Posted on 03/26/2015 6:24:09 PM PDT by grundle
Edited on 03/26/2015 8:51:46 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Hillary Clinton is a polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident, secretive, out of touch candidate who represents the past, and will do anything to win.
And if you are wondering why I would say such a thing, here is the reason.
The words evil, lying, maniacal, shrew, and bitch are not on the list so we can still talk about her.
Can’t help but think this is a parody account, although knowing the left, it very well could be real.
One of their tweets: “We are HRC Super Volunteers, We are Legion, We do not allow sexism, We do not forgive words like “polarizing” or “calculating” Expect us.”
Yeah, I’m thinking it’s gotta be a joke.
So what does your blog have to do with posting a comment on a Daily Caller story.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/25/here-are-the-words-hillarys-supporters-wont-let-you-say/
Why don’t you just post the Caller story and comment on it?
You forgot greedy.
Worse than that, she has not driven herself in a car in 14 years!
Given her apparently compromised vestibular system, the car avoidance may be a really smart thing!
She is the youthful face of the Democrat Party.
And she is sicker than hell. Her heart is no good. She passes out and knocks her brains out. She is really too fat and old too.
That illness factor could actually work to her advantage.
I see a black VP candidate with the community organizers “wink-winking” to the ‘hoodsters about Hillary’s failing health.
*cough* Blogpimper *cough*
Seems like a little bit of plagiarism here, from my prior post.
He's just another Paul-Bot Libertarian with OCD and a vulgar screen name.
And a blog.
Nobody will ever trust a brainless president again after obama.
Sounds perfect....
What about cankular?
Plagiarism is what Blog Pimps do best.
They also like to take other folks' articles, change a word or two in the title and then think you owe them a hit for it.
Or, when desperate they take an article (like this one from Daily Caller) and attach a two sentence comment (that may or may not be their own) which could easily fit into the "Comment #1" spot and think you should click offsite to thank them for it.
Well a lot of people (myself included) figured nobody could get re-elected with $4 gas, 8% unemployment (13% real), trillion dollar deficits, surging food prices, and Benghazi.
Then you saw who he was running against.
Because 5 million conservative rejected the socialist morman father of communist health. They do that crap again with bushies and we give them 10 million!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.