| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 05/14/2014 11:18:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
hijack whinefest. |
Posted on 05/12/2014 3:30:28 PM PDT by Sam Troy
DC Reporter Randy Foreman today obtained a copy of Doug Vogt's sealed filing now at the US Supreme Court which includes the list of people Doug Vogt believes forged Obama's long-form birth certificate. The list includes, Johanna Ah'Nee, Kevin Davidson(Dr. Conspiracy), Loretta Fuddy, and Alvin Onaka... Miki Booth implicated...
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
bookmark
Which of the content did you and your friends look at?
I’ve looked at all your content.
The divers must have notified every passenger that Fuddy was being taken in to protective custody since otherwise the divers would have been mentioned by the passengers. It so unusually that it likely would be one of the first things out of their mouths.
This is a very risky way to take someone into protective custody, and prone to failure.
Where is the official record you keep citing?
bfl
Hell if I know, I don't pay that much attention to this particular drama.
They’re biding time wearing their mask until they perceive a chance to get a dagger in where it can cause some real harm.
You seem familiar with the topic, point them out.
Who do you think those people are, HG? What’s your best guess?
Folks who like to stir you up maybe? Because you react so bombastically?
What official document are you citing that states at least two people swam to shore as well? Where are you getting that information?
Fake a crash landing to take someone into protective custody with all these moving parts seems ridiculous when you say it out loud, doesn’t it? I’ve told this to Butter here many times...there are much easier ways to either “off” someone or make them disappear than this nonsense.
How are they going to explain her just disappearing? Seriously. Are they going to claim she just got “lost in the mail”, like they’re claiming with the Maui Police Dept records that were supposedly sent to me? Pretty hard to just “lose” somebody.
If a person knows they’re gonna die anyway unless they do something drastic, the risks of not acting may be more than the risks associated with a plane crash when there are lots of divers and aircraft around to make sure everybody is safe, like they have when they do underwater film shoots.
Keep in mind that dozens of Benghazi witnesses were given new identities to hide them from Congressional investigators. To get new identities you have to come up with a reason for the old identity to disappear, some way that nobody will question. Some have suggested that Chris Stevens was allowed to die in order to keep him quiet. Would you put it past this regime? Remember Fast and Furious, where hundreds of Mexicans were considered “collateral damage” in this regime’s attempt to get rid of the 2nd Amendment in the US.
Look at the big picture of this regime, realize that Arpaio’s got evidence that the regime is probably aware of - and I will say that what I know of it is BIG, with huge stakes that the players involved are VERY aware of (we are, after all, talking about control of a large chunk of the free world - in a world where Obama’s lifelong friends the communists and Islamists both have a price on America’s head) - and tell me how much danger you think Fuddy may have been in from this regime, if they weren’t able to pass her off as dead.
If you were Fuddy and knew you could either be Breitbarted in Oahu one day, or try this escape to witness protection (perhaps in a mansion in Florida...) under a name that allowed your real friends to know it was you.... would you have a slightly different view of the danger issue?
You’re sounding crazier by the minute.
Where is the official record you keep citing?
In my hot little hand, awaiting the fulfillment of my other requests so I can be sure the records aren’t altered to try to explain the discrepancies.
It’s a little bit like putting witnesses in separate rooms and taking depositions before they have a chance to talk to each other.
Of course, the shenanigans done to delay the responses have bought time for fudging the records. And the MCFD incident report, which is posted on my blog, does show cutting and pasting to obscure the fact that the CAD transcript ends with one in critical condition in a CG helo. That report also refers to another report, which I also specifically asked to see when I saw that reference. I was told the report the chief cited by document number doesn’t actually exist...
Yeah, right...
Tell me how you would disappear Fuddy without suspicion. Details, please.
Keeping her alive is way too risky, too Hollywood to think she’s in a mansion in Florida and all her family and friends are in on the secret. She has something of vital importance that would embarrass a high ranking member of the government or head of state? She could just be dispatched, quietly and discreetly, without anyone being the wiser.
People do go missing. But more to the point, if protective custody was the goal then risking the death of the subject makes little sense.
If Fuddy wished to voluntarily enter p.c. then she could have done so with much less risk of death.
If she was involuntarily taken into p.c. it could have been done with much less risk of death.
If she was involuntarily taken into p.c. it could have been done with much less risk of exposure of the operation.
I note two things about your responses thus far:
1. You appear to not be willing to say what evidence you’ve looked at, or what your answers to the questions are.
2. Your responses are, instead, personal attacks against me, claiming that I’m making myself look crazy.
IOW, evading content, and desperately trying to paint me as crazy - as if that could explain away the evidence. It doesn’t. Try that with any judge and he/she will see right through you, as will most jurors.
If somebody disagrees with me but has good reasons and/or is willing to put their reasons under scrutiny and deal truthfully in pursuit of understanding, I will respect them even if I disagree with them. It’s when people skip right to the ad hominems instead of engaging with content that I question their motives. God knows the motives; I’ll just note that you’re resorting to ad hominems rather than engaging with the evidence.
So.. when folks don't respond to your "theories" properly.. they are suspect.
Damn, I wish I hadn't dropped Psych class, I'm sure that indicates some kind of malady..
Please stop lying. I've said several times I have looked at everything regarding this on your blog. I looked At all the pictures you have posted here. I've watched the youtube video, the video abc news has, and have done my own research and it all points to nothing.
2. Your responses are, instead, personal attacks against me, claiming that I’m making myself look crazy.
What you have posted thus far makes you seem a little off.
If somebody disagrees with me but has good reasons and/or is willing to put their reasons under scrutiny and deal truthfully in pursuit of understanding, I will respect them even if I disagree with them.
I "disagree" with you because I have not seen what you have seen, in all the photos you have posted. When you post a picture that has the caption, "what do you see" I try to see something, but cannot make anything out. When you state, "who or what is this" I look and see nothing, and wouldn't know who it is because it has no context. This goes for every single picture on your "blog".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.