The BLM crowd has shown they have about 3/5 the normal intelligence - there may be something to this...
NEVER forget this!!!! The 3/5 clause is an ANTI-SLAVERY, ANTI-SLAVEHOLDER provision. The number of people who do NOT know this is staggeringly huge.
That’s due to the one word the left always wants us to do when they lose, and what they refuse to do when they win - compromise.
There is no debate, no room for discussion no different points of view as 3/5th is history and was and is designed solely to apportion the House. The black is irrelevant.
Instead of the 3/5 Compromise they should have extended Voting Rights to all people including Slaves.
Without this clause, the South would have had more Congressmen and the North would have had fewer. I challenge anyone, outside of the KKK and the Southern Democrats that were the predecessors to the KKK, to show how that would have been better for our country and the end of slavery!
I am trying to remember when the LEFTIST Progressives have been challenged by facts and errors. The Twelfth of Never, perhaps?
THE SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS WANTED TO BE ABLE TO CAST VOTES FOR ALL THEIR SLAVES Without letting the slave actually vote himself.
This compromise allowed the north to counteract at least 2/5 th’s of that.
I'll bet most of you didn't realize that immigrants from India who make too little to pay income taxes, are not counted by the Census Bureau every 10 years.
C'mon, fess up. You didn't know that, did you?
The Northerners didn’t want them to count at all.
Which is what it should have been. Why should people who have no say in the government be used to add electoral weight to another group of people who did?
They had no representation. Why count them and give the Plantation masters more power then they deserved?
Same thing happening today in California with the counting of illegals for the purpose of apportionment. A Congressional District based on non-citizens is an absurdity.
The slave holders wanted slaves counted as 5/5 of a constituent.
Counting slaves as a full constituent would have helped slave owners.
Counting them as not a constituent, I.e. 0/5 would be bad for the slavers.
3/5 had nothing to do with personhood. Never use that term when discussing this, use constituent.
I have heard even Condi Rice use this misunderstanding to connote racism of the past.
Only ignorant people think the 3/5 rule had anything to do with designating degree of humanity.
Free black constituents were 5/5. It had nothing to do with race and counting slaves as a full constituent was what the slavers wanted and was bad for slaves, good for slavery.
If they actually knew anything about history it was to take power away from the southern states. Had they been allowed to count their slaves as a whole then the south would have dominated the policies. In fact it took the north less than 80 years to completely abolish slavery. This would not have happened that quickly had the south been in control. In fact slavery may have still been present in the United States. Because they would have promoted slavery to each new state allowed into the union of states, instead of limit states that joined the union to have slaves.
I know the history.
I think, however, that a lot of the youngest generation does not see how anyone who was a slaveholder could be considered to have any moral authority at all, nor to be considered worthy of having their opinion given any weight on any subject. Context comes only with studying history, something many millennial and post millennial folks haven’t really absorbed yet.
I’m so tired of this subject but I know it will never go away.
Were, or are, the BLACK slave masters in Africa, then and now (2017), racists?
Bring REAL history and REAL discussion back to the classroom!
Slavery in modern Africa
Slavery in Africa continues today. Slavery existed in Africa before the arrival of Europeans - as did a slave trade that exported millions of sub-Saharan Africans to North Africa, the Middle East, and the Persian Gulf.[1] However, slavery and bondage are still African realities. Hundreds of thousands of Africans still suffer in silence in slave-like situations of forced labour and commercial sexual exploitation from which they cannot free themselves.
Modern-day enslavers also exploit lack of political will at the highest levels of some African governments to effectively tackle trafficking and its root causes. Weak interagency co-ordination and low funding levels for ministries tasked with prosecuting traffickers, preventing trafficking and protecting victims also enable traffickers to continue their operations. The transnational criminal nature of trafficking also overwhelms many countries' law enforcement agencies, which are not equipped to fight organized criminal gangs that operate across national boundaries with impunity.
