Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas court rules that police may introduce illegally gathered evidence at trial
Coach is Right ^ | 3/15/14 | Doug Book

Posted on 03/15/2014 9:01:05 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax

Texas prosecutors are applauding a decision by the State Court of Criminal Appeals which provides police officers a second chance to present evidence which has been gathered contrary to Texas law and the 4th Amendment. The ruling literally offers law enforcement a “do-over;” an opportunity to secure a search warrant AFTER a home has been illegally searched and AFTER evidence has been improperly obtained.

In 2010, police in Parker County, Texas received a call from a confidential informant (CI) who claimed that Fred Wehrenberg and a number of associates “were fixin’” to cook meth. Hours after the call–at 12:30 A.M the following day–police entered the Wehrenberg home without a warrant and against the wishes of Wehrenberg. Police handcuffed all of the occupants, held them in the front yard and proceeded to perform what the officers described as a “protective sweep” of the residence. An hour and a half later, after finding no meth being made on the premises, police prepared a...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; evidence; legal; wehrenberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

1 posted on 03/15/2014 9:01:06 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

NO!!!!


2 posted on 03/15/2014 9:03:20 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

I don’t see this ruling surviving federal court scrutiny, under the “fruits of the poisonous tree” doctrine.


3 posted on 03/15/2014 9:04:27 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

So, do y’all think America as you have known it still exists? If you do, you need to pull your head out of your posterior.


4 posted on 03/15/2014 9:04:37 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“I don’t see this ruling surviving federal court scrutiny,”

You want the feds to be involved?

Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals.


5 posted on 03/15/2014 9:05:44 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

             

Førward, baby !

6 posted on 03/15/2014 9:07:48 AM PDT by tomkat (3%+1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Yeah screw that pesky 400 year old constitution. /s


7 posted on 03/15/2014 9:07:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: sagar
"Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals."

Kind of like the NKVD fought criminals in the old Soviet Union...

9 posted on 03/15/2014 9:10:22 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals

Please refer to #6, above.


(they'll get to your house sooner/later)

10 posted on 03/15/2014 9:10:22 AM PDT by tomkat (3%+1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals.

Are you freakin' kidding me? If you believe that this is a good idea you belong over on DU not on a freedom-protecting/conservative site. You're for a totalitarian/tyrannical government system.

11 posted on 03/15/2014 9:11:02 AM PDT by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals.

Um, no; this just shows that Texas has no sense of jurisprudence — if they cannot have those who are tasked with enforcing the law to keep the law then they have surrendered the integrity of the whole judicial system.

12 posted on 03/15/2014 9:11:29 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals.

Until Texas or the Feds decide that YOU are the criminal. Remember Waco.

13 posted on 03/15/2014 9:13:57 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sagar
"Again, Texas shows the way to fight criminals."

If you believe in the US Constitution as the law of the land, the criminals won this court case.

14 posted on 03/15/2014 9:15:39 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

“Kind of like the NKVD fought criminals in the old Soviet Union... “

You got that right.


15 posted on 03/15/2014 9:16:21 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sagar

No. Just no.


16 posted on 03/15/2014 9:16:27 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Pendulum swung so far to the side of the criminals for so long in terms of interpretation of what’s a reasonable search this was bound to happen.

Liberal/leftists had taken over the entire court system.


17 posted on 03/15/2014 9:16:28 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Mapp vs Ohio.


18 posted on 03/15/2014 9:17:24 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (GOP = The Whig Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I don’t see this ruling surviving federal court scrutiny, under the “fruits of the poisonous tree” doctrine.


Never thought I’d live to see the day when freezers would be calling for help and cheering on the leftist Democrat appointed Federal judges.


19 posted on 03/15/2014 9:17:42 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Freezers should be Freepers, of course.


20 posted on 03/15/2014 9:18:21 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson