Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is a Reasonable Upper Limit on Gun Ownership in the United States?
Gun Watch ^ | 7 February, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 02/10/2016 4:51:22 AM PST by marktwain


January of 2016 had the highest number of NICS checks for any January on record.  There were 2,545,802 million checks, which translates to a bit less than 1.9 million new firearms. The industry is producing firearms as fast as they can, and they are being purchased just as fast.  The demand side is crowded with first time buyers, women, and young urbans.  Where will it end?

Disarmists, those who wish us to be disarmed, constantly talk about "need".  Need is something they seem to think that they are the only ones qualified to define.  The idea of "need" is a semantic trick to appeal to parents, especially women.  Parents are constantly required to determine "needs" versus wants.  This is because the parents are paying for what their child obtains.  "Needs" are finite.  Wants are infinite.  If parents allow children to get whatever they want, the family goes bankrupt, or the children never learn self discipline.  With adults, this is not normally a problem.  Reality makes the distinction between "needs" and wants.  No one can get everything they "want", because resources are finite at any given time.  I might "want" a completely manned aircraft carrier fighting group; but I cannot afford it.  Neither can Donald Trump.

The disarmists attempt to translate parental requirements for "needs" and "wants" onto other adults.  Much of disarmist rhetoric focuses on defining adults as children that must be taken care of.

In the United States, we advanced beyond "needs" a long time ago.  Most "poor" people in the United States would be upper middle class in most of the rest of the world.  People do not "need" central heating, air conditioning, television, cell phones, or microwave ovens.

In the U.S., such things are taken for granted.  We are a consumerist society.  We mostly divide our disposable income into things that we want, rather than what we need to survive.

The United States has the highest number of automobiles per capita, on the planet.  We also have the highest number of firearms on the planet.  The current firearms number is approaching 1.25 for every man woman and child in the United States.

But what is a practical upper limit on the number of firearms produced?  Firearms are not like most consumer products.  They seldom wear out; their expected life, given moderate care and use, is centuries.  It is likely that completely different weapons technology will eclipse firearms before the modern stainless steel and composite stock firearms wear out.  It is one of the reasons that the current number of firearms in the United States is over 400 million.

Firearms are closer to finely crafted utensils than they are to automobiles.  People still have and use utensils that were made in the 1800s.  Often, they become family heirlooms, occupying a prominent place in a display cabinet, even if they are seldom used. A person is likely to have a pitcher or a gravy bowl that has been in the family for several generations; such objects are far more fragile than firearms.

Once a person becomes familiar with firearms, they realize that one firearm does not serve for all situations.  In times of normal ammunition availability, a .22 rifle and pistol are virtually required for practice and training.  A centerfire handgun is the favored tool for personal carry;  a centerfire rifle for hunting, perhaps another for zombie defense, home defense, and neighborhood security during times of unrest; and the ubiquitous shotgun for hunting and home defense.

In that short paragraph, we have six firearms.  It is not unreasonable that each adult would want to have their own.  There are about 237 million adults in the United States as of the end of 2015.

Six times 237 million is 1.4 billion firearms, about 3.5 times the current number.

Even at the current fevered pace, we are producing only 17 million firearms per year. It would take about 50 years of such production to meet the measly 1.4 billion minimal "limit" that I have arbitrarily set. 

Some firearms, for some people, some of the time are a clear "need".  But most firearms, for most people, most of the time, are a "want".   For people who explore the finer points of firearm ownership, owning a hundred firearms is not unusual. 

Firearms are fun, are easy to store and take care of, have a good history of maintaining value, and offer a hedge against hard times and difficulty that even gold and silver do not.  They are safer than swimming pools, stairs and bicycles. There is little reason to believe that the numbers have an upper limit based on market saturation, for decades to come.  Human "want" has no limit.

Definition of  disarmist

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Hobbies; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; gunownership; numbersofguns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: Gaffer

There is NO REASON why the serial number of a weapon should be on the Background check. You voluntarily give the government the information they need when they want to confiscate your weapons.


61 posted on 02/10/2016 7:21:22 PM PST by B4Ranch (https://www.22kill.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Those weapons, while cool when developed, will never be allowed into private hands; even though they are exactly what the founders wanted the people to have.


62 posted on 02/10/2016 7:42:52 PM PST by correctthought ("Obamunism is a temporary setback on the road to freedom" - Liberty Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasGal
Wonder if that constitutes "too many" in the government's eyes?

If you lived in New Jersey, Massachusetts or New York

One

63 posted on 02/10/2016 11:16:50 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

3 places, God willing, I will never have to live.


64 posted on 02/10/2016 11:40:09 PM PST by DallasGal (Hell hath no fury like a Texas gal you've done pissed off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: showme_the_Glory
I would like to kill the shark and take his laser, and strap it on!

Mounted on a motorcycle helmet, then go hunting for zero and Bernie stickered cars.

The possibilities are endless.

65 posted on 02/10/2016 11:44:22 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DallasGal

Amen sister!


66 posted on 02/11/2016 1:59:30 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: going hot

Waay better than a gopro


67 posted on 02/11/2016 4:54:13 AM PST by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: showme_the_Glory
Just got a go pro on my helmet (Christmas prez from wife) and finally rigged it up and weather was sufficient to go riding. it is cool.

First thing I thought was a laser alongside would be even more cool.

68 posted on 02/11/2016 8:16:00 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: going hot

I bought one last summer and took it scuba diving in the FL Keys. I was amazed how good the video was right out of the box. I added a red filter and now I’m really happy with the quality.


69 posted on 02/11/2016 11:12:58 AM PST by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The same as the Freedom of Speech.


70 posted on 02/11/2016 12:08:36 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson