Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Got that?
1 posted on 07/06/2014 5:32:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Their rhetoric would have you believe that Hobby Lobby has assigned a chaperone to every employee and any attempt to “access” an abortifacient is quickly denied by the chaperone.

They rage at a strawman.


2 posted on 07/06/2014 5:35:19 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hobby Lobby has freedom rights also!


3 posted on 07/06/2014 5:37:18 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Evidently the definition of freedom is "free stuff."
6 posted on 07/06/2014 5:43:03 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The left is just showing how unhinged they really are.


7 posted on 07/06/2014 5:43:11 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Boy, talk about delusional.
Funny how they always care so much about republicans
and the “mistakes” they make...


8 posted on 07/06/2014 5:43:40 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Lincoln Mitchell has over a decade of experience working in political development and consulting. In addition to serving as Chief of Party for the National Democratic Institute (NDI) in Georgia from 2002-2004, Lincoln has worked on democracy and governance related issues in the former Soviet Union, where he has advised businesses and other organizations as well, Eastern Europe, the Caribbean, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Lincoln also was on the faculty of Columbia University’s School of International Affairs from 2006-2013 and worked for years as a political consultant in New York City advising and managing domestic political campaigns. “

Everything and more than I EVER wanted to know about this dolt


11 posted on 07/06/2014 5:46:16 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

12 posted on 07/06/2014 5:47:08 PM PDT by JPG ("So sue me". OK, we will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
By ruling that corporations, on the grounds of the alleged religious views of their owners, can deny women access to some forms of contraception,

That's not what the Supremes ruled. They ruled that Hobby Lobby couldn't be forced to pay for that contraception. The women still have access to it.

The author is a liar. And a poor liar.

/johnny

13 posted on 07/06/2014 5:49:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

IN the words of Leftist Regressives who hailed the SC’s ruling on Obamacare- It’s SETTLED Law, Get Over It.


14 posted on 07/06/2014 5:50:58 PM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Ob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is another area where the government should be challenged.
Requiring employers to provide health insurance for employees. Employers have traditionally provided health insurance (and different levels of health insurance) as an additional perk to attract the best employees.

Now the government has taken it upon themselves to mandate a very high level of insurance for every employee.
That takes away one of the employer's tools for building a successful business.
If they continue along the same path, they will mandate that private enterprise employees be governed by civil service regulations which determine how, when, and which "benefits" the employer must provide. Maybe they should provide pay scales for each classification of employee and when they are entitled to pay raises and inflation adjustments. Let's not forget about telling employers how many employees of which kind they need and how they must post job vacancies.

Isn't this the classic definition of socialism?

15 posted on 07/06/2014 5:51:02 PM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The left’s war on the unborn trumps all. KMA you despicable lefties.
16 posted on 07/06/2014 5:52:02 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The article was written by a fool.

The supreme court decision has nothing to do with women’s health.

The same health care for women is available today that was available last week.

The author is a hysterical fool.


17 posted on 07/06/2014 5:52:18 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This decision raises the question of whether the Supreme Court will next rule that employers can tell workers how to spend the money they earn at their jobs.

As opposed to the Government telling workers how to spend the money they earn at their jobs....

18 posted on 07/06/2014 5:52:58 PM PDT by freebilly (How about this-- we stop trying to elect the unelectable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The author seems brain damaged.


20 posted on 07/06/2014 5:54:23 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

they can’t stop women from buying them themselves. they are hardly banned from using them by their employer.

they just aren’t going to pay for them.

tyranny is being forced into a contract you don’t want to be in and don’t agree with.


21 posted on 07/06/2014 5:56:24 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"It is now legal for corporations to deny workers important medical services . . . "

If the author means that it is now legal for corporations not to PAY for SOME medical services, as was the case for 99% of our nation's history, he is correct. So "now legal" is very misleading. It was, until two years ago, legal, and always had been.
22 posted on 07/06/2014 5:57:18 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamacares-muslim-exemption/


23 posted on 07/06/2014 5:58:15 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1f3qTt1YDk

How Does the Pill Kill Women?


25 posted on 07/06/2014 6:01:32 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is a textbook example of how difficult it is to reason with liberals. First the gov. forces a business to provide some sort of healthcare for its workers. Then it tells the company it must provide every kind of “healthcare” including killing children. The company must obey the dictates of Big Government. If they do not help an employee kill their child, by liberal “logic” they are denying healthcare. Sure sounds logical and constitutional to me. (snicker)


26 posted on 07/06/2014 6:04:32 PM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The leftists are freaking out because the supremes based their decision on the duly passed and enacted Religious Freedom Restoration Act from 1993 - settled law baby!

Hopefully this ruling will prevent any more cake makers being forced to make Adam and Steve wedding cakes.


28 posted on 07/06/2014 6:04:38 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson