Posted on 09/17/2015 6:31:47 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
Posted on September 17, 2015 by sundance
OAN/GRAVIS have published an exclusive poll based entirely on the results from last night’s CNN debate (full pdf below). The poll shows the majority of those questioned viewed Carly Fiorina won the debate and reflects a predictable surge:
According to this result, both Fiorina and Rubio gained status and favorable opinion amid those Republicans polled.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
“Had he not let Chucky Schumer snooker him in that gang of 8 nonsense - “
Oh, please.... Marco Rubio wasn’t snookered one iota.
But he’s a slick enough conman to convince people that he’s just a poor little boy who got taken advantage of by evil old Chuckie Schumer.
Well if that’s true then he’s too stupid and naive to be anywhere near the Presidency. But he’s not stupid, he’s dishonest, and he knew exactly what he was getting into with Schumer because he’d been there before.
Before he became a Senator Marco Rubio had a long history in the Florida legislature of sabotaging attempts to do something about their illegal alien problem.
He’s always been an amnesty pusher and a little bit of research at some of the immigration control websites would dispel the illusion that he was ever anything else.
Because it certainly backfired is my best guess.
Trump: Fiorina Made Fun of Boxer’s Looks
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/trump-fiorina-double-standard-looks/2015/09/17/id/692142/
Dana Loach.I think your opinion has merit.
I think they would be called racists if they liked Trump because that is what Beck calls the tea party people who like him.
Now we know why they cooked up a push poll was quick with the PR firm. I knew it was odd .
Yes, I saw that. And it just came out Carly made fun of Meg Whitman’s looks too. Haven’t heard that one yet. Hope it pops up on FR.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if he just decided “i’m 69, the country is falling apart, and I have enough money at this point””
That’s been my suspicion as well. Plus I doubt that he was ever that serious about politics before so his positions are more of a grab bag than anything consistent.
My guess is that he’s a patriot. He remembers America from the early ‘60s before the country started down the road to hell. And when he says he wants to make America great again that’s exactly what his goal is.
Trump as the ceo of a major firm is used to surrounding himself with a very competent staff. An old Reagan admin maxim is “personnel is policy”. What will be telling is who he chooses to work with him. At this stage he has some sort of relationship with Ted Cruz. A good sign IMO.
Nope. Beck’s a moron but his analysis on Rubio was right.
I’m 100% a Cruz guy and that won’t change. But my wife and I both watched the debate, in different locations. We agreed to judge it based on who would would think won if we didn’t know anything about the candidates.
We both thought Rubio was far and away the standout. He was articulate, passionate and just came across as a confident, able person. If I didn’t know about his amnesty background I would have become a Rubio guy.
I think a LOT of people saw the same thing.
Hank
Then explain his poll numbers.
Good routine.
I have a strong suspicion that Medved and Hewitt played some role in Dubya’s administration. Probably helping with speeches. And giving really bad advice like “go for amnesty” and “once we get rid of Saddam the Iraqis will be just like us”.
Whatever their actual role, if any, they are certainly intimate with the GOPe and act as a propaganda arm for them. I try to catch some of Medved’s program to see what the party line is for the day. I used to catch some of Hewitt but Levin has his slot now.
Not sure I understand the question. I was just talking about his debate performance.
Hank
Is that right? Hmmmm..Thanks for looking into that.
“Tank you veddy much Alecks
I agree with you, this is not the time for a woman president. However, if this nation is able to reverse our death spiral and return to our JudeoChristian roots, become a moral, just, united people, there will be women presidents; elected because they are the right people at the right times, and gender will be entirely irrelevant, as it was for Margaret Thatcher.
<< It looked like everything dropped :-/ >>
LOL! In this case, those close ups are heck, aren’t they!
Rubio? Was there a different debate that I didn’t see?
***************************
Agree! Saw the re-run of M Kelly and she was pushing Carly and Rubio, while trashing Trump.
All I’ve seen Rubio do is repeat his memorized talking points at every opportunity.
I’m really frustrated about how most of the talking heads (except Hannity) try so hard to ignore Ted Cruz and, instead, push for squishes.
Mark Levin made some comment on today’s show about Marco, but I missed it. He said something that he and Marco don’t talk any more.
***************************
Probably because Levin is Conservative and Rubio doesn’t have a clue as to what that word means.
does anyone think it’s in any way a Good Idea to even think about electing a female Prez, when our most immediate and dangerous enemies are Islamists?
**************************
Why did Obama think it was a good idea to select Hillary as SecState, when he knew she would get no respect in dealing with the Muslims? ...Obama has supported all of the unrest caused by Muslims. .....Also partially explains why Hillary has no single positive accomplishment as SecState (or Senator or FLOTUS).
I might feel less strongly about it, if we HAD a Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir to field.
Voting for either Clinton or Fiorina is laughable in this context alone.
-JT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.