Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/29/2016 10:56:24 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

Beware the media. The Empire Strikes Back will happen shortly. Be prepared. They are corrupt.

Talk others into voting Trump.


2 posted on 10/29/2016 10:57:13 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

It’ll come down to what the meaning of, ‘is’ is, most likely.

*Rolleyes*

I HATE these people! HATE THEM!


3 posted on 10/29/2016 10:58:39 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I don’t agree with your reasoning. “Pertinent to an investigation” doesn’t mean they contain evidence indicative of one thing or another.


4 posted on 10/29/2016 11:00:05 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

AMERICANS HAVE 10 SECOND ATTENTION SPANS.

All they know is she is in trouble AGAIN!

All they knew about Trump was that he used such “demeaning” words. If they watched the video they would have died laughing like I did.

THEY will not pay attention to anything but the headlines.

She’s sunk.

Obama just wants to get the hell out without an indictment hanging over his head and he will sell everybody out. He’s for obama. Always has been.

Nate Silver said this HELPS hillary because Weiner will get all the attention!!!!!!

I wish I remembered how to post threads!! IT’s hysterical!!


7 posted on 10/29/2016 11:04:23 AM PDT by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

They had more than enough to send Hillary to prison before.


9 posted on 10/29/2016 11:09:32 AM PDT by IC Ken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

This is a very understandable and easy way to frame this at this point: If you were to apply to any job in government you would not be hired if you were under criminal investigation. Trump’s campaign needs to drum this into the public consciousness over the next 9 days.


10 posted on 10/29/2016 11:10:03 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I wonder if Comey has found something that does prove intent on Hillary’s part.

Otherwise, he would just say it was the same as what they’d already found.

I love the smell of Democrat fear. It smells like justice.


11 posted on 10/29/2016 11:10:26 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Comey has been raked over the coals by many for his protection of Hillary on the supposed investigation with his conclusion of “no intent” and rightfully so.

I believe there’s a showing of criminality of Clinton in these emails and Comey doesn’t want to go down in history as a complete traitor by covering up for her again.


12 posted on 10/29/2016 11:12:21 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Comey went against the advice of Lynch on sending the letters to Congress. I believe he knows there is something "pertinent" in the tens of thousands of emails they found on Weiner's laptop. Why alert both parties in Congress of a further investigation if there wasn't anything there? He could have just kept it under wraps, unless he was being threatened by agents to go public with them if he didn't do it himself.

Frankly, the fact that there were that many State Department emails found on Weiner's personal laptop should be investigated as criminal matter, whether any of them contain classified info or not. They were sent over an unsecured network, and stored on a laptop outside of the State Department. I believe Huma claimed she sent the emails to Weiner's laptop because she had trouble printing them at the Department. She said she would share those printed copies with Hillary. What that tells me is that she didn't want anyone at State Department knowing she was making paper copies of those emails, and thus sent them to her husband's home laptop so she could do with them what she wanted without the prying eyes of other State Department personnel. And did she ever really "share" those paper copies with Hillary, or with the enemies of this country?

14 posted on 10/29/2016 11:15:20 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Since many of my relatives are liberals, and I myself am a former union thug, I speak Weasel, fluently. I therefore provide, as an exclusive public service to Free Republic my line-by-line translation of James (aka "Jimmy The Weasel") Comey's letter:

Dear Messrs Chairmen:

In previous congressional testimony, l referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server.

After I blatantly lied my @ss off about the Espionage Act, I came to your house and told you in your face that was the end of it.

Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

Unfortunately, our cover-up was incomplete, so I'm trying to clean up the mess.

In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation.

Somebody outside the FBI has their hands on evidence we tried to destroy or immunize away.

I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

Some of my flunkies came to me in a panic, and warned me that the whole rotten sh!thouse was about to go up in flames, and we've spent all day trying to figure out how to minimize the damage.

Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant,

We're not sure we're going to be able to cover the new evidence up.

and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work,

We'll try our best to run out the clock between now and November 8th so at the very least we can all be pardoned,

I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.