Slavery by African country
Chad
IRIN (Integrated Regional Information Networks) of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reports children being sold to Arab herdsmen in Chad. As part of a new identity imposed on them the herdsman "...change their name, forbid them to speak in their native dialect, ban them from conversing with people from their own ethnic group and make them adopt Islam as their religion."[2]
Mali
The Malian government denies that slavery exists, however, the slavery in Timbuktu is obvious. Slavery still continues with some Tuaregs holding Bella people.[3]
Mauritania
A system exists now by which Arab Muslims -- the bidanes -- own black slaves, the haratines.[4] An estimated 90,000 black Mauritanians remain essentially enslaved to Arab/Berber owners.[5] The ruling bidanes (the name means literally white-skinned people) are descendants of the Sanhaja Berbers and Beni Hassan Arab tribes who emigrated to northwest Africa and present-day Western Sahara and Mauritania during the Middle Ages.[6] According to some estimates, up to 600,000 black Mauritanians, or 20% of the population, are still enslaved, many of them used as bonded labour.[7] Slavery in Mauritania was finally criminalized in August 2007.[8] Malouma Messoud, a former Muslim slave has explained her enslavement to a religious leader:
"We didn't learn this history in school; we simply grew up within this social hierarchy and lived it. Slaves believe that if they do not obey their masters, they will not go to paradise. They are raised in a social and religious system that everyday reinforces this idea.[9]"
In Mauritania, despite slave ownership having been banned by law in 1981, hereditary slavery continues.[10] Moreover, according to Amnesty International:
"Not only has the government denied the existence of slavery and failed to respond to cases brought to its attention, it has hampered the activities of organisations which are working on the issue, including by refusing to grant them official recognition".[11]
Imam El Hassan Ould Benyamin of Tayarat in 1997 expressed his views about earlier proclamations ending slavery in his country as follows:
"[it] is contrary to the teachings of the fundamental text of Islamic law, the Quran ... [and] amounts to the expropriation from muslims of their goods; goods that were acquired legally. The state, if it is Islamic, does not have the right to seize my house, my wife or my slave."[12]
Niger
In Niger, where the practice of slavery was outlawed in 2003, a study found that almost 8% of the population are still slaves.[13] Slavery dates back for centuries in Niger and was finally criminalised in 2003, after five years of lobbying by Anti-Slavery International and Nigerian human-rights group, Timidria.[14] More than 870,000 people still live in conditions of forced labour, according to Timidria, a local human rights group.[15][16]
Descent-based slavery, where generations of the same family are born into bondage, is traditionally practiced by at least four of Niger's eight ethnic groups. The slave masters are mostly from the nomadic tribes -- the Tuareg, Fulani, Toubou and Arabs.[17] It is especially rife among the warlike Tuareg, in the wild deserts of north and west Niger, who roam near the borders with Mali and Algeria.[18] In the region of Say on the right bank of the river Niger, it is estimated that three-quarters of the population around 1904-1905 was composed of slaves.[19]
Historically, the Tuareg swelled the ranks of their slaves during war raids into other peoples' lands. War was then the main source of supply of slaves, although many were bought at slave markets, run mostly by indigenous peoples.[20][21]
Sudan
Francis Bok, former Sudanese slave. At the age of seven, he was captured during a raid in Southern Sudan, and enslaved for ten years.(Courtesy Unitarian Universalist Association/Jeanette Leardi)
There has been a recrudescence of jihad slavery since 1983 in the Sudan.[23][24]
Slavery in the Sudan predates Islam, but continued under Islamic rulers and has never completely died out in Sudan. In the Sudan, Christian and animist captives in the civil war are often enslaved, and female prisoners are often used sexually, with their Muslim captors claiming that Islamic law grants them permission.[25] According to CBS news, slaves have been sold for $50 apiece. [1] In 2001 CNN reported the Bush administration was under pressure from Congress, including conservative Christians concerned about religious oppression and slavery, to address issues involved in the Sudanese conflict.[26] CNN has also quoted the U.S. State Department's allegations: "The [Sudanese] government's support of slavery and its continued military action which has resulted in numerous deaths are due in part to the victims' religious beliefs." [2]
Jok Madut Jok, professor of History at Loyola Marymount University, states that the abduction of women and children of the south by north is slavery by any definition. The government of Sudan insists that the whole matter is no more than the traditional tribal feuding over resources.[27]
It is estimated that as many as 200,000 people had been taken into slavery during the Second Sudanese Civil War. The slaves are mostly Dinka people.[28][29]
South Africa
Despite significant efforts made by the South African Government to combat trafficking in persons the country has been placed on the "Tier 2 Watch List" by the US Department of Trafficking in Persons,for the past four years.[47] South Africa shares borders with Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Mozambique and Swaziland. It has 72 official ports of entry "and a number of unofficial ports of entry where people come in and out without being detected" along its 5 000 km-long land borderline. The problem of porous borders is compounded by the lack of adequately trained employees, resulting in few police officials controlling large portions of the country's coastline.
