The Open Letter (to Rainbow-y Relatives and Friends) That Demands a Response

self | 6/28/15 | NewJerseyJoe

[NewJerseyJoe]

Woo-hoo, yay, hurrah. The Supreme Court now says yes to homosexual “marriage.” Today, you’re all doing limp-wristed high-fives and toasting each other with your tall half-caff soy lattes. But, as usual, you don’t see the big picture.

Keeping in line with your propensity for not thinking things through, you’ve neglected to consider something very important—something that will affect the lives of people you claim to love.

Let’s get two facts out of the way first.

1. There is no such thing as homosexual “marriage.” There never will be; there never can be. You can buy judges to rewrite the dictionary as often as you like, but it changes nothing.

2. The homosexual “marriage” push has never been about “marriage.” The percentage of homosexuals is tiny, and the number of those who will “marry” even smaller. It is and has always been a front, a weapon to attack and destroy Christian belief on a massive scale. Several centuries ago, King Henry VIII decided to pervert the definition of marriage; he and his murderous associates followed up by using it as an excuse to kill people and take their stuff. That’s the same plan now. The homosexuals are not the victors in this struggle; they’re the pawns.

Okay, you got that so far? I’m not asking if you agree—I know you don’t—I just want to ensure you’ve read it and understand my point of view before I continue. So let’s get down to brass tacks.

I and millions like me will never comply with this agenda. Never. I’ll resist it to my last breath, as my Faith compels me to. So that leaves you with one question that you must answer:

What manner of penalty do you dictate for me?

Yes, you read that correctly. This new, “tolerant,” “diverse,” open society that you think has been established will never allow people like me to publicly maintain this point of view. No—they will demand that I be punished or sanctioned in some manner. And you’re going to be required to give your blessing to this retribution.

So what’s it to be? What punishment will you demand for your brother, your uncle, your long-time friend?

• Perhaps I should be heavily fined or taxed. What do you think about that? Take away all of my assets for daring to say something in opposition to the “tolerant” people?

• Or maybe licensure and ostracization is the answer. Maybe I should be forced to seek “permission” to speak out against the things I disagree with and be branded with an identifying mark on my forehead.

• How about depriving me of my ability to have a livelihood or own a home? Perhaps the punishment should be that I am not allowed to hold a job—leaving me to become a bum, living in the gutter or only on the charity of others, or maybe just dying of exposure as the seasons change.

• Disenfranchisement is an option. Take away my right to vote for the things I believe in. After all, you have decided that my right to representation is to be ignored and suppressed, right?

• Of course, simplicity is usually the best answer. Maybe I should just take a bullet to the back of the head. What do you think of that? Governments have been doing that for a long time. It’s easy, quick, and relatively inexpensive. This might be the choice you should make.

This is not hyperbole. It’s not a joke. This is happening. It’s very likely that Obama, his goons, and his leftist followers will even recruit you to be the one who sells me out.

Are you ready for that?

So I ask you again: what manner of penalty do you dictate for me?

Tell me now, so I know where we stand in regard to each other.

[Covenantor]

Oh, there will be some more schooling to come.

What happens in the workplace when two men or two women announce their wedding plans? Will one get a call to the HR office to review why one didn’t sign the card or contribute to a gift for the couple? There goes your personnel file.

Competency ratings for advancement and wage increases will no longer be the prime criteria in the work environment.

It’s a more pervasive evil than it seems on the surface.

[redleghunter]

““The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose,”(William Shakespeare in The Merchant of Venice)

[Texas resident]

Wasn’t the gays complaint that they were having our values forced on them? Now they are forcing their values on all of us but with the full force of the federal government.

It isn’t facism when they do it.

[fso301]

Heck; one could get the SAME results about STRAIGHT marriage!

True, that's why I wrote in prior posts that I didn't know if what my wife and I discovered was in any way valid data or not. Never-the-less, the gender disparity displayed on FaceBook regarding gay marriage is still interesting.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

bkmk

[TheGrimReaper]

Don't know how you did it, but you read my mind - almost verbatim - from 1,500 miles away.
Nice job.

[Guenevere]

Gadsden Flag is great.....
have you also heard of ...An Appeal to Heaven .....flag?

We ordered ours this week....
George Washingto approved and used this flag during the Revolutionary War...
It is an appeal when all else seems to have failed...and his warriors carried it to battle, also his Navy.
An appeal to God for deliverance.