| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 05/14/2014 11:18:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
hijack whinefest. |
Posted on 05/12/2014 3:30:28 PM PDT by Sam Troy
DC Reporter Randy Foreman today obtained a copy of Doug Vogt's sealed filing now at the US Supreme Court which includes the list of people Doug Vogt believes forged Obama's long-form birth certificate. The list includes, Johanna Ah'Nee, Kevin Davidson(Dr. Conspiracy), Loretta Fuddy, and Alvin Onaka... Miki Booth implicated...
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
I don’t know what to say to that; I wish I’d have seen it before it was deleted for whatever reason.
I said: “If there was no apology, I find it hard to believe that the offensive comment wasn’t retracted.”
The operative word is IF.
This is what I got:
“I’m saying what I feel.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2642492/posts?page=92#92
I won’t go through over 1,000 posts. If you got it, please post it.
Do I pass? :-)
LOL!
Here’s a link to the ‘04 convention ~ Day 2...lot’s of posts, not sure if this is the thread you’re talking about...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1179616/posts?page=1673#1673
She tried to explain but that wasn’t good enough. They won’t rest until they get rid of her.
Several years ago, many of us, including former military and active duty members, were disappointed by what appeared to be the highest military command so easily acquiescing or succumbing to being led by what also appeared to be a constitutionally unqualified presidential candidate.
We knew military officers were bound by oath solely to defend the constitution, while other lower ranking military personnel were required to further swear they would obey the orders of the president. The truth of the matter is we do not know what back-channel efforts were made by the command to sort out the issue, and whether the command determined its position was within the bounds of its oath.
That event is somewhat similar to what we are facing today, with the House of Representatives declining to arrest Lois Lerner. The IRS is required by statute to provide reports in response to House requests. Presently, it appears the executive branch of our government is illegally obstructing the legislative branch of our government from performing the constitutional duty it owes to each of us.
The USSC has supported such arrest power, at least in the case of ordinary citizens and it would be unthinkable that the court would approve behavior that even more directly cripples the ordinary workings of the government. So why is the House not taking action that will enable it to perform its duties?
(With apologies to the OP.)
Who are they Fred Nerks,The Owner of this forum asked her to post with a peer review before she started threads.She told him to get lost.
Threats, bribes and cowardice?
She explained in detail but the comment above was pulled before most people saw it.
‘They’ are the same people who still hold a grudge after four years.
As for the rest of your comment, I have no idea what you are referring to. I’m commenting on what I saw happen today.
I have no idea what you are taking about 4 years ago.Got ya.
Agree 100% - This story will NEVER get legs. Lame-steam media will not allow the story the exposure it deserves.
Thanks Jane. This was on the women’s threads that preceded the “daily dose “. Dad called it “the backyard fence” and joked that American had a big back yard. We’d share recipes Joke Talk politics— complain about Hillary and wear our pearls while sharing. The pearls and owning a devil egg dish were required for “membership”. Lots of fun but also many serious discussions.
When the freeper mention O might be the only person the Rats had to run against Hillary the freeper mentioned he was not eligible because of his father not being a citizen and he was not born in the US but Kenya
Several briefly discussed what the qualifications were. We spoke thru FR mail later that night
Sounds like some good threads at the “Backyard Fence”. Sorry I missed them. I even meet the membership requirement ;)
That was the joke. We all had them. Sometimes several!
Daily dose in search should give you a taste. First ones on won a virtual toaster. Met. Many lovely people thru that thread
Vendome, I love our military and stated that in posts 70, 92, 106, 156, 134, 183, 198, 212m 236, and 244 on the thread at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2642492/posts?q=1&;page=201 and gave an official apology in post 236. I profusely explained what I had meant, and all but the trolls were able to recognize that I was so angered because I love the HONOR of honorable men taking oaths to uphold the Constitution.
A dozen posts explaining what I meant and an official apology isn’t enough for some people. Four years later they’ll STILL claim I never apologized, in order to sidetrack from the issue at hand - which in this case was that Free Republic has a pack of “concerned” posters who gang up to stink up threads where somebody besides the MSM gate-keepers-of-all-truth presents evidence.
It happens in a lot of threads. For instance, I’ve been told that my evidence regarding Loretta Fuddy’s death is not welcome here because it’s just too “crazy” to think that people in this regime would conspire to hide the truth. Doesn’t matter what’s on video, doesn’t matter what contradictions show up in the stories and the official reports. None of the evidence DARE be spoken here because it’s just too “crazy” to think that the regime lies, murders, and conspires.
Conservatives would NEVER think such crazy things about our beloved current regime. They would NEVER listen to evidence from somebody besides the MSM. It would be way too EMBARRASSING to conservatives to have anybody claiming to be conservative who would be so “batsh!t crazy”. Or so says the stink raised by a certain group of close-knit posters - wanting to be the gatekeepers of what conservatives can think and what evidence they can be allowed to see.
My comment here was to the poster of this thread, letting him know that the technique used here to silence people is to first stink up a thread with a bunch of “concern” over how “embarrassing” original thought is here, and then if people won’t be silenced or deterred by the stink in the thread, then the tattlers come in and get the big guns to gag or ban whoever they want to silence. So even though there are people who appreciate the posts and agree with it, very few will come out and say that for fear of being gagged.
I wanted the poster to understand that this is the case, so he won’t do what this group wants: think he is alone, and crazy, and that nobody understands what he’s posting. It’s a psy-op, to drive off to the side one little sheep, isolate it, and devour it while the rest of the flock watches, silent - afraid of the same thing happening to them.
If evidence is not welcome here, and if people have to be afraid of being gagged/banned if they speak their real thoughts, this place is not the Free Republic I have known and loved.
In the past 5 months I have seen ugliness that most people would not believe. Most of it from people who claim to be “friends”. He/she can act a part most of the time - as the fogbow folks constantly brag about doing here on FR, for instance - but when he perceives that the sheep may be vulnerable, the wolf just can’t help but bare the fangs and attempt to pick off that sheep and devour it. Wolves run in packs, here as everywhere else, using the same techniques as the wolves in sheep’s clothing who are trying to destroy this country. And if we think it can’t happen here at FR - or in this country - then it is GUARANTEED to happen here. That’s what the Founding Fathers knew.
Sometimes, though, the wolves don’t cover their tracks as well as they thought... They leave evidence. That’s when the people with evidence have to be silenced, if the “game” of Fool-the-Idiots is to continue...
That would be the traditional approach; however, in Boner’s case, bribes would not seem necessary.
I did leave out “really on the same side” group.
It happens on the Ukraine topics too, but it’s more recent, so not as developed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.