Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
By ruling that corporations, on the grounds of the alleged religious views of their owners, can deny women access to some forms of contraception,

That's not what the Supremes ruled. They ruled that Hobby Lobby couldn't be forced to pay for that contraception. The women still have access to it.

The author is a liar. And a poor liar.

/johnny

13 posted on 07/06/2014 5:49:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper
The author is a liar. And a poor liar.

True, plus statements like:

This decision raises the question of whether the Supreme Court will next rule that employers can tell workers how to spend the money they earn at their jobs.

kinda proves that she doesn't know how to form a cogent argument. Man, talk about non-sequiturs...

19 posted on 07/06/2014 5:54:12 PM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

The interesting thing here, is that they consider the deletion of these pills from the guaranteed coverage package as tantamount to denying being able to get them.

What this bespeaks is a GRAND slavery to Uncle Sugar. It’s like if Uncle Sugar isn’t furnishing something you don’t have the option to get it some other way.

People who beg for slavery do not have a right to complain when their masters start getting perverse on them.


55 posted on 07/06/2014 6:51:26 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson