Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: StAnDeliver

There is no reason to start another thread. There is every reason for you to avoid debate on Kelo and property rights if you are intent on defending Kelo and Trumps interpretation of the Takings Clause.


63 posted on 03/27/2016 10:30:24 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

What role could a President play, in repealing Kelo or in any manner affecting eminent domain? I didn’t like that decision myself, Kelo, thought it was wrong. How would a President change that though, seriously? I don’t see that he (or she) could. It’s not within the powers delegated to the Executive Branch.


65 posted on 03/27/2016 10:36:27 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: jwalsh07
Here ya go, Tedlim. I'll be there in a minute.


Easter Sunday Chat: Kelo v. City of New London
March 27, 2016 | self

Posted on 03/27/2016 10:44:30 AM PDT by StAnDeliver

Kelo v. City of New London


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Chit/Chat; Test Topic, Ignore It; Weird Stuff; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: cruz; kelo; tedlim; trump; Click to Add Keyword
[ Report Abuse | Bookmark ]
White to open. Knight takes parking lot...
1 posted on 03/27/2016 10:44:30 AM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse]

69 posted on 03/27/2016 10:49:09 AM PDT by StAnDeliver ("Too bad your overhauled unicorn start-up failed, Ted.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson