secret sensitive defense and diplomatic state secrets, information.
Get her OFF, NOW!
But no, you sold out America with your falsified or doctored “Obama is eligble” certification........you sold out America with your “Congress has to pass the O-care bill to be permitted to see what’s in it”
and now, you’ve sold out America with your seating and awarding access to sensitive governmental and defense secrets to this obviously anti-American, dangerous enemy agent/mole/operative.
It’s all about how much $$ Pelousi can make for herself
Imho.
$$$$$$
Of course, our congress-clowns are too preoccupied with reelection to care.
Giving aid and comfort to the enemy.... it’s old hat for the Demonicrats.
“CW-II will start when they come for our guns.”
Have you considered the opposite:
CW-II will start when we come for their guns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.