It's likely that honest people not under our control will obtain the information, and release it, and I need to cover my @ss, and protect Loretta Lynch and Barack 0bama, if that's even still possible.

Sincerely yours, James B. Comey Director

With deepest regrets and mounting alarm, James "Jimmy The Weasel" Comey.

23 posted on 10/29/2016 11:25:55 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The ambiguity inthe letter and the Friday news dump, Comey is still doing everything he can for Hillary.


26 posted on 10/29/2016 11:29:19 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Bondi went on to say that if she applied for a job in government and checked the box on the application that asks if she's under criminal investigation then she would not be hired. If she applied for any job and revealed she is under FBI criminal investigation that she would not be hired.

...and I she lied in that application, she would be prohibited forever from serving in ANY Federal elected or appointed office!

27 posted on 10/29/2016 11:30:12 AM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
He had a choice... He could report to congress that his testimony needed to be revised, or he could have kept it secret and faced possible perjury charges when the existence of the emails and the reopening of the investigation was reported by the NY Post, or Fox News, etc... God knows, if the NY Slimes or the Washington Post found out, they would have kept secret until after the election.

He wasn't breaking news though, he was preempting it by telling the truth before it was exposed by somebody else... And despite Hillary's lame assertion (i.e. lie) that the first she heard of this was from the media, I'm pretty sure Hillary and Huma have been aware for some time that the emails were found and that the investigation had been reopened previous to his announcement.

Emails on Huma's computer confiscated by the NYPD in the most Democrat state in America are found and the cops told the democrat prosecutor, who in turn told his boss, who in turn told his boss, who in turn told the mayor, who in turn told the FBI and somehow after going through all those Democrat channels, not one soul bothered to inform Huma and Hillary.... That is laughable at best.

32 posted on 10/29/2016 11:35:48 AM PDT by jerod (Pro-Abortion Gun Control Freaks & Environmental Nuts who hated Capitalism? The Nazi's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

from NYT - here’s what we can expect:

In conference calls, email chains and overnight text messages, Clinton aides provided talking points for allies to convey a coordinated message that the campaign was confident that the F.B.I. would find nothing to hurt Mrs. Clinton in the new inquiry. According to several party officials, donors and campaign surrogates appearing on television, the greater concern is that an election that seemed like Mrs. Clinton’s to lose will now be thrown into doubt, depressing some of her supporters while rallying Republicans around down-ballot candidates and even their battered presidential nominee, Donald J. Trump.

In a conference call with campaign surrogates on Friday night, a rare gathering at the start of a weekend, Clinton advisers asked them to push a coordinated message in news media interviews and with voters: that the F.B.I. investigation had not been reopened; that none of the new emails had emerged from Mrs. Clinton; that the F.B.I. had to release more details about its inquiry; and that they were concerned that Mr. Comey had taken this action.


33 posted on 10/29/2016 11:37:16 AM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Something was there when she got off the plane too...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98gCBZbWqqs

This video has a clip of Hillary’s first rally after getting off her plane yesterday.

At about 1:10 in the video, we have Hillary saying:
“Donald Trump says he can still win, and ya know, he’s right, anything can happen inna lection.”

She sounds inebriated. I’ve never heard her slur her words before. In the very next clip she enunciates very clearly.


50 posted on 10/29/2016 12:06:16 PM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The “team” thought them pertinent. Comey thought them pertinent. Whomever Comey consulted thought them pertinent. The lying msm, not so much.


52 posted on 10/29/2016 12:12:37 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Huma obviously lied to the investigators that she turned over all devices that might be pertinent to the investigation. Even if these are all the “same old e-mails” she didn’t fully cooperate with the investigation, and she should be in grave legal jeopardy.


57 posted on 10/29/2016 12:33:38 PM PDT by sharkhawk (GO CUBS GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

They never would have re-opened the criminal investigation if something was not there. They would not want to look like fools ....


70 posted on 10/29/2016 3:17:32 PM PDT by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

If there isn’t something in 650,000 emails, the laws of Statistics will have to be repealed.


80 posted on 10/30/2016 3:26:03 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson