Comments?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
2 posted on
10/04/2015 10:56:36 PM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama would debate under two conditions:
1. He could use a teleprompter
2. Candy Crowley would be the moderator.
3 posted on
10/04/2015 11:02:05 PM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(With Trump & Cruz, America can't lose!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
0bama is good for the NRA and gun ownership.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama is too much of a pu$$y. Hw would get his a$$ handed to him.
7 posted on
10/04/2015 11:10:00 PM PDT by
ColdSteelTalon
(Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here's the rub, HIPAA laws (which the obam supports) forbid the discussion of personal health information with another person without permission of the patient. So nothing can be done WRT mental health carve-outs for gun ownership. It's sad these petty little dictators, who aren't very bright, will have their personal security protected by very brave men with guns, at taxpayer expense for the rest of their lives.
I might be able to support a bill that curtailed some gun ownership rights, provided that bill contained the language that all who vote in favor of the law will be required to surrender their personal arms and will be forever forbidden ownership rights. Anybody who signs that legislation, likewise will surrender any and all personal arms, and will never be able to obtain a firearm and no money from the federal treasury shall be expended to protect that signer in the future.
8 posted on
10/04/2015 11:20:24 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama would lose the debate.
Gun control is a strawman argument that rests upon the easily refutable notion the law will restrain bad guys.
People who are determined to commit murder, no law in the world is going to stop them.
Its that simple. The only way to stop them is with a good person with a gun.
But liberals like Obama and Jonathan Alter have turned this country into a charnel house by stripping Americans of their God-given right to defend themselves.
And my constitutional RKBA is not subject to Obama and Alter’s good grace.
God these people should hear themselves; they’re stupid and they don’t know it.
I wouldn’t like them to inflict their ignorance upon the rest of us.
9 posted on
10/04/2015 11:28:01 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He could also have a debate on abortion.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Unfortunately, when Obama makes this or other irrefutable arguments, few hear them. I stopped reading right there.
There is nothing "irrefutable" about it!
It's the same mentaldeficient that causes Hussein to overuse the meaningless phrase "It's the right thing to do." Saying it does not make it true or fact.
I also suspect that the number of lives saved by owners of legal private firearms by non felons, will not be mentioned. The number dwarfs overwhelmingly the number of murders committed by thugs, felons and other hoods in possession of illegal firearms.
But the suggestion of a national debate is excellent! But will never happen. There aren't enough teleprompters in the world for that African mental deficient to be able to raise any kind of challenge.
11 posted on
10/04/2015 11:40:01 PM PDT by
publius911
(Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The side that’s losing always wants debates.
12 posted on
10/04/2015 11:50:28 PM PDT by
Hugin
("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man Standing.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
When Obama faced Mitt Romney in their first debate in 2012, which was carried by several networks, 67 million people tuned in. And, facing an opponent without much political conviction or desire for the presidency on a narrow range of issues entirely framed, formed, and asked by his handlers and the collaborationist press, and moderated by suckups who barely concealed their partisanship The Chair® still got his ass completely handed to him.
Anyone who thinks Barack 0bama could win a debate against Wayne LaPierre on the RKBA is living in a dream world. 0bama has about 50% of the IQ that people like Jonathan Alter credit him with, but even he is not stupid enough to issue this challenge, and if he is, ValJar is not.
13 posted on
10/04/2015 11:50:31 PM PDT by
FredZarguna
(A Kenyan appears to have infiltrated the lumberyard.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
14 posted on
10/04/2015 11:52:43 PM PDT by
sargon
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I believe John Locke had a conversation with Hussein..once upon a time...where Hussein told him...He did not think people..( private American citizens..Didn't need to own guns. PERIOD. )
Correct me if I'm wrong.
15 posted on
10/04/2015 11:57:30 PM PDT by
Osage Orange
(Obama practices "religion" in the mirror.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think it's pretty funny that Alter uses TR at the end of his screed. Teddy probably brought all his rifles, shotguns and pistols right into the White House.
Eek!
16 posted on
10/05/2015 12:08:49 AM PDT by
metesky
(My investment program is holding steady @ $0.05 cents a can.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No comments section on the Daily Beast Site. LOL
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Seriously? LaPierre would stomp 0bama’s ass in that debate, and doubly so if loser-in-chief was sans teleprompter. I’d give $20 to see it [but only to the NRA].
18 posted on
10/05/2015 1:35:19 AM PDT by
W.
(I piss on the militant muslims & their horrid koran! GTFO of my America!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I rather see Obama debate Ted Nugent.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama needs Wayne LaPierre.
LaPierre does NOT need Obama.
21 posted on
10/05/2015 3:52:40 AM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Barack Obama should challenge Wayne LaPierre, longtime leader of the National Rifle Association, to a one-hour primetime televised debate. As a member of the NRA, I'd triple my donation to the NRA, to pay for NRA ads during the debates.
Wayne would kick obummer's ass so badly, that even the Brady gun control crew would switch sides.
Even with the msm and their slanted questions, the facts would over-power the mooselimb, halfrican, communist, prick.
22 posted on
10/05/2015 3:57:03 AM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"So we have the status quo:
a country that overwhelmingly favors a gun bill but a Congress that opposes it."
What country are they talking about?
25 posted on
10/05/2015 4:48:43 AM PDT by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why not take all the existing gun laws and all the proposed new gun laws and make a test case somewhere by rigorously enforcing them to see how effective they can be in stopping/preventing gun violence.
Perhaps a liberal Utopia like...um...Chicago!
26 posted on
10/05/2015 4:56:45 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson