'Why' may be already answered. So the question becomes, at what stage is the FEC Inquiry into the CruzPAC-to-CarlyPAC transfer? Do we need an FOIA to find out?
Posted on 03/27/2016 8:42:11 AM PDT by bigbob
Let's look into Sarah Isgur Flores shall we? It is inferred by current reporting that she is at least one of the 8 or 9 women Cruz has had an affair with recently. (excerpted)
The ($500K, excerpted) money from the Fiorina campaign was laundered through a company called MLJ Consulting. Nearly half of the money spent on ads, over $251,795, was paid to MLJ Consulting. On top of that, MLJ Consulting received an additional $271,152 for services described in FEC reports as “Political Strategy Consulting/Staff Management” or “Political Strategy Consulting/Travel.” (The FEC is currently requesting coordinating information on the payments and deposits left out in the filing by the Fiorina campaign.)
The payments to MLJ from the PAC Unlocking Potential have continued into the current campaign cycle. Nearly half of the $210,656 the super PAC has spent has been paid to MLJ Consulting, mostly for “Political Strategy Consulting/Staff Management.” The campaign and both super PACs, Unlocking Potential, Carly for America and MLJ Consulting seem to have secretly worked with Sarah Isgur Flores.
Sarah Isgur Flores received a one-time payroll check of $3,582 from Unlocking Potential, which she joined in February 2015 after leaving the Republican National Committee. Two months later, she was paid $148,375 by Carly for America, the super PAC. And one week after that, Flores received an in-kind payment of $12,700 from the Fiorina campaign. She then began receiving biweekly payroll checks of $10,052 as the deputy director of Fiorina’s campaign. This is the most reasonable manner that the 'Hush Money' was paid by Keep the Promise I. (The Ted Cruz Super PAC Operation!)
Now my question is very simple: (excerpted) It's the same kind of logical deduction that brings to mind that something stinks.
(Excerpt) Read more at elgross.biz ...
If you’re not smart enough to start another thread, or you want to go off-topic “here”, I’m not helping you in either circumstance, Tedlim.
There is no reason to start another thread. There is every reason for you to avoid debate on Kelo and property rights if you are intent on defending Kelo and Trumps interpretation of the Takings Clause.
'Why' may be already answered. So the question becomes, at what stage is the FEC Inquiry into the CruzPAC-to-CarlyPAC transfer? Do we need an FOIA to find out?
What role could a President play, in repealing Kelo or in any manner affecting eminent domain? I didn’t like that decision myself, Kelo, thought it was wrong. How would a President change that though, seriously? I don’t see that he (or she) could. It’s not within the powers delegated to the Executive Branch.
Trump is just a better con artist.
He gave a good speech!
I bet you think he’s gonna make your mortgage payment and fill your car with gas.
Oh, come on now. I don’t need someone to put gas in my car.
I/We desperately need a President who will at least try to save what is left of our country. Is Raphael that man..no. (He won’t even produce his US birth documents, or disclose loans to the FEC, which to me shows a lack of character, as well as trust).
Trump is Trump, if you don’t want top vote for him, so be it. But, from what I’ve seen of Raphael, he’s nothing more than Jimmy Swaggart with an “R” after his name...I’ll pass.
The article mentions “8 or 9” mistresses, when the 3 additional were simply mentioned in a fake photoshopped internet photo that has been debunked all over the place, and was obvious as a fake to anyone who saw it the first time.
It is absolutely shameful to smear a man over false, made-up facts. These rumors coming from no-name blogs should be totally squelched. Especially anything that runs with the fake “info” from the photoshopped image of “3 additional” mistresses.
Jeesh this is crazy.....you get to post idiocy like this and I have to submit my relies for approval
Posted on 03/27/2016 10:44:30 AM PDT by StAnDeliver
Kelo v. City of New London
Yeah cuz the 3 extra mistresses were just overkill...
I agree the Executive has no power to overturn Kelo except for the bully pulpit.
But the Executive does have the power to use Kelo. I view property rights on the same level as the RTKABA, speech in all its forms and the freedom to practice ones religion free of government mandates and intervention.
Very difficult for me personally to support candidates who don’t agree
But in the end it is always a choice in degree. Especially here in CT. Though I have admittedly written in candidates for POTUS twice before. Ronald Reagan and Duncan Hunter. I am sure that dates me and gives you an idea of why I can be recalcitrant here at FR.
Dude, your link leads to this thread. Would you like me to give you a primer on HTML as well as Kelo? :-)
Trump isn’t running around pretending to be Mr. Perfect Saint.
Cruz wears a holier than thou mantle and expects people to believe he is the anointed one.
Its also not Trumps fault if we find out Teddy has been putting the lime in the wrong coconut. :-)
I don’t and I won’t engage in speculation.
And it needs to be explained.
It stinks to high heaven.
“...C’mon Free Republic, you’re better than that.”
*************************************************************
Yes, since they have nothing else, Trumpsters collect every half-wit’s unsubstanciated rumor off of their Twitter feed or Internet posting and post it here if they think it will help degrade the Cruz campaign.
It’s what they do.
Sorry, you’re wrong of course. tRump is running as the best of everything. Just listen to him. He’s better at everything than anybody else. According to the Donald he has no sins.
1. The Donald is not even a conservative, much less a “perfect one”
2. He most certainly is running on the perfect little family values platform He drags his “perfect” kids around so they can flap their pie holes about how great their cheating dad is.
3. I seriously doubt we know 10% of the Donald’s slimy behavior. Being a cheater is the least of them.
How clever!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.