So go on, tell me again how much zero resembles him:
Posted on 02/23/2014 3:09:07 PM PST by butterdezillion
The photos of the Loretta Fuddy Cessna crash that Josh Lang provided to the media? They weren't of the same plane. The plane that crashed with Fuddy in it had a window between the door and the tail; Lang's photos don't. (I've got photos at my blog and in the first post I'll post them so you can compare the 2 planes)
Lang apparently had photos of a DIFFERENT plane ditching in the water and gave them to the media, claiming they were of this crash, and apparently the media didn't check out the genuineness of the photos...
Now why would Lang do that? Why would he post images of the area with no passengers or anything else in the water ANYWHERE, rather than taking photos of what was actually there and giving those to the media?
Once upon a time, before talking heads ruled what we see and hear, real reporters wrote in depth articles and people read them, and were able to discern fact from fiction.
____________________
But that was back when reporters gave facts and people made up their own minds what to think about those facts. Now, in the age of “civic journalism”, the spinsters pick and choose what facts to give, how to present them, and lead the readers to the conclusion that the writers believe to be the “correct” conclusion. Used to be, we were allowed to think. Now we’re not to be trusted to think, so we’re spoon fed opinions, cherry-picked facts, and outright lies.
And all that nonsense wouldn’t exist if his records weren’t all sealed and you knew without a doubt, who he was and where he was born and who his parents were. The entire situation is making the US a laughing stock throughout the world. You’ve got a man to whom the band stikes up Hail to the Chief and you don’t know who he is.
Then you blame the voters. How would you know what they would have chosen, if they knew his background?
And don’t tell me the fairy-tale about a black student from Kenya and a lily white teenager from Kansas. The Wizard of Oz was more believable than that rubbish.
Ditto! Well said. I did not know that about the Australian Prime Minister with a false biography. Wow. You’ve seen this before. No wonder it interests you so (besides the obvious—concern for the entire world).
I’m not sure that we know that he’s either articulate OR clean. Didn’t his daughter say he stinks? Without that teleprompter, he babbles. He’s a cipher. Zero. Well nicknamed.
Your question is incomprehensible as it is contrary to the evidence in front of you. No point in continuing this as you are blockheaded.
The ‘progressives’ call the tune and rule the medium. Everything ‘old’ and tried and true has to be destroyed. Why? Because they are useless. They produce nothing. But unfortunately they outnumber you. It’s ATLAS SHRUGGED come to life.
GOOD LORD! I WAS USING THAT SCENARIO AS AN EXAMPLE, THERE'S NO STRAIGHTER NOR TRUE A MAN THAN TONY ABBOT!
I WROTE: 'IT'S AS IF'!
Or it's like the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom was an abominable snowman...
IT'S AN ANALOGY.
Oh. HA! HA! My bad. I misread your sentence. (Had a tiring day and insomnia last night.) SO SORRY. I thought you were talking about some past prime minister. Thought I remembered something about Menzies being defended by his daughter against accusations of Nazi sympathies. Not Mr. Abbot. I have to admit I know very little about him. One thing our news is NOT and that’s comprehensive. We hear little about Australia or the rest of the world. We do hear about natural disasters. That makes the news, especially if it “supports” global warming. We hear little else, unless somebody down under DARES to disagree with Barry.
Good night, Irene. I’m getting some sleep. I’ll be able to read and comprehend better in the morning. :)
lol! and it’s goodnight from me, you nearly gave me kittens.
Oooh, aren’t you clever!
Of course I blame the voters. They couldn't be bothered to check him out, yet the still found their way to the polls.
And don’t tell me the fairy-tale about a black student from Kenya and a lily white teenager from Kansas. The Wizard of Oz was more believable than that rubbish.
It's a simple story: Anarchist Annie was a pushover for the charismatic Kenyan commie. No need to make it more complicated than that.