Child slave trade
The trading of children has been reported in modern Nigeria and Benin.[30] The children are kidnapped or purchased for $20 - $70 each by slavers in poorer states, such as Benin and Togo, and sold into slavery in sex dens or as unpaid domestic servants for $350.00 each in wealthier oil-rich states, such as Nigeria and Gabon.[31] [32]
Ghana, Togo, Benin
In parts of Ghana, a family may be punished for an offense by having to turn over a virgin female to serve as a sex slave within the offended family.[33] In this instance, the woman does not gain the title of "wife". In parts of Ghana, Togo, and Benin, shrine slavery persists, despite being illegal in Ghana since 1998. In this system of slavery, sometimes called trokosi (in Ghana) or voodoosi in Togo and Benin, or ritual servitude, young virgin girls are given as slaves in traditional shrines and are used sexually by the priests in addition to providing free labor for the shrine.[34]
Ethiopia
Mahider Bitew, Children's Rights and Protection expert at the Ministry of Women's Affairs, says that some isolated studies conducted in Dire Dawa, Shashemene, Awassa and three other towns of the country indicate that the problem of child trafficking is very serious. According to a 2003 study about one thousand children were trafficked via Dire Dawa to countries of the Middle East. The majority of those children were girls, most of whom were forced to be sex workers after leaving the country. The International Labor Organization (ILO) has identified prostitution as the Worst Form of Child Labor.[35]
In Ethiopia, children are trafficked into prostitution, to provide cheap or unpaid labor and to work as domestic servants or beggars. The ages of these children are usually between 10 and 18 and their trafficking is from the country to urban centers and from cities to the country. Boys are often expected to work in activities such as herding cattle in rural areas and in the weaving industry in Addis Ababa, and other major towns. Girls are expected to take responsibilities for domestic chores, childcare and looking after the sick and to work as prostitutes.[35]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_modern_Africa
Or,
*******************************************************************
The Price in Blood
Casualties in the Civil War
At least 618,000 Americans died in the Civil War, and some experts say the toll reached 700,000.
The number that is most often quoted is 620,000. At any rate, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam.
The Union armies had from 2,500,000 to 2,750,000 men. Their losses, by the best estimates:
Battle deaths: 110,070
Disease, etc: 250,152
Total 360,222
The Confederate strength, known less accurately because of missing records, was from 750,000 to 1,250,000. Its estimated losses:
Battle deaths: 94,000
Disease, etc: 164,000
Total: 258,000
Well, the South considered the slaves property, and thus were not allowed to vote. The North objected, and asked why property should be counted for representation, when the South was clearly denying that representation.
The South was not going to join the Union without a compromise. If there was not compromise, there’s no USA, and slavery would have continued unabated. Once the Union was formed, the abolitionist of the North, took action to limit the spread.
Who cares? I will not disavow my forefathers.
Were our Founding Fathers “racist”?
Well, of course they were, in the sense that everyone is. The word itself is of recent vintage and is without fixed meaning.
The 1790 Naturalization Act specified that naturalization was restricted to “immigrants who were free white persons of good character”.
But this is common, even in the 21st century. Zimbabwe is for blacks, by their own declaration. Japan is for Japanese. Malaysia admits (grudgingly) Chinese, but they are disadvantaged in law and by custom, and no one objects. Israel is a Jewish state.
As far as the “3/5 of a person” lie, it was’t meant to devalue blacks, but rather to reduce the representation in the House of Representatives of states which permitted slavery.
Our founding Fathers wer geniuses down to the last man, and some of the greatest men to walk this Earth.