FMD was definitely involved in Barry's upbringing, but no way was he Barry's father. Those supposed porno shots of SAD at his home have been shown to be of another actress a couple of years earlier. And as for Malcolm X, he was never in a position to be the father. And, as for that Indonesian dude: Little Barry didn't encounter Indonesia until his mother hooked up with Lolo Soetoro, several years after his birth.
Nicely said. I can respect generally respect a person who is unconvinced by various arguments that Obama has committed some degree of fraud. I can respect a person who doesn’t agree with my best attempt at interpreting the framers’ intended meaning of ‘natural born citizen’. I can in some cases tolerate the views of a person who finds the pursuit of “birtherism” futile and/or not politically expedient.
BUT how can I suffer a person who is unable to work out how it would be good for our country to uncover a felonious identity ruse perpetrated by one of the most corrupt Presidents in U.S. history? It certainly is possible that such a person sincerely holds some conservative views, but with respect to this issue she has demonstrated a willingness to abandon intellectually honest debate in preference for deceptive rhetorical tricks. Doesn’t such a person forfeit all expectation to be heeded or to be regarded as capable of adding anything worthwhile to the eligibility discussions?
Is it not true that cyn begs us to see her as nothing more than a deeply devoted shill for Obama when it comes to his claims and documentation about his identity and background. It seems that her interest is not even so noble as to be rooted in an earnest desire to prove Obama right. Instead, based on her recent comment on this thread, her apparent goal is simply to trick as many people as possible into halting their inquiries. Her voice boils down simply to this:
“Please, I beg you to stop thinking about whether Obama is telling the truth about his birth circumstances. Even if he could be proven, in broad daylight, to have manipulated two federal elections by committing identity fraud with the aid of forged birth certificates and other documents, it wouldn’t really help the United States to know. Just leave him alone already!”
Are you saying that the top window frames of the window(s?) between the wing and the door are not visible on Lang’s photo?
Are you saying that the top frames of the 2 windows between the wing and the door ARE visible (not submerged) on Puentes’ image of Fuddy and Yamamoto by the door?
Where is the factual disagreement between us? Which of my observations are you saying are wrong?
Very well said. Everyone's taking their masks off.
And as for Malcolm X, he was never in a position to be the father.
For some reason, you take Ayers’ “Dreams” to be true, that Stanley Ann was his mother.
The most I could give FMD credit for is that he was, as the head of an organisation in Honolulu named THE COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FOREIGN BORN more than likely the man responsible for the fake registration of the birth of the unidentified child (that was photographed with Stanley Ann Dunham in 1963,) on the very same day that Virginia Sunahara's death announcement appeared in the paper...
Those supposed porno shots of SAD at his home have been shown to be of another actress a couple of years earlier.
And no one did more to dispel that disgusting and ridiculous story than I did.
And as for Malcolm X, he was never in a position to be the father.
Now there's an interesting comment. You don't know who his parents were because he's presented you with an empty slate and a forged bc, but you do know who his father wasn't? Do you know that one biographer who spent something like ten years on the project, indicated that both he and Betty had affairs? That he spent more time overseas in the last few years from 1959 onwards than in the US?
And, as for that Indonesian dude: Little Barry didn't encounter Indonesia until his mother hooked up with Lolo Soetoro, several years after his birth.
If you are referring to the 'Indonesian dude' who is portrayed on the right hand side of the composite I posted, that's not Lolo, that's Papak Subuh, the latest contender for fatherhood, and certainly not of my choosing. As for Lolo, you are correct. Ultimately, there will be many like yourself who might say at this point what difference does it make but as long as there's one voice out there maintaining it does make a difference, the issue remains.
Question. Is Papak Subuh also Muhammed Subuh? What would you know about him under the name Papak.
So go on, tell me again how much zero resembles him:
This is not a photo of a younger man that I have. I don’t know how to send my photo of Muhammed Subuh but you can check it out by logging onto a posting by ConservativeMan55 on Wed Jan 22,2014 to butterdezillion. I tend to think you will see a resemblance of younger man to Